• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应性学习的元可塑性最佳结构。

Optimal structure of metaplasticity for adaptive learning.

作者信息

Khorsand Peyman, Soltani Alireza

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jun 28;13(6):e1005630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005630. eCollection 2017 Jun.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005630
PMID:28658247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5509349/
Abstract

Learning from reward feedback in a changing environment requires a high degree of adaptability, yet the precise estimation of reward information demands slow updates. In the framework of estimating reward probability, here we investigated how this tradeoff between adaptability and precision can be mitigated via metaplasticity, i.e. synaptic changes that do not always alter synaptic efficacy. Using the mean-field and Monte Carlo simulations we identified 'superior' metaplastic models that can substantially overcome the adaptability-precision tradeoff. These models can achieve both adaptability and precision by forming two separate sets of meta-states: reservoirs and buffers. Synapses in reservoir meta-states do not change their efficacy upon reward feedback, whereas those in buffer meta-states can change their efficacy. Rapid changes in efficacy are limited to synapses occupying buffers, creating a bottleneck that reduces noise without significantly decreasing adaptability. In contrast, more-populated reservoirs can generate a strong signal without manifesting any observable plasticity. By comparing the behavior of our model and a few competing models during a dynamic probability estimation task, we found that superior metaplastic models perform close to optimally for a wider range of model parameters. Finally, we found that metaplastic models are robust to changes in model parameters and that metaplastic transitions are crucial for adaptive learning since replacing them with graded plastic transitions (transitions that change synaptic efficacy) reduces the ability to overcome the adaptability-precision tradeoff. Overall, our results suggest that ubiquitous unreliability of synaptic changes evinces metaplasticity that can provide a robust mechanism for mitigating the tradeoff between adaptability and precision and thus adaptive learning.

