Ariadne Labs, a Joint Center between Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Jun 27;5(2):232-243. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00411.
Shifting childbirth into facilities has not improved health outcomes for mothers and newborns as significantly as hoped. Improving the quality and safety of care provided during facility-based childbirth requires helping providers to adhere to essential birth practices-evidence-based behaviors that reduce harm to and save lives of mothers and newborns. To achieve this goal, we developed the BetterBirth Program, which we tested in a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India. The goal of this intervention was to improve adoption and sustained use of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC), an organized collection of 28 essential birth practices that are known to improve the quality of facility-based childbirth care. Here, we describe the BetterBirth Program in detail, including its 4 main features: implementation tools, an implementation strategy of coaching, an implementation pathway (Engage-Launch-Support), and a sustainability plan. This coaching-based implementation of the SCC motivates and empowers care providers to identify, understand, and resolve the barriers they face in using the SCC with the resources already available. We describe important lessons learned from our experience with the BetterBirth Program as it was tested in the BetterBirth Trial. For example, the emphasis on relationship building and respect led to trust between coaches and birth attendants and helped influence change. In addition, the cloud-based data collection and feedback system proved a valuable asset in the coaching process. More research on coaching-based interventions is required to refine our understanding of what works best to improve quality and safety of care in various settings.Note: At the time of publication of this article, the results of evaluation of the impact of the BetterBirth Program were pending publication in another journal. After the impact findings have been published, we will update this article with a reference to the impact findings.
将分娩转移到医疗机构并没有像预期的那样显著改善母婴的健康结果。提高医疗机构分娩护理的质量和安全性需要帮助提供者遵守基本的分娩实践——基于证据的行为,这些行为可以减少母亲和新生儿的伤害并拯救生命。为了实现这一目标,我们开发了 BetterBirth 计划,并在印度北方邦进行了一项配对、整群随机对照试验来测试该计划。该干预措施的目标是提高世界卫生组织安全分娩清单(SCC)的采用率和持续使用率,该清单是一套 28 项基本分娩实践的有序集合,已知这些实践可以提高医疗机构分娩护理的质量。在这里,我们详细描述了 BetterBirth 计划,包括其 4 个主要特点:实施工具、辅导实施策略、实施途径(参与-启动-支持)和可持续性计划。这种基于辅导的 SCC 实施激励并赋予护理提供者权力,使他们能够识别、理解和解决在使用 SCC 时面临的障碍,同时利用现有的资源。我们描述了从 BetterBirth 计划在 BetterBirth 试验中的测试经验中学到的重要经验教训。例如,强调建立关系和尊重导致了教练和分娩助手之间的信任,并有助于影响变革。此外,基于云的数据收集和反馈系统在辅导过程中是一个有价值的资产。需要更多关于基于辅导的干预措施的研究,以深化我们对在各种环境中提高护理质量和安全性的最佳方法的理解。注意:在本文发表时,BetterBirth 计划影响的评估结果尚未在另一本期刊上发表。在发布影响研究结果后,我们将用参考影响研究结果的方式更新本文。