• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams.护理过程自我评价工具:一种有效且可靠的工具,用于衡量医疗保健团队的护理过程组织。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:325. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-325.
2
Development and validation of a care process self-evaluation tool.一种护理流程自我评估工具的开发与验证
Health Serv Manage Res. 2007 Aug;20(3):189-202. doi: 10.1258/095148407781395964.
3
Do pathways lead to better organized care processes?路径是否通向更有条理的护理流程?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;15(5):782-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01068.x.
4
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool.挪威版护理过程自我评估工具的心理测量特性。
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):804-811. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1203766. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Development and psychometric properties of a scale for measuring internal participation from a patient and health care professional perspective.从患者和医疗保健专业人员的角度出发,开发并验证了一种用于衡量内部参与度的量表的心理测量学特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 1;13:374. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-374.
6
Patient perspectives on continuity of care: adaption and preliminary psychometric assessment of a Norwegian version of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ-N).患者对医疗连续性的看法:挪威版奈梅亨连续性问卷(NCQ-N)的改编及初步心理测量评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):760. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2706-1.
7
Psychometrics properties of the Team Interaction Scale and influencing factors of team interaction of tertiary hospital physicians in China: a cross-sectional study.中国三甲医院医师团队互动量表的心理测量学特性及团队互动影响因素的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e026162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026162.
8
Better organized care via care pathways: A multicenter study.通过护理路径实现更有序的护理:一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180398. eCollection 2017.
9
How to measure experiences of healthcare quality in Denmark among patients with heart disease? The development and psychometric evaluation of a patient-reported instrument.如何衡量丹麦心脏病患者的医疗质量体验?一种患者报告工具的开发与心理测量评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 30;7(10):e016234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016234.
10
Evaluation of the impact of a clinical pathway on the organization of a multidisciplinary dental sleep clinic.评估临床路径对多学科牙科睡眠诊所组织的影响。
Sleep Breath. 2014 May;18(2):325-34. doi: 10.1007/s11325-013-0888-2. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Family-Centered Care to Promote Inpatient Safety: An Exploration of Nursing Care and Management Processes.以患者和家庭为中心的护理以促进住院安全:护理与管理流程探索
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):260. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070260.
2
Design and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure Interprofessional Collaborative Practice for Auditing Integrated Hospital Care: Empirical Research.用于审核综合医院护理的跨专业协作实践测量问卷的设计与验证:实证研究
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2024 Jul 1;44(3):171-179. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000544. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Integrated Maternal Care Strategies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.低收入和中等收入国家的综合孕产妇保健策略:一项系统综述
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Jun 22;22(2):26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6254. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
4
Developing a dementia inclusive hospital environment using an Integrated Care Pathway design: research protocol.采用综合护理路径设计打造包容痴呆症患者的医院环境:研究方案
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 14;9:e11589. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11589. eCollection 2021.
5
Arts-Based Interventions for Professionals in Caring Roles During and After Crisis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.危机期间及之后针对从事护理工作的专业人员的艺术干预:文献系统综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 22;11:589744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589744. eCollection 2020.
6
Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives: A Case Study of the Lung Cancer Integrated Care Pathway.患者与医疗保健专业人员视角:肺癌综合护理路径的案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Oct 31;18(4):7. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3972.
7
Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review.过渡患者安全中使用的测量工具和结果测量指标; 系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 4;13(6):e0197312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197312. eCollection 2018.
8
Better organized care via care pathways: A multicenter study.通过护理路径实现更有序的护理:一项多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 3;12(7):e0180398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180398. eCollection 2017.
9
Remediation Methods for Milestones Related to Interpersonal and Communication Skills and Professionalism.人际交往与沟通技巧及职业素养相关里程碑的补救方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Feb;8(1):18-23. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00060.1.
10
Main barriers to effective implementation of stroke care pathways in France: a qualitative study.法国有效实施中风护理路径的主要障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 28;14:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-95.

