IGOID Research Group (Research in Management of Organizations and Facilities Sports), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
School of Sport Science, European University, Madrid, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Mar;33(3):831-838. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002090.
López-Fernández, J, Gallardo, L, Fernández-Luna, Á, Villacañas, V, García-Unanue, J, and Sánchez-Sánchez, J. Pitch size and game surface in different small-sided games. Global indicators, activity profile, and acceleration of female soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 33(3): 831-838, 2019-The aim of this research was to evaluate the influence of game surface and pitch size on the movement profile in female soccer players during small-sided games (SSGs) of 4 v 4. Sixteen women played 3 different 4-a-side (400, 600, and 800 m) on 3 surfaces (ground [GR], artificial turf [AT], and natural grass [NG]). Time-motion variables were assessed through GPS devices (Spi Pro X, GPSports, Australia). Ground had the worst outputs on most variables. NG achieved higher results than AT in terms of total distance (SSG 400 [+37.000 m; p = 0.006]; SSG 600 [+59.989 m; p < 0.001]; and SSG 800 [+42.284 m; p = 0.001]). However, the smaller SSG (400) had the lowest values on most variables. However, although the middle SSG (600) presented higher output than the bigger one (800) for body load (NG [+7.745 a.u.; p < 0.001]; AT [+8.207 a.u.; p < 0.001]; and GR [+5.879 a.u.; p < 0.001]), it had lower results for high-intensity distance (NG [-13.15 m; p = 0.025] and AT [-13.59 m; p = 0.026]). Despite women's performance being higher on AT than GR, the NG surface still showed the highest outcomes in the most intense SSG. Moreover, although the performance increases in bigger pitches, if the size is too large the outputs could be reduced.
洛佩斯-费尔南德斯、加尔加多、费尔南德斯-卢娜、比利亚卡尼亚斯、加西亚-乌纳纽和桑切斯-桑切斯。不同小场比赛中的球的大小和场地表面对女性足球运动员的全局指标、活动特征和加速的影响。J 力量与调理研究 33(3)：831-838，2019-本研究的目的是评估在女子足球运动员进行 4 对 4 的小场比赛（SSG）中，场地表面和场地大小对运动特征的影响。16 名女性在 3 种表面（草地[GR]、人造草皮[AT]和天然草皮[NG]）上进行了 3 种 4 对 4 的比赛（400、600 和 800 米）。通过 GPS 设备（Spi Pro X，GPSports，澳大利亚）评估时间运动变量。地面在大多数变量上的输出最差。NG 在总距离方面的成绩优于 AT（SSG 400[+37.000 米；p=0.006]；SSG 600[+59.989 米；p<0.001]；和 SSG 800[+42.284 米；p=0.001]）。然而，较小的 SSG（400）在大多数变量上的数值最低。然而，尽管中间的 SSG（600）的身体负荷比较大的 SSG（800）高（NG[+7.745 a.u.；p<0.001]；AT[+8.207 a.u.；p<0.001]；和 GR[+5.879 a.u.；p<0.001]），但高强度距离的成绩较低（NG[-13.15 米；p=0.025]和 AT[-13.59 米；p=0.026]）。尽管女性在 AT 上的表现优于 GR，但 NG 表面在最激烈的 SSG 中仍表现出最高的结果。此外，尽管较大的场地会提高运动员的表现，但如果场地过大，成绩可能会下降。
