Chaiyasit Noppadol, Romero Roberto, Chaemsaithong Piya, Docheva Nikolina, Bhatti Gaurav, Kusanovic Juan Pedro, Dong Zhong, Yeo Lami, Pacora Percy, Hassan Sonia S, Erez Offer
.
J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26;45(5):539-550. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0344.
Clinical chorioamnionitis is the most common infection/inflammatory process diagnosed in labor and delivery units worldwide. The condition is a syndrome that can be caused by (1) intra-amniotic infection, (2) intra-amniotic inflammation without demonstrable microorganisms (i.e. sterile intra-amniotic inflammation), and (3) maternal systemic inflammation that is not associated with intra-amniotic inflammation. The presence of intra-amniotic inflammation is a risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in a broad range of obstetrical syndromes that includes clinical chorioamnionitis at term. Although the diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection has relied on culture results, such information is not immediately available for patient management. Therefore, the diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation could be helpful as a proxy for intra-amniotic infection, while results of microbiologic studies are pending. A rapid test is now available for the diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation, based on the determination of neutrophil collagenase or matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8). The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the diagnostic indices of a rapid MMP-8 test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection in patients with the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis at term, and (2) to compare the diagnostic performance of a rapid MMP-8 test to that of a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) interleukin (IL)-6 test for patients with clinical chorioamnionitis at term.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted. A transabdominal amniocentesis was performed in patients with clinical chorioamnionitis at term (n=44). Amniotic fluid was analyzed using cultivation techniques (for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria as well as genital Mycoplasmas) and broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS). Amniotic fluid IL-6 concentrations were determined by ELISA, and rapid MMP-8 results were determined by Yoon's MMP-8 Check®. Intra-amniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration ≥2.6 ng/mL, and intra-amniotic infection was diagnosed by the presence of microorganisms in the amniotic fluid accompanied by intra-amniotic inflammation. The diagnostic indices of Yoon's MMP-8 Check® for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation were calculated. In order to objectively compare Yoon's MMP-8 Check® with the ELISA IL-6 test for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation, we used an amniotic fluid white blood cell (WBC) count ≥50 cells/mm3 to define intra-amniotic inflammation.
(1) A positive rapid MMP-8 test had a sensitivity of 82.4% (28/34), specificity of 90% (9/10), positive predictive value of 96.6% (28/29), negative predictive value of 60% (9/15), positive likelihood ratio 8.2 (95% CI 1.3-53.2), and negative likelihood ratio 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.4) for the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation (prevalence 77.3%); (2) a positive rapid MMP-8 test had a sensitivity of 91.7% (22/24), specificity of 65% (13/20), positive predictive value of 75.9% (22/29), negative predictive value of 86.7% (13/15), positive likelihood ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 1.4-4.8), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 (95% CI 0.03-0.5) for the identification of intra-amniotic infection; (3) the rapid MMP-8 test had a significantly higher specificity than the ELISA IL-6 test in the identification of intra-amniotic inflammation as determined by an amniotic fluid WBC count ≥50 cells/mm3. The sensitivity and accuracy of the rapid MMP-8 test were comparable to those of the ELISA IL-6 test; and (4) importantly, the rapid MMP-8 test had 100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value in the identification of neonates affected with fetal inflammatory response syndrome (FIRS).
The rapid diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation is possible by analysis of amniotic fluid using a point-of-care test for MMP-8. Patients with a positive test are at risk of delivering a neonate affected with systemic inflammation, a risk factor for adverse neonatal outcome.
临床绒毛膜羊膜炎是全球分娩单位诊断出的最常见的感染/炎症过程。该病症是一种综合征,可能由以下原因引起:(1)羊膜腔内感染;(2)无明显微生物的羊膜腔内炎症(即无菌性羊膜腔内炎症);(3)与羊膜腔内炎症无关的母体全身炎症。羊膜腔内炎症的存在是包括足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎在内的多种产科综合征中不良母婴结局的危险因素。尽管羊膜腔内感染的诊断依赖于培养结果,但此类信息无法立即用于患者管理。因此,在微生物学研究结果待定期间,羊膜腔内炎症的诊断作为羊膜腔内感染的替代指标可能会有所帮助。现在有一种基于中性粒细胞胶原酶或基质金属蛋白酶-8(MMP-8)测定的快速检测方法可用于诊断羊膜腔内炎症。本研究的目的是:(1)评估快速MMP-8检测对足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎患者羊膜腔内炎症/感染的诊断指标;(2)比较快速MMP-8检测与传统酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)白细胞介素(IL)-6检测对足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎患者的诊断性能。
进行了一项回顾性队列研究。对足月临床绒毛膜羊膜炎患者(n = 44)进行经腹羊膜腔穿刺。使用培养技术(用于需氧菌、厌氧菌以及生殖道支原体)和广谱聚合酶链反应(PCR)结合电喷雾电离质谱(PCR/ESI-MS)分析羊水。通过ELISA测定羊水IL-6浓度,通过Yoon's MMP-8 Check®测定快速MMP-8结果。羊膜腔内炎症定义为羊水IL-6浓度≥2.6 ng/mL升高,羊膜腔内感染通过羊水中存在微生物并伴有羊膜腔内炎症来诊断。计算Yoon's MMP-8 Check®对羊膜腔内炎症的诊断指标。为了客观比较Yoon's MMP-8 Check®与ELISA IL-6检测对羊膜腔内炎症的诊断效果,我们使用羊水白细胞(WBC)计数≥50个细胞/mm³来定义羊膜腔内炎症。
(1)快速MMP-8检测呈阳性时,对羊膜腔内炎症的识别灵敏度为82.4%(28/34),特异性为90%(9/10),阳性预测值为96.6%(28/29),阴性预测值为60%(9/15),阳性似然比为8.2(95% CI 1.3 - 53.2),阴性似然比为0.2(95% CI 0.1 - 0.4)(患病率77.3%);(2)快速MMP-8检测呈阳性时,对羊膜腔内感染的识别灵敏度为91.7%(22/24),特异性为65%(13/20),阳性预测值为75.9%(22/29),阴性预测值为86.7%(13/15),阳性似然比为2.6(95% CI 1.4 - 4.8),阴性似然比为0.1(95% CI 0.03 - 0.5);(3)在通过羊水WBC计数≥50个细胞/mm³确定的羊膜腔内炎症识别中,快速MMP-8检测的特异性显著高于ELISA IL-6检测。快速MMP-8检测的灵敏度和准确性与ELISA IL-6检测相当;(4)重要的是,快速MMP-8检测在识别受胎儿炎症反应综合征(FIRS)影响的新生儿时具有100%的灵敏度和100%的阴性预测值。
通过使用针对MMP-8的即时检测分析羊水,可以快速诊断羊膜腔内炎症。检测呈阳性的患者有分娩受全身炎症影响的新生儿的风险,这是不良新生儿结局的一个危险因素。