Honnannavar Kiran Abhayakumar, Mudakanagoudar Mahantesh Shivangouda
Department of Anaesthesiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):467-471. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_43_17.
Brachial plexus blockade is a time-tested technique for upper limb surgeries. The classical approach using paresthesia technique is a blind technique and may be associated with a higher failure rate and injury to the nerves and surrounding structures. To avoid some of these problems, use of peripheral nerve stimulator and ultrasound techniques were started which allowed better localization of the nerve/plexus. Ultrasound for supraclavicular brachial plexus block has improved the success rate of the block with excellent localization as well as improved safety margin. Hence, this study was planned for comparing the efficacy of conventional supraclavicular brachial plexus block with ultrasound-guided technique.
After obtaining the Institutional ethical committee approval and patient consent total of 60 patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and were randomly divided into two groups: US (Group US) and C (Group C). Both groups received 0.5% bupivacaine. The amount of local anesthetic injected calculated according to the body weight and was not crossing the toxic dosage (injection bupivacaine 2 mg/kg). The parameters compared between the two groups were lock execution time, time of onset of sensory and motor block, quality of sensory and motor block success rates were noted. The failed blocks were supplemented with general anesthesia.
Demographic data were comparable in both groups. The mean time taken for the procedure to administer a block by eliciting paresthesia is less compared to ultrasound, and it was statistically significant. The mean time of onset of motor block, sensory blockade, the duration of sensory and motor blockade was not statistically significant. The success rate of the block is more in ultrasound group than conventional group which was not clinically significant. The incidence of complications was seen more in conventional method.
Ultrasound guidance is the safe and effective method for the supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Incidence of complications are less as ultrasound provides real-time visulaization of underlying structures and the spread of local anaesthetic.
臂丛神经阻滞是一种经过时间考验的上肢手术技术。使用异感技术的经典方法是一种盲法,可能与较高的失败率以及神经和周围结构损伤相关。为避免其中一些问题,开始使用外周神经刺激器和超声技术,这使得神经/神经丛的定位更好。超声用于锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞提高了阻滞成功率,具有出色的定位以及更高的安全边际。因此,本研究旨在比较传统锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞与超声引导技术的疗效。
在获得机构伦理委员会批准和患者同意后,本前瞻性随机研究共纳入60例患者,并随机分为两组:超声组(US组)和传统组(C组)。两组均接受0.5%布比卡因。根据体重计算局部麻醉药注射量,且不超过中毒剂量(注射布比卡因2mg/kg)。比较两组之间的参数有阻滞执行时间、感觉和运动阻滞起效时间、感觉和运动阻滞质量、成功率,并记录失败的阻滞情况。失败的阻滞采用全身麻醉补充。
两组的人口统计学数据具有可比性。与超声相比,通过引出异感进行阻滞操作的平均时间更短,且具有统计学意义。运动阻滞、感觉阻滞的平均起效时间、感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间无统计学意义。超声组的阻滞成功率高于传统组,但无临床显著性差异。传统方法的并发症发生率更高。
超声引导是锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的安全有效方法。并发症发生率较低,因为超声可实时可视化深层结构和局部麻醉药的扩散情况。