Alaune Dovydas, Snieckus Audrius, Travassos Bruno, Chmura Paweł, Pizarro David, Coutinho Diogo
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, 44221 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 28;25(13):4035. doi: 10.3390/s25134035.
This study investigated the impact of varying the number of small goals on elite female soccer players' decision-making, technical-tactical skills, running performance, and perceived exertion during game-based situations (GBSs). Sixteen national female players (aged 22.33 ± 2.89 years) participated in three conditions within an 8vs8 game without a goalkeeper (45 × 40 m), each featuring a different number of small goals (1.2 × 0.8 m): (i) 1 small goal (1G); (ii) 2 small goals (2G); and (iii) 3 small goals (3G). Sensors to track players' positioning, perceived exertion, and notational analysis were used to evaluate player performance. The results indicated that players covered a greater distance at low intensity during the 2G condition compared to both 1G ( = 0.024) and 3G ( ≤ 0.05). Conversely, the 3G condition promoted a higher distance covered at high intensity compared to 2G ( ≤ 0.05). The 1G condition resulted in fewer accelerations (2G, = 0.003; 3G, < 0.001) and decelerations (2G, = 0.012) compared to conditions with additional goals. However, there were no statistically significant effects on technical-tactical actions. Notably, a trend toward improved decision-making was observed in the 1G condition compared to 2G (ES = -0.64 [-1.39; 0.11]) and a longer ball possession duration compared to 3G (ES = -0.28 [-0.71; 0.16]). In conclusion, coaches working with elite female soccer players can strategically vary the number of goals to achieve specific physical aims (i.e., using 2G to emphasize acceleration and deceleration or 3G to promote high-intensity distance) with minimal effects on their perceived fatigue, technical-tactical variables, and decision-making.
本研究调查了在基于比赛的情境(GBS)中,改变小目标数量对精英女子足球运动员决策、技术战术技能、跑步表现和主观用力感觉的影响。16名国家女子球员(年龄22.33±2.89岁)在无守门员的8对8比赛(45×40米)中参与了三种条件,每种条件有不同数量的小目标(1.2×0.8米):(i)1个小目标(1G);(ii)2个小目标(2G);(iii)3个小目标(3G)。使用传感器追踪球员位置、主观用力感觉并进行记录分析来评估球员表现。结果表明,与1G(P = 0.024)和3G(P≤0.05)相比,球员在2G条件下低强度时覆盖的距离更远。相反,与2G相比,3G条件下高强度时覆盖的距离更长(P≤0.05)。与有额外目标的条件相比,1G条件下的加速次数更少(2G,P = 0.003;3G,P<0.001)和减速次数更少(2G,P = 0.012)。然而,对技术战术动作没有统计学上的显著影响。值得注意的是,与2G相比,在1G条件下观察到决策改善的趋势(效应大小ES = -0.64[-1.39;0.11]),与3G相比控球时间更长(效应大小ES = -0.28[-0.71;0.16])。总之,与精英女子足球运动员合作的教练可以策略性地改变目标数量,以实现特定的身体目标(即使用2G来强调加速和减速,或使用3G来促进高强度距离),同时对她们的主观疲劳、技术战术变量和决策的影响最小。