• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methylation differences reveal heterogeneity in preterm pathophysiology: results from bipartite network analyses.甲基化差异揭示早产病理生理学中的异质性:二分网络分析结果
J Perinat Med. 2018 Jul 26;46(5):509-521. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0126.
2
Fetal DNA Methylation Associates with Early Spontaneous Preterm Birth and Gestational Age.胎儿DNA甲基化与早期自然早产及孕周相关。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e67489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067489. Print 2013.
3
DNA methylation provides insight into intergenerational risk for preterm birth in African Americans.DNA甲基化揭示了非裔美国人早产的代际风险。
Epigenetics. 2015;10(9):784-92. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1062964. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
4
Analysis of two birth tissues provides new insights into the epigenetic landscape of neonates born preterm.对两份出生组织的分析为早产儿的表观遗传景观提供了新的见解。
Clin Epigenetics. 2019 Feb 11;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0599-4.
5
6
Abnormal placental DNA methylation variation in spontaneous preterm birth.自发性早产中胎盘 DNA 甲基化变异异常。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(24):4704-4712. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1863357. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Fetal DNA methylation of autism spectrum disorders candidate genes: association with spontaneous preterm birth.自闭症谱系障碍候选基因的胎儿DNA甲基化:与自发性早产的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):533.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
8
DNA methylation changes in African American women with a history of preterm birth from the InterGEN study.非裔美国妇女中与早产史相关的 DNA 甲基化变化:来自 InterGEN 研究。
BMC Genom Data. 2021 Sep 5;22(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12863-021-00988-x.
9
DNA methylation: an epigenetic risk factor in preterm birth.DNA 甲基化:早产的表观遗传风险因素。
Reprod Sci. 2012 Jan;19(1):6-13. doi: 10.1177/1933719111424446.
10
Gestational tissue transcriptomics in term and preterm human pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.足月和早产人类妊娠中的妊娠组织转录组学:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med Genomics. 2015 Jun 5;8:27. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0099-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in the "All of Us" Program: Network Analysis and Visualization Study.“我们所有人”项目中健康的社会决定因素亚型分类:网络分析与可视化研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 11;27:e48775. doi: 10.2196/48775.
2
Subtyping Social Determinants of Health in : Network Analysis and Visualization Approach.《健康的社会决定因素亚型分析:网络分析与可视化方法》
medRxiv. 2023 Aug 11:2023.01.27.23285125. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.27.23285125.
3
The Pre-Adaptation of a Stroke-Specific Self-Management Program Among Older Adults.老年人脑卒中特定自我管理方案的预适应。
J Aging Health. 2023 Oct;35(9):632-642. doi: 10.1177/08982643231152520. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
4
A Framework for Modeling and Interpreting Patient Subgroups Applied to Hospital Readmission: Visual Analytical Approach.一种应用于医院再入院的患者亚组建模与解释框架:可视化分析方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Dec 7;10(12):e37239. doi: 10.2196/37239.
5
Prognostic Performance of Peripheral Blood Biomarkers in Identifying Seropositive Individuals at Risk of Developing Clinically Symptomatic Chagas Cardiomyopathy.外周血生物标志物在识别血清阳性且有发展为临床症状性克氏锥虫病心肌病风险个体中的预后性能。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Sep 3;9(1):e0036421. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00364-21. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
Racial and ethnic representation in epigenomic studies of preterm birth: a systematic review.种族和民族在早产的表观基因组研究中的代表性:系统综述。
Epigenomics. 2021 Nov;13(21):1735-1746. doi: 10.2217/epi-2020-0007. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
Epigenetic biomarkers and preterm birth.表观遗传生物标志物与早产
Environ Epigenet. 2020 Jun 14;6(1):dvaa005. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvaa005. eCollection 2020 Jan.
8
An epigenetic association of malformations, adverse reproductive outcomes, and fetal origins hypothesis related effects.畸形、不良生殖结局和胎儿起源假说相关效应的表观遗传关联。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jun;35(6):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1197-2. Epub 2018 May 9.

本文引用的文献

1
The association between interdelivery interval and adverse perinatal outcomes in a diverse US population.美国不同人群中分娩间隔与不良围产期结局之间的关联。
J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):593-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.54. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
2
Risk assessment and management to prevent preterm birth.预防早产的风险评估与管理。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Apr;21(2):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
3
Placental membrane aging and HMGB1 signaling associated with human parturition.胎盘膜老化与HMGB1信号传导和人类分娩相关。
Aging (Albany NY). 2016 Feb;8(2):216-30. doi: 10.18632/aging.100891.
4
Oxidative stress damage-associated molecular signaling pathways differentiate spontaneous preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of the membranes.氧化应激损伤相关分子信号通路可区分自发性早产和胎膜早破早产。
Mol Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;22(2):143-57. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gav074. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Racial Differences in the Performance of Existing Risk Prediction Models for Incident Type 2 Diabetes: The CARDIA Study.现有2型糖尿病发病风险预测模型性能的种族差异:CARDIA研究
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):285-91. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0509. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
6
The genetics of preterm birth: Progress and promise.早产的遗传学:进展与前景。
Semin Perinatol. 2015 Dec;39(8):574-83. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
7
How Comorbidities Co-Occur in Readmitted Hip Fracture Patients: From Bipartite Networks to Insights for Post-Discharge Planning.再入院髋部骨折患者共病如何同时出现:从二分网络到出院后规划的见解
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2015 Mar 25;2015:36-40. eCollection 2015.
8
DNA methylation provides insight into intergenerational risk for preterm birth in African Americans.DNA甲基化揭示了非裔美国人早产的代际风险。
Epigenetics. 2015;10(9):784-92. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1062964. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Chorioamniotic membrane senescence: a signal for parturition?绒毛羊膜膜衰老:分娩的信号?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):359.e1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 May 27.
10
Heterogeneity within and across Pediatric Pulmonary Infections: From Bipartite Networks to At-Risk Subphenotypes.儿科肺部感染内部及之间的异质性:从二分网络到风险亚表型
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2014 Apr 7;2014:29-34. eCollection 2014.

