• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的人对治疗的反应不同:一项使用患者特征分析和风险分层的示范研究。

Different people respond differently to therapy: A demonstration using patient profiling and risk stratification.

作者信息

Delgadillo Jaime, Moreea Omar, Lutz Wolfgang

机构信息

Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK.

Centre for Clinical Practice, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2016 Apr;79:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2016.02.003
PMID:26937855
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with poor outcomes in psychological therapy, and to develop a patient profiling method.

METHOD

Clinical assessment data for 1347 outpatients was analysed. Final treatment outcome was based on reliable and clinically significant improvement (RCSI) in depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) measures. Thirteen patient characteristics were explored as potential outcome predictors using logistic regression in a cross-validation design.

RESULTS

Disability, employment status, age, functional impairment, baseline depression and outcome expectancy predicted post-treatment RCSI. Regression coefficients for these factors were used to derive a weighting scheme called Leeds Risk Index (LRI), used to assign risk scores to individual cases. After stratifying cases into three levels of LRI scores, we found significant differences in RCSI and treatment completion rates. Furthermore, LRI scores were significantly correlated with the proportion of treatment sessions classified as 'not on track'.

CONCLUSIONS

The LRI tool can identify cases at risk of poor progress to inform personalized treatment recommendations for low and high intensity psychological interventions.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定与心理治疗效果不佳相关的患者特征,并开发一种患者特征分析方法。

方法

分析了1347名门诊患者的临床评估数据。最终治疗结果基于抑郁症(PHQ-9)和焦虑症(GAD-7)测量中的可靠且具有临床意义的改善(RCSI)。在交叉验证设计中,使用逻辑回归探索了13个患者特征作为潜在的结果预测因素。

结果

残疾、就业状况、年龄、功能损害、基线抑郁和结果期望预测了治疗后的RCSI。这些因素的回归系数用于得出一种称为利兹风险指数(LRI)的加权方案,用于为个体病例分配风险分数。将病例分为三个LRI分数水平后,我们发现RCSI和治疗完成率存在显著差异。此外,LRI分数与被归类为“未步入正轨”的治疗疗程比例显著相关。

结论

LRI工具可以识别进展不佳风险的病例,为低强度和高强度心理干预的个性化治疗建议提供依据。

相似文献

1
Different people respond differently to therapy: A demonstration using patient profiling and risk stratification.不同的人对治疗的反应不同:一项使用患者特征分析和风险分层的示范研究。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Apr;79:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Early changes, attrition, and dose-response in low intensity psychological interventions.低强度心理干预的早期变化、损耗和剂量反应。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2014 Mar;53(1):114-30. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12031. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
3
Feasibility and utility of screening for depression and anxiety disorders in patients with cardiovascular disease.对心血管疾病患者进行抑郁和焦虑症筛查的可行性及实用性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jul;6(4):498-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000049. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
4
Two-year course of depressive and anxiety disorders: results from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA).抑郁和焦虑障碍的两年病程:来自荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)的结果。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Sep;133(1-2):76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
5
Diagnostic indicators of anxiety and depression in older dizzy patients in primary care.基层医疗中老年头晕患者焦虑和抑郁的诊断指标。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2011 Jun;24(2):98-107. doi: 10.1177/0891988711405332.
6
Psychometric evaluation and normative data for a Swedish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire 15-Item Somatic Symptom Severity Scale.瑞典版患者健康问卷 15 项躯体症状严重程度量表的心理计量学评估和常模数据。
Scand J Psychol. 2013 Apr;54(2):112-7. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12029. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
Predicting treatment outcome in psychological treatment services by identifying latent profiles of patients.通过识别患者的潜在特征来预测心理治疗服务中的治疗结果。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jun;197:107-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
Which factors predict the persistence of DSM-IV depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders in the medically ill three months post hospital discharge?哪些因素可预测患有躯体疾病的患者在出院后三个月内 DSM-IV 抑郁、焦虑和躯体形式障碍的持续存在?
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Jan;68(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.004.
9
The trajectories of adolescent anxiety and depressive symptoms over the course of a transdiagnostic treatment.青少年焦虑和抑郁症状在跨诊断治疗过程中的轨迹。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Aug;28(6):511-21. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
Prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with cystic fibrosis based on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 screening questionnaires.基于PHQ-9和GAD-7筛查问卷的成年囊性纤维化患者抑郁和焦虑症状的患病率
Psychosomatics. 2015 Jul-Aug;56(4):345-53. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.巴西精神卫生保健需求评估量表(CuidaSM):初级卫生保健中的效度证据
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0323833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323833. eCollection 2025.
2
Synthetic data in medicine: Legal and ethical considerations for patient profiling.医学中的合成数据:患者画像的法律和伦理考量
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025 May 29;28:190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.05.026. eCollection 2025.
3
Strategies to Reduce Hospital Length of Stay: Evidence and Challenges.
缩短住院时间的策略:证据与挑战
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 20;61(5):922. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050922.
4
Statistical methods to adjust for the effects on intervention compliance in randomized clinical trials where precision treatment rules are being developed.在正在制定精准治疗规则的随机临床试验中,用于调整对干预依从性影响的统计方法。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2025 Mar;34(1):e70005. doi: 10.1002/mpr.70005.
5
Predicting optimal treatment allocation for cognitive analytic-guided self-help versus cognitive behavioural-guided self-help.预测认知分析指导自助与认知行为指导自助的最佳治疗分配。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):355-370. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12508. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
6
Exploring Client Preferences for Psychological Counselors in a Chinese Online Health Community: Longitudinal Study.探索中国在线健康社区中客户对心理辅导员的偏好:纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 10;26:e58428. doi: 10.2196/58428.
7
Prediction of adolescent psychotherapy outcomes using youth- and caregiver-reported symptoms data.利用青少年和照顾者报告的症状数据预测青少年心理治疗结果。
Psychother Res. 2024 Aug 30:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2394187.
8
Who Benefits from Acute Psychiatric Home Treatment? A Systematic Review.谁从急性精神病院外治疗中获益?系统综述。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Oct;60(7):1408-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01297-0. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
9
Comparing clinical decision-making of AI technology to a multi-professional care team in an electronic cognitive behavioural therapy program for depression: protocol.在一项针对抑郁症的电子认知行为疗法项目中,将人工智能技术的临床决策与多专业护理团队的临床决策进行比较:方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 21;14:1220607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1220607. eCollection 2023.
10
Precision Mental Health and Data-Informed Decision Support in Psychological Therapy: An Example.精准心理健康与数据驱动的心理治疗决策支持:一个实例。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Sep;51(5):674-685. doi: 10.1007/s10488-023-01330-6. Epub 2023 Dec 15.