• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线心血管疾病相关健康教育材料的可读性分析

A Readability Analysis of Online Cardiovascular Disease-Related Health Education Materials.

作者信息

Ayyaswami Varun, Padmanabhan Divya, Patel Manthan, Prabhu Arpan Vaikunth, Hansberry David R, Agarwal Nitin, Magnani Jared W

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine.

University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine.

出版信息

Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Apr;3(2):e74-e80. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190306-03. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

DOI:10.3928/24748307-20190306-03
PMID:31049489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6489118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online cardiovascular health materials are easily accessible with an Internet connection, but the readability of its content may limit practical use by patients.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of our study was to assess the readability of the most commonly searched Internet health education materials for cardiovascular diseases accessed via Google.

METHODS

We selected 20 commonly searched cardiovascular disease terms: aneurysm, angina, atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack, heart failure, high blood pressure, pericardial disease, peripheral arterial disease, rheumatic heart disease, stroke, sudden death, valvular heart disease, mini-stroke, lower extremity edema, pulmonary embolism, and exertional dyspnea. Terms were selected on Google and selected up to 10 results in order of presentation in the search results by reviewing a maximum of 15 pages of Google search results specifically providing education toward patients to yield 196 total patient education articles.

KEY RESULTS

All readability measures assessing grade level measures found the 196 articles were written at a mean 10.9 ( = 1.8) grade reading level. Moreover, 99.5% of the articles were written beyond the 5th- to 6th-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the prominent use of online patient education material, we consider readability as a quality metric that should be evaluated prior to online publication of any health education materials. Further study of how to improve the readability of online materials may enhance patient education, engagement, and health outcomes.

摘要

背景

只需连接互联网,就能轻松获取在线心血管健康资料,但其内容的可读性可能会限制患者的实际使用。

目的

我们研究的目的是评估通过谷歌搜索获取的最常见的心血管疾病互联网健康教育资料的可读性。

方法

我们选取了20个常见的心血管疾病搜索词:动脉瘤、心绞痛、动脉粥样硬化、心肌病、先天性心脏病、冠状动脉疾病、深静脉血栓形成、心脏病发作、心力衰竭、高血压、心包疾病、外周动脉疾病、风湿性心脏病、中风、猝死、心脏瓣膜病、小中风、下肢水肿、肺栓塞和劳力性呼吸困难。在谷歌上选择这些搜索词,并按搜索结果中的呈现顺序选取最多10个结果,通过查看最多15页专门为患者提供教育的谷歌搜索结果,共得到196篇患者教育文章。

主要结果

所有评估年级水平的可读性指标显示,这196篇文章的平均阅读年级水平为10.9(标准差 = 1.8)。此外,99.5%的文章的写作水平超过了美国医学协会推荐的五至六年级水平。