本文引用的文献

1
The European quality of care pathways (EQCP) study on the impact of care pathways on interprofessional teamwork in an acute hospital setting: study protocol: for a cluster randomised controlled trial and evaluation of implementation processes.欧洲护理路径质量研究(EQCP)关于在急性医院环境中护理路径对跨专业团队合作的影响的研究方案:一项集群随机对照试验和实施过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2012 May 18;7:47. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-47.
2
Care pathways lead to better teamwork: results of a systematic review.护理路径促进更好的团队合作:一项系统评价的结果
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(2):264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
3
Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States.患者安全、满意度和医院护理质量:欧洲和美国 12 个国家的护士和患者的横断面调查。
BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1717.
4
Communication skills training for health care professionals improves the adult orthopaedic patient's experience of quality of care.为医疗保健专业人员提供沟通技巧培训可改善成年骨科患者对护理质量的体验。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Dec;26(4):698-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00982.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
5
Professional autonomy, collaboration with physicians, and moral distress among European intensive care nurses.欧洲重症监护护士的专业自主性、与医生的合作和道德困境。
Am J Crit Care. 2012 Mar;21(2):e41-52. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012205.
6
Is variation in the content of care pathways leading to quality and patient safety problems?护理路径内容的差异会导致质量和患者安全问题吗?
Hip Int. 2011 Nov-Dec;21(6):770-1. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8844.
7
Interdisciplinary teamwork in hospitals: a review and practical recommendations for improvement.医院中的跨学科团队合作:综述与改进的实用建议
J Hosp Med. 2012 Jan;7(1):48-54. doi: 10.1002/jhm.970. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
8
Important variations in the content of care pathway documents for total knee arthroplasty may lead to quality and patient safety problems.全膝关节置换术护理路径文档内容的重要差异可能导致质量和患者安全问题。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Feb;19(1):11-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01760.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
9
Improving perceptions of teamwork climate with the Veterans Health Administration medical team training program.通过退伍军人健康管理局医疗团队培训计划改善对团队合作氛围的认知。
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):480-4. doi: 10.1177/1062860611401653. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
10
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.“全球触发工具”显示,医院中的不良事件可能比之前测量的高出十倍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.

护理过程自我评价工具:一种有效且可靠的工具,用于衡量医疗保健团队的护理过程组织。

The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Center for Health Services and Nursing Research, University of Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 4th Floor, Leuven B-3000, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:325. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-325.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-325
PMID:23958206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table.

METHODS

The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann-Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated.

RESULTS

CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach's alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams.

摘要

背景

通过改善医疗服务的组织形式,可以提高患者的安全性。一种可以评估多学科团队对实际医疗服务组织情况感知的工具是护理过程自我评估工具(CPSET)。CPSET 于 2007 年开发,包含五个分量表的 29 个项目:(a)以患者为中心的组织;(b)护理过程的协调;(c)与初级保健的协作;(d)与患者和家属的沟通;(e)护理过程的随访。本研究的目的是进一步评估 CPSET 在团队和医院层面的心理测量学特性,并编制一个截断分数表。

方法

在比利时和荷兰的多中心研究中评估了 CPSET 的心理测量学特性。共有 114 家医院的 3139 名团队成员参与了研究。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)、克朗巴赫α系数、组内相关系数(ICC)、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和曼-惠特尼检验评估 CPSET 的心理测量学特性。使用百分位数编制截断分数表。同时还评估了人口统计学变量。

结果

CFA 显示出良好的模型拟合度:标准化拟合指数为 0.93,比较拟合指数为 0.94,调整后的拟合优度指数为 0.87,均方根误差近似值为 0.06。克朗巴赫α值在 0.869 到 0.950 之间。团队层面的 ICC 值在 0.127 到 0.232 之间,高于医院层面的 ICC 值(0.071-0.151)。男性团队成员在 5 个分量表中的 2 个和 CPSET 的整体评分上的得分显著高于女性。不同年龄组之间也存在显著差异。医生在 5 个分量表中的 4 个和 CPSET 的整体评分上的得分显著高于其他人员。护理过程协调员在 5 个分量表中的 2 个和 CPSET 的整体评分上的得分显著低于其他人员。计算了所有分量表和 CPSET 的整体的截断分数。

结论

CPSET 是一种有效的、可靠的工具,可用于评估医疗团队对护理过程组织程度的感知。通过使用截断分数表,团队可以将自身对护理过程组织的感知与其他团队进行比较。