摘要

在不断变化的环境中从奖励反馈中学习需要高度的适应性,然而奖励信息的精确估计需要缓慢更新。在估计奖励概率的框架中,我们研究了如何通过元可塑性(即并不总是改变突触效能的突触变化)来缓解适应性和精确性之间的这种权衡。使用平均场和蒙特卡罗模拟,我们确定了“优越”的元可塑性模型,这些模型可以显著克服适应性 - 精确性的权衡。这些模型可以通过形成两组独立的元状态:储存库和缓冲器来实现适应性和精确性。处于储存库元状态的突触在奖励反馈时不会改变其效能,而处于缓冲器元状态的突触可以改变其效能。效能的快速变化仅限于占据缓冲器的突触,从而形成一个瓶颈,减少噪声而不会显著降低适应性。相比之下,更多的储存库可以产生强烈的信号而不表现出任何可观察到的可塑性。通过比较我们的模型和一些竞争模型在动态概率估计任务中的行为,我们发现优越的元可塑性模型在更广泛的模型参数范围内表现接近最优。最后,我们发现元可塑性模型对模型参数的变化具有鲁棒性,并且元可塑性转变对于适应性学习至关重要,因为用分级可塑性转变(改变突触效能的转变)取代它们会降低克服适应性 - 精确性权衡的能力。总体而言,我们的结果表明,突触变化普遍存在的不可靠性表明元可塑性可以提供一种强大的机制来缓解适应性和精确性之间的权衡,从而实现适应性学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/92eb7eddf3b4/pcbi.1005630.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/2e51d3c8f92b/pcbi.1005630.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/d36a614a627b/pcbi.1005630.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/c7b335026059/pcbi.1005630.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/b2726703bdea/pcbi.1005630.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/21bbe50f247f/pcbi.1005630.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/0560f72b3739/pcbi.1005630.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/355faf9e0c8c/pcbi.1005630.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/fa2efafbb0e0/pcbi.1005630.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/54e30253f546/pcbi.1005630.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/92eb7eddf3b4/pcbi.1005630.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/2e51d3c8f92b/pcbi.1005630.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/d36a614a627b/pcbi.1005630.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/c7b335026059/pcbi.1005630.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/b2726703bdea/pcbi.1005630.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/21bbe50f247f/pcbi.1005630.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/0560f72b3739/pcbi.1005630.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/355faf9e0c8c/pcbi.1005630.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/fa2efafbb0e0/pcbi.1005630.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/54e30253f546/pcbi.1005630.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38f1/5509349/92eb7eddf3b4/pcbi.1005630.g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal structure of metaplasticity for adaptive learning.适应性学习的元可塑性最佳结构。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Jun 28;13(6):e1005630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005630. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Sparseness constrains the prolongation of memory lifetime via synaptic metaplasticity.稀疏性通过突触元可塑性限制记忆寿命的延长。
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Jan;18(1):67-77. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm037. Epub 2007 May 8.
3
Learning in neural networks by reinforcement of irregular spiking.通过强化不规则脉冲发放实现神经网络学习。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Apr;69(4 Pt 1):041909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.041909. Epub 2004 Apr 30.
4
Adaptive self-organization in a realistic neural network model.现实神经网络模型中的自适应自组织
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Dec;80(6 Pt 1):061917. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.061917. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
5
Robustness of learning that is based on covariance-driven synaptic plasticity.基于协方差驱动突触可塑性的学习的稳健性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Mar 7;4(3):e1000007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000007.
6
Adaptive Synaptogenesis Constructs Neural Codes That Benefit Discrimination.适应性突触形成构建有利于辨别力的神经编码。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Jul 15;11(7):e1004299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004299. eCollection 2015 Jul.
7
Noise-driven switching between limit cycles and adaptability in a small-dimensional excitable network with balanced coupling.具有平衡耦合的小维度可激发网络中噪声驱动的极限环切换与适应性
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Mar;73(3 Pt 1):031914. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.031914. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
8
Representation of input structure in synaptic weights by spike-timing-dependent plasticity.通过尖峰时间依赖可塑性在突触权重中表征输入结构。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Aug;82(2 Pt 1):021912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.82.021912. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
9
A model of cerebellar metaplasticity.小脑可塑性模型。
Learn Mem. 1998 Jan-Feb;4(5):421-8. doi: 10.1101/lm.4.5.421.
10
Shaping embodied neural networks for adaptive goal-directed behavior.塑造用于适应性目标导向行为的具身神经网络。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Mar 28;4(3):e1000042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000042.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational processes of simultaneous learning of stochasticity and volatility in humans.人类对随机性和波动性的同时学习的计算过程。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 21;15(1):9073. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53459-z.
2
Mechanisms of adjustments to different types of uncertainty in the reward environment across mice and monkeys.在老鼠和猴子中,对奖励环境中不同类型不确定性的调整机制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):600-619. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01059-z. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
3
Computational mechanisms of distributed value representations and mixed learning strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Metaplasticity as a Neural Substrate for Adaptive Learning and Choice under Uncertainty.作为不确定性下适应性学习与选择的神经基础的元可塑性
Neuron. 2017 Apr 19;94(2):401-414.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.044.
2
Computational principles of synaptic memory consolidation.突触记忆巩固的计算原理。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Dec;19(12):1697-1706. doi: 10.1038/nn.4401. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Models of Metaplasticity: A Review of Concepts.化生可塑性模型:概念综述
分布式价值表示和混合学习策略的计算机制。
Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 10;12(1):7191. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27413-2.
4
A model for learning based on the joint estimation of stochasticity and volatility.基于随机波动联合估计的学习模型。
Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 15;12(1):6587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26731-9.
5
Computational models of adaptive behavior and prefrontal cortex.自适应行为和前额叶皮层的计算模型。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(1):58-71. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01123-1. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
6
Interactions between ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex during learning and behavioural change.腹外侧前额叶皮层和前扣带皮层在学习和行为改变过程中的相互作用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jan;47(1):196-210. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01079-2. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
Timescales of Cognition in the Brain.大脑认知的时间尺度
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Oct;41:30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
How Outcome Uncertainty Mediates Attention, Learning, and Decision-Making.结果不确定性如何影响注意力、学习和决策。
Trends Neurosci. 2020 Oct;43(10):795-809. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
9
A simple model for learning in volatile environments.在不稳定环境中学习的一种简单模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jul 1;16(7):e1007963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007963. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Adaptive learning under expected and unexpected uncertainty.在预期和意外不确定性下的自适应学习。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Oct;20(10):635-644. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0180-y.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Nov 10;9:138. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00138. eCollection 2015.
4
Reversal learning and dopamine: a bayesian perspective.逆向学习与多巴胺:贝叶斯视角
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 11;35(6):2407-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1989-14.2015.
5
Metaplasticity in human cortex.人类大脑皮层的形质变化。
Neuroscientist. 2015 Apr;21(2):185-202. doi: 10.1177/1073858414526645. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
6
Emerging roles of metaplasticity in behaviour and disease.代谢型可塑性在行为和疾病中的新兴作用。
Trends Neurosci. 2013 Jun;36(6):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.风险、意外不确定性和估计不确定性:不稳定环境下的贝叶斯学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Jan 20;7(1):e1001048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001048.
8
Synaptic computation underlying probabilistic inference.概率推理的突触计算。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Jan;13(1):112-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.2450. Epub 2009 Dec 13.
9
Genetic variation in dopaminergic neuromodulation influences the ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions.多巴胺能神经调节中的基因变异会影响快速灵活地调整决策的能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 20;106(42):17951-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905191106. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
10
Expression of long-term plasticity at individual synapses in hippocampus is graded, bidirectional, and mainly presynaptic: optical quantal analysis.海马体中单个突触处长期可塑性的表达是分级的、双向的,且主要是突触前的:光学量子分析。
Neuron. 2009 Apr 30;62(2):242-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.026.