Lucock Mike, Barkham Michael, Donohoe Gillian, Kellett Stephen, McMillan Dean, Mullaney Sarah, Sainty Andrew, Saxon David, Thwaites Richard, Delgadillo Jaime
University of Huddersfield, Harold Wilson Building, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK.
South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Nov;44(6):919-931. doi: 10.1007/s10488-017-0810-5.
Practice research networks (PRNs) can support the implementation of evidence based practice in routine services and generate practice based evidence. This paper describes the structure, processes and learning from a new PRN in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme in England, in relation to an implementation framework and using one study as a case example. Challenges related to: ethics and governance processes; communications with multiple stakeholders; competing time pressures and linking outcome data. Enablers included: early tangible outputs and impact; a collaborative approach; engaging with local research leads; clarity of processes; effective dissemination; and committed leadership.
实践研究网络（PRNs）可以支持在常规服务中实施循证实践，并生成基于实践的证据。本文描述了英格兰改善心理治疗可及性计划中一个新的PRN的结构、流程及经验教训，涉及一个实施框架，并以一项研究为例。相关挑战包括：伦理和治理流程；与多个利益相关者的沟通；相互竞争的时间压力以及结果数据的关联。促成因素包括：早期切实的产出和影响；协作方法；与当地研究负责人合作；流程清晰；有效传播；以及坚定的领导力。
