Mehmeti Irsida, Nelaj Erida, Simaku Artan, Tomini Eugena, Bino Silva
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences/Catholic University Our Lady of Good Counsel, Str. Dritan Hoxha, Tirana, Albania.
Control of Infectious Diseases Department/Institute of Public Health, Str. Aleksander Moisiu, nr 80, Tirana, Albania.
Heliyon. 2017 Jun 20;3(6):e00331. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00331. eCollection 2017 Jun.
In Albania, the reporting of an adverse events following immunization (AEFI) is done not only by immunization providers but also from clinicians providing clinical treatment of AEFI in health posts, health centers and private or public hospitals. The AEFI reporting system in Albania has started in 2001 with the establishment of National Regulatory Authority of Vaccines in the Institute of Public Health. The most important problems of passive surveillance systems include underreporting, deficiency and inaccuracy of information. A structured questionnaire containing 68 questions constructed from immunization experts constituted the study tool. The questionnaire addressed health professionals working at child consultant's facilities and primary health centers in the district of Tirana. There were a total of 102 health professional interviewed. The majority of the respondents working at health centers in the district of Tirana in general, had poor knowledge levels on AEFI surveillance. The lowest score were received in knowledge about the role of different stakeholders involved in AEFI surveillance. The number of years practicing the profession did not influence in the total score of "practice and attitude toward reporting and managing an AEFI". Although the majority of health care professionals have encountered an AEFI during their practice (72/102, 70,5%), only half of them have never reported an AEFI (37/102, 36,2%). Barriers to reporting included lack of interest, unclear definition of AEFI and lack of awareness of what to report. Nevertheless, the main reason for not reporting was because a respondent thought he or she had not observed an AEFI in the last years (44,1%). Majority of the respondents did not have any training about AEFI (68,6%, 70/102). From this study it is concluded that it is necessary to develop training and educational programs in order to increase awareness of all health professionals involved in child health toward reporting of adverse events following immunization. It is necessary to build feedback systems to give information on AEFI. This study shows the influence of knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care workers in the surveillance of adverse events following immunization. Thus, information generated from this study might be valuable for the public health regulators to generate new guidelines about AEFI surveillance and update existing information.
在阿尔巴尼亚,免疫接种后不良事件(AEFI)的报告不仅由免疫接种提供者进行,在卫生站、健康中心以及私立或公立医院为AEFI提供临床治疗的临床医生也需报告。阿尔巴尼亚的AEFI报告系统始于2001年,当时在公共卫生研究所设立了国家疫苗监管局。被动监测系统最重要的问题包括报告不足、信息缺乏和不准确。一份由免疫专家构建的包含68个问题的结构化问卷构成了研究工具。该问卷面向在地拉那区儿童咨询机构和初级健康中心工作的卫生专业人员。总共采访了102名卫生专业人员。总体而言,在地拉那区健康中心工作的大多数受访者对AEFI监测的知识水平较差。在关于参与AEFI监测的不同利益相关者的作用的知识方面得分最低。从事该职业的年限对“报告和管理AEFI的实践与态度”的总分没有影响。尽管大多数卫生保健专业人员在其职业生涯中遇到过AEFI(72/102,70.5%),但只有一半的人从未报告过AEFI(37/102,36.2%)。报告的障碍包括缺乏兴趣、AEFI的定义不明确以及不知道该报告什么。然而,不报告的主要原因是受访者认为自己在过去几年中没有观察到AEFI(44.1%)。大多数受访者没有接受过任何关于AEFI的培训(68.6%,70/102)。从这项研究可以得出结论,有必要制定培训和教育计划,以提高所有参与儿童健康的卫生专业人员对免疫接种后不良事件报告的认识。有必要建立反馈系统以提供有关AEFI的信息。这项研究显示了卫生保健工作者的知识、认知和实践对免疫接种后不良事件监测的影响。因此,这项研究产生的信息可能对公共卫生监管机构制定关于AEFI监测的新指南和更新现有信息很有价值。