Stiller Christine, Brandt Lindsay, Adams Megan, Gura Nathan
Human Movement Science/Physical Therapy, Oakland University, Rochester Hills, USA.
Physical Therapy, OMPT Specialists Physical Therapy, Royal Oak, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 20;16(2):e54525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54525. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Introduction Printed patient educational materials (PEM) are often written above the recommended sixth- to eighth-grade reading levels, resulting in decreased client understanding and subsequent poor health literacy. Researchers have demonstrated that it is possible to improve readability to enhance clients' understanding and health literacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the readability of physical therapy (PT) PEM with and without modifications for improvement. Methods A convenience sample of 38 PT PEM of at least 10 sentences was obtained from a large suburban hospital system in the Midwestern region of the United States. Original and three modified versions (exclusion, revision, and combined exclusion/revision of words with >3 syllables) of the documents were assessed with the Simple Measure of "Gobbledygook" (SMOG). All document means were compared to the recommended reading levels, and the original document means were compared with modified conditions. Results A majority of the documents were above an eighth-grade reading level. All modified conditions resulted in statistically significant reading level decreases, but only the combined modified condition decreased to the eighth-grade level. Conclusion Even with modifications, most PEM were above the recommended reading levels. Additional methods for improving readability and increased education about health literacy for healthcare professionals may be necessary to improve client comprehension.
引言 印刷版患者教育材料(PEM)的编写水平通常高于推荐的六年级至八年级阅读水平,导致患者理解度降低,进而健康素养较差。研究人员已证明,提高可读性以增强患者理解度和健康素养是可行的。本研究的目的是评估物理治疗(PT)PEM在修改与未修改情况下的可读性,以进行改进。方法 从美国中西部地区的一个大型郊区医院系统中获取了38份至少包含10个句子的PT PEM作为便利样本。使用“天书简测法”(SMOG)对文档的原始版本和三个修改版本(排除、修订以及合并排除/修订三个或三个以上音节的单词)进行评估。将所有文档的均值与推荐阅读水平进行比较,并将原始文档的均值与修改后的情况进行比较。结果 大多数文档的阅读水平高于八年级。所有修改后的情况均导致阅读水平在统计学上显著下降,但只有合并修改后的情况降至八年级水平。结论 即使经过修改,大多数PEM的阅读水平仍高于推荐水平。可能需要其他提高可读性的方法,并加强对医疗保健专业人员的健康素养教育,以提高患者的理解能力。