结论

鉴于在线患者教育资料的广泛使用,我们认为可读性是一个质量指标,在任何健康教育资料在线发布之前都应进行评估。进一步研究如何提高在线资料的可读性可能会增强患者教育、参与度和健康结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/487ec676cbd2/hlrp-3-74-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/f39673bd9585/hlrp-3-74-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/faa220eb3314/hlrp-3-74-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/487ec676cbd2/hlrp-3-74-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/f39673bd9585/hlrp-3-74-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/faa220eb3314/hlrp-3-74-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8299/6607765/487ec676cbd2/hlrp-3-74-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Readability Analysis of Online Cardiovascular Disease-Related Health Education Materials.在线心血管疾病相关健康教育材料的可读性分析
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Apr;3(2):e74-e80. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190306-03. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
2
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.心脏杂音在线教育资料的质量、易懂性、可理解性和普及性。
Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
3
Readability of patient education material in stroke: a systematic literature review.中风患者教育材料的可读性:一项系统的文献综述。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 May;31(4):345-360. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2023.2259177. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
4
Readability of Online Patient Educational Materials for Coronary Artery Calcium Scans and Implications for Health Disparities.在线冠状动脉钙扫描患者教育材料的易读性及其对健康差异的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep 15;9(18):e017372. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017372. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
5
Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.青光眼在线患者教育资料的可读性。
J Glaucoma. 2022 Jun 1;31(6):438-442. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002012. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Readability of Spanish-Language Online Patient Educational Materials for Peripheral Artery Disease Do Not Meet Recommended Standards and Represent a Literacy Barrier to Care.西班牙语在线外周动脉疾病患者教育材料的可读性不符合推荐标准,代表了患者获取医疗服务的读写能力障碍。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.029. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
7
Readability assessment of online peripheral artery disease education materials.在线外周动脉疾病教育材料的可读性评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;76(6):1728-1732. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.022. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
8
Health Literacy in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Quantitative Assessment of the Understandability and Readability of Online Patient Education Material.肩关镜手术中的健康素养:对在线患者教育材料的可理解性和可读性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):151-158.
9
Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources.基于在线急诊放射学的患者教育资源可读性水平的定量分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1566-7. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
10
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the Readability of Institutional Heart Failure-Related Patient Education Materials Using GPT-4: Observational Study.使用GPT-4提高机构性心力衰竭相关患者教育材料的可读性:观察性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Jul 8;9:e68817. doi: 10.2196/68817.
2
Development of an Audiovisual Tool on Peripheral Arterial Disease and Preliminary Suitability Assessment.外周动脉疾病视听工具的开发及初步适用性评估
Port J Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;42(3):184-194. doi: 10.1159/000539072. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Peripheral Artery Disease Education: A Battle Between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and readability of online information about type 2 diabetes and nutrition.关于2型糖尿病与营养的在线信息的质量和可读性。
JAAPA. 2018 Nov;31(11):41-44. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000546481.02560.4e.
2
Online Patient Education Materials for Orthognathic Surgery Fail to Meet Readability and Quality Standards.正颌外科手术的在线患者教育材料未达到可读性和质量标准。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;77(1):180.e1-180.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.033. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Health Literacy and Cardiovascular Disease: Fundamental Relevance to Primary and Secondary Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
外周动脉疾病教育中的人工智能:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的较量
Cureus. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e85174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85174. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
A Readability Analysis of Online Patient Education Materials Regarding Fibula Free Flap Surgery.关于游离腓骨瓣手术的在线患者教育材料的可读性分析
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Jul 23:22925503241263354. doi: 10.1177/22925503241263354.
5
Assessing readability and comprehension of web-based patient education materials by American Heart Association (AHA) and CardioSmart online platform by American College of Cardiology (ACC): How useful are these websites for patient understanding?评估美国心脏协会(AHA)和美国心脏病学会(ACC)的CardioSmart在线平台上基于网络的患者教育材料的可读性和理解度:这些网站对患者理解有多大帮助?
Am Heart J Plus. 2023 Jul 12;32:100308. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100308. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Health Literacy Analytics of Accessible Patient Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine: What are Patients Wanting to Know?心血管医学中可获取患者资源的健康素养分析:患者想了解什么?
Kans J Med. 2023 Dec 31;16(3):309-315. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20554. eCollection 2023.
7
Heart Disease Knowledge and Awareness in African American and Hispanic Women.非裔美国女性和西班牙裔女性的心脏病知识和意识。
South Med J. 2023 Oct;116(10):783-789. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001610.
8
Health Information on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis From Search Engines and Twitter: Readability Analysis.搜索引擎和 Twitter 上的暴露前预防健康信息:可读性分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Sep 4;9:e48630. doi: 10.2196/48630.
9
Assessing the Readability and Quality of Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Websites in Michigan.评估密歇根州心脏康复项目网站的可读性和质量。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2023 Nov 1;43(6):E23-E25. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000817. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
10
Evidence-based health information about pulmonary embolism: Assessing the quality, usability and readability of online and offline patient information.关于肺栓塞的循证健康信息:评估在线和离线患者信息的质量、可用性及可读性。
PEC Innov. 2022 Nov 15;1:100103. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100103. eCollection 2022 Dec.
健康素养与心血管疾病:初级和二级预防的基本相关性:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2018 Jul 10;138(2):e48-e74. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000579. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Quantitative analysis of the level of readability of online emergency radiology-based patient education resources.基于在线急诊放射学的患者教育资源可读性水平的定量分析。
Emerg Radiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1566-7. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
5
Readability of online allergy and immunology educational resources for patients: Implications for physicians.面向患者的在线过敏与免疫学教育资源的可读性:对医生的启示
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):286-288.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
6
Assessing reading levels of health information: uses and limitations of flesch formula.评估健康信息的阅读水平:弗莱什公式的用途及局限性
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):84-88. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.210517.
7
Radiology Online Patient Education Materials Provided by Major University Hospitals: Do They Conform to NIH and AMA Guidelines?大型大学医院提供的放射学在线患者教育材料:它们是否符合美国国立卫生研究院和美国医学协会的指南?
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Mar-Apr;47(2):75-79. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Education Material on Congestive Heart Failure.充血性心力衰竭在线患者教育材料的可读性评估
Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317. doi: 10.1155/2017/9780317. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
9
Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性
Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
10
An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.病理学相关患者教育文章的在线可读性分析:病理学家教育患者的契机。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 10.