Allen Keith B, Chhatriwalla Adnan K, Cohen David J, Saxon John T, Aggarwal Sanjeev, Hart Anthony, Baron Suzanne, Davis J Russell, Pak Alex F, Dvir Danny, Borkon A Michael
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov;104(5):1501-1508. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement is less effective in small surgical bioprostheses. We evaluated the feasibility of bioprosthetic valve fracture with a high-pressure balloon to facilitate valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
In vitro bench testing on aortic tissue valves was performed on 19-mm and 21-mm Mitroflow (Sorin, Milan, Italy), Magna and Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), Trifecta and Biocor Epic (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN), and Hancock II and Mosaic (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). High-pressure balloons Tru Dilation, Atlas Gold, and Dorado (C.R. Bard, Murray Hill, NJ) were used to determine which valves could be fractured and at what pressure fracture occurred.
Mitroflow, Magna, Magna Ease, Mosaic, and Biocor Epic surgical valves were successfully fractured using high-pressures balloon 1 mm larger than the labeled valve size whereas Trifecta and Hancock II surgical valves could not be fractured. Only the internal valve frame was fractured, and the sewing cuff was never disrupted. Manufacturer's rated burst pressures for balloons were exceeded, with fracture pressures ranging from 8 to 24 atmospheres depending on the surgical valve. Testing further demonstrated that fracture facilitated the expansion of previously constrained, underexpanded transcatheter valves (both balloon and self-expanding) to the manufacturer's recommended size.
Bench testing demonstrates that the frame of most, but not all, bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves can be fractured using high-pressure balloons. The safety of bioprosthetic valve fracture to optimize valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in small surgical valves requires further clinical investigation.
在小型外科生物瓣膜中,瓣中瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术的效果较差。我们评估了使用高压球囊使生物瓣膜破裂以促进瓣中瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术的可行性。
对19毫米和21毫米的Mitroflow(索林集团,米兰,意大利)、麦格纳和麦格纳易心(爱德华兹生命科学公司,尔湾,加利福尼亚州)、Trifecta和Biocor Epic(圣犹达医疗公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)以及汉考克II和马赛克(美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,明尼苏达州)的主动脉组织瓣膜进行体外实验台测试。使用Tru Dilation、Atlas Gold和Dorado(巴德公司,默里山,新泽西州)高压球囊来确定哪些瓣膜可以破裂以及在何种压力下发生破裂。
使用比标记瓣膜尺寸大1毫米的高压球囊成功使Mitroflow、麦格纳、麦格纳易心、马赛克和Biocor Epic外科瓣膜破裂,而Trifecta和汉考克II外科瓣膜无法破裂。仅内部瓣膜框架破裂,缝合袖口从未受损。球囊的制造商额定爆破压力被超过,破裂压力根据外科瓣膜不同在8至24个大气压之间。测试进一步表明,破裂有助于先前受限制、扩张不足的经导管瓣膜(球囊扩张型和自膨胀型)扩张至制造商推荐尺寸。
实验台测试表明,大多数(但并非全部)生物人工心脏主动脉瓣膜的框架可以使用高压球囊破裂。生物瓣膜破裂以优化小型外科瓣膜中的瓣中瓣经导管主动脉瓣置换术的安全性需要进一步的临床研究。