Lovén Ida, Steen Carlsson Katarina
Swedish Institute for Food and Agricultural Economics, Lund University, SE-220 07 Lund, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; Health Economics, SE-223 81 Lund, Sweden.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 30;14(7):712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070712.
Ill health in early life has a significant negative impact on school grades, grade repetition, educational level, and labor market outcomes. However, less is known about qualitative socio-economic consequences of a health shock in childhood or adolescence. We investigate the relationship between onset of type 1 diabetes up to age 15 and the probability of choosing and completing a health-oriented path at upper secondary and university level of education. We analyze the Swedish Childhood Diabetes Register, the National Educational Register, and other population registers in Sweden for 2756 people with type 1 diabetes and 10,020 matched population controls. Educational decisions are modeled as unsorted series of binary choices to assess the choice of educational field as a potential mechanism linking early life health to adult outcomes. The analyses reject the hypothesis of no systematic differences in choice of educational field between people with and without type 1 diabetes at both levels. The results are robust to selection on ability proxies and across sensitivity analysis. We conclude that the observed pro health-oriented educational choices among people with type 1 diabetes in our data are consistent with disease onset in childhood and adolescence having qualitative impact on life-course choices.
早年健康状况不佳会对学业成绩、留级情况、教育水平和劳动力市场结果产生重大负面影响。然而,对于童年或青少年时期健康冲击的定性社会经济后果,我们了解得较少。我们研究了15岁之前1型糖尿病的发病情况与在高中和大学教育阶段选择并完成以健康为导向路径的概率之间的关系。我们分析了瑞典儿童糖尿病登记册、国家教育登记册以及瑞典的其他人口登记册,涉及2756名1型糖尿病患者和10020名匹配的人口对照。教育决策被建模为一系列未排序的二元选择,以评估教育领域的选择作为将早年健康与成人结果联系起来的潜在机制。分析结果拒绝了在两个教育阶段,患1型糖尿病和未患1型糖尿病的人群在教育领域选择上不存在系统差异的假设。这些结果在基于能力代理进行选择以及经过敏感性分析后都很稳健。我们得出结论,在我们的数据中,1型糖尿病患者中观察到的倾向于以健康为导向的教育选择,与童年和青少年时期发病的疾病对人生历程选择产生定性影响是一致的。