甲基化差异揭示早产病理生理学中的异质性:二分网络分析结果

Methylation differences reveal heterogeneity in preterm pathophysiology: results from bipartite network analyses.

作者信息

Bhavnani Suresh K, Dang Bryant, Kilaru Varun, Caro Maria, Visweswaran Shyam, Saade George, Smith Alicia K, Menon Ramkumar

机构信息

Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, 6.168 Research Building 6, Galveston, TX, USA.

Institute for Translational Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2018 Jul 26;46(5):509-521. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0126.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2017-0126
PMID:28665803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5971156/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that epigenetic differences can increase the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). However, little is known about heterogeneity underlying such epigenetic differences, which could lead to hypotheses for biological pathways in specific patient subgroups, and corresponding targeted interventions critical for precision medicine. Using bipartite network analysis of fetal DNA methylation data we demonstrate a novel method for classification of PTB.

METHODS

The data consisted of DNA methylation across the genome (HumanMethylation450 BeadChip) in cord blood from 50 African-American subjects consisting of 22 cases of early spontaneous PTB (24-34 weeks of gestation) and 28 controls (>39 weeks of gestation). These data were analyzed using a combination of (1) a supervised method to select the top 10 significant methylation sites, (2) unsupervised "subject-variable" bipartite networks to visualize and quantitatively analyze how those 10 methylation sites co-occurred across all the subjects, and across only the cases with the goal of analyzing subgroups and their underlying pathways, and (3) a simple linear regression to test whether there was an association between the total methylation in the cases, and gestational age.

RESULTS

The bipartite network analysis of all subjects and significant methylation sites revealed statistically significant clustering consisting of an inverse symmetrical relationship in the methylation profiles between a case-enriched subgroup and a control-enriched subgroup: the former was predominantly hypermethylated across seven methylation sites, and hypomethylated across three methylation sites, whereas the latter was predominantly hypomethylated across the above seven methylation sites and hypermethylated across the three methylation sites. Furthermore, the analysis of only cases revealed one subgroup that was predominantly hypomethylated across seven methylation sites, and another subgroup that was hypomethylated across all methylation sites suggesting the presence of heterogeneity in PTB pathophysiology. Finally, the analysis found a strong inverse linear relationship between total methylation and gestational age suggesting that methylation differences could be used as predictive markers for gestational length.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that unsupervised bipartite networks helped to identify a complex but comprehensible data-driven hypotheses related to patient subgroups and inferences about their underlying pathways, and therefore were an effective complement to supervised approaches currently used.

摘要

背景

近期研究表明,表观遗传差异会增加自发性早产(PTB)的风险。然而,对于这些表观遗传差异背后的异质性知之甚少,而异质性可能会引出特定患者亚组中生物学途径的假设以及对精准医学至关重要的相应靶向干预措施。通过对胎儿DNA甲基化数据进行二分网络分析,我们展示了一种用于PTB分类的新方法。

方法

数据包括来自50名非裔美国受试者脐带血中全基因组的DNA甲基化(HumanMethylation450 BeadChip),其中包括22例早期自发性PTB(妊娠24 - 34周)病例和28名对照(妊娠>39周)。这些数据通过以下方法进行分析:(1)一种监督方法,用于选择前10个显著的甲基化位点;(2)无监督的“受试者 - 变量”二分网络,以可视化和定量分析这10个甲基化位点在所有受试者中以及仅在病例中的共现情况,目的是分析亚组及其潜在途径;(3)简单线性回归,以测试病例中的总甲基化与胎龄之间是否存在关联。

结果

对所有受试者和显著甲基化位点的二分网络分析揭示了具有统计学意义的聚类,在病例富集亚组和对照富集亚组之间的甲基化谱中存在反对称关系:前者在七个甲基化位点上主要为高甲基化,在三个甲基化位点上为低甲基化,而后者在上述七个甲基化位点上主要为低甲基化,在三个甲基化位点上为高甲基化。此外,仅对病例的分析揭示了一个亚组在七个甲基化位点上主要为低甲基化,另一个亚组在所有甲基化位点上均为低甲基化,这表明PTB病理生理学中存在异质性。最后,分析发现总甲基化与胎龄之间存在强烈的负线性关系,这表明甲基化差异可作为妊娠长度的预测标志物。

结论

结果表明无监督二分网络有助于识别与患者亚组相关的复杂但可理解的数据驱动假设及其潜在途径的推断,因此是当前使用的监督方法的有效补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/8365d633ba19/nihms968758f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/2843e96938ee/nihms968758f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/7f31a7bd11df/nihms968758f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/ae25cc8213b3/nihms968758f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/bb908cbce856/nihms968758f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/8365d633ba19/nihms968758f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/2843e96938ee/nihms968758f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/7f31a7bd11df/nihms968758f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/ae25cc8213b3/nihms968758f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/bb908cbce856/nihms968758f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/188c/5971156/8365d633ba19/nihms968758f5.jpg