Wall P D H, Parsons N R, Parsons H, Achten J, Balasubramanian S, Thompson P, Costa M L
Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK .
Warwick Medical School, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):904-911. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B7.BJJ-2016-0767.R2. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a femoral nerve block and a periarticular infiltration in the management of early post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
A pragmatic, single centre, two arm parallel group, patient blinded, randomised controlled trial was undertaken. All patients due for TKA were eligible. Exclusion criteria included contraindications to the medications involved in the study and patients with a neurological abnormality of the lower limb. Patients received either a femoral nerve block with 75 mg of 0.25% levobupivacaine hydrochloride around the nerve, or periarticular infiltration with 150 mg of 0.25% levobupivacaine hydrochloride, 10 mg morphine sulphate, 30 mg ketorolac trometamol and 0.25 mg of adrenaline all diluted with 0.9% saline to make a volume of 150 ml.
A total of 264 patients were recruited and data from 230 (88%) were available for the primary analysis. Intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome measure of a visual analogue score for pain on the first post-operative day, prior to physiotherapy, was similar in both groups. The mean difference was -0.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) -5.9 to 4.5; p = 0.834). The periarticular group used less morphine in the first post-operative day compared with the femoral nerve block group (74%, 95% CI 55 to 99). The femoral nerve block group reported 39 adverse events, of which 27 were serious, in 31 patients and the periarticular group reported 51 adverse events, of which 38 were serious, in 42 patients up to six weeks post-operatively. None of the adverse events were directly attributed to either of the interventions under investigation.
Periarticular infiltration is a viable and safe alternative to femoral nerve block for the early post-operative relief of pain following TKA. Cite this article: 2017;99-B:904-11.
本研究旨在比较股神经阻滞和关节周围浸润在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后早期疼痛管理中的有效性。
进行了一项实用的、单中心、双臂平行组、患者盲法、随机对照试验。所有计划接受TKA的患者均符合条件。排除标准包括研究中所用药物的禁忌症以及下肢神经功能异常的患者。患者接受在神经周围注射75mg 0.25%盐酸左布比卡因的股神经阻滞,或接受用150mg 0.25%盐酸左布比卡因、10mg硫酸吗啡、30mg酮咯酸氨丁三醇和0.25mg肾上腺素并用0.9%生理盐水稀释至150ml的关节周围浸润。
共招募了264例患者,230例(88%)患者的数据可用于初步分析。两组在术后第一天物理治疗前疼痛视觉模拟评分这一主要结局指标的意向性分析结果相似。平均差异为-0.7(95%置信区间(CI)-5.9至4.5;p = 0.834)。与股神经阻滞组相比,关节周围浸润组在术后第一天使用的吗啡较少(74%,95%CI 55至99)。在术后六周内,股神经阻滞组的31例患者报告了39例不良事件,其中27例为严重不良事件,关节周围浸润组的42例患者报告了51例不良事件,其中38例为严重不良事件。没有不良事件直接归因于所研究的任何一种干预措施。
对于TKA术后早期疼痛缓解,关节周围浸润是股神经阻滞一种可行且安全的替代方法。引用本文:2017;99-B:904-11。