• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于估算辐射陆地表面温度的小型无人机(sUAS)微测辐射热计温度图像的替代校准

Vicarious Calibration of sUAS Microbolometer Temperature Imagery for Estimation of Radiometric Land Surface Temperature.

作者信息

Torres-Rua Alfonso

机构信息

Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 26;17(7):1499. doi: 10.3390/s17071499.

DOI:10.3390/s17071499
PMID:28672864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5539465/
Abstract

In recent years, the availability of lightweight microbolometer thermal cameras compatible with small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) has allowed their use in diverse scientific and management activities that require sub-meter pixel resolution. Nevertheless, as with sensors already used in temperature remote sensing (e.g., Landsat satellites), a radiance atmospheric correction is necessary to estimate land surface temperature. This is because atmospheric conditions at any sUAS flight elevation will have an adverse impact on the image accuracy, derived calculations, and study replicability using the microbolometer technology. This study presents a vicarious calibration methodology (sUAS-specific, time-specific, flight-specific, and sensor-specific) for sUAS temperature imagery traceable back to NIST-standards and current atmospheric correction methods. For this methodology, a three-year data collection campaign with a sUAS called "AggieAir", developed at Utah State University, was performed for vineyards near Lodi, California, for flights conducted at different times (early morning, Landsat overpass, and mid-afternoon") and seasonal conditions. From the results of this study, it was found that, despite the spectral response of microbolometer cameras (7.0 to 14.0 μm), it was possible to account for the effects of atmospheric and sUAS operational conditions, regardless of time and weather, to acquire accurate surface temperature data. In addition, it was found that the main atmospheric correction parameters (transmissivity and atmospheric radiance) significantly varied over the course of a day. These parameters fluctuated the most in early morning and partially stabilized in Landsat overpass and in mid-afternoon times. In terms of accuracy, estimated atmospheric correction parameters presented adequate statistics (confidence bounds under ±0.1 for transmissivity and ±1.2 W/m²/sr/um for atmospheric radiance, with a range of RMSE below 1.0 W/m²/sr/um) for all sUAS flights. Differences in estimated temperatures between original thermal image and the vicarious calibration procedure reported here were estimated from -5 °C to 10 °C for early morning, and from 0 to 20 °C for Landsat overpass and mid-afternoon times.

摘要

近年来,与小型无人机系统(sUAS)兼容的轻型微测辐射热计热成像仪的出现,使得它们能够用于各种需要亚米级像素分辨率的科学和管理活动。然而,与已经用于温度遥感的传感器(如陆地卫星)一样,为了估算陆地表面温度,需要进行辐射大气校正。这是因为在任何sUAS飞行高度的大气条件都会对使用微测辐射热计技术的图像精度、衍生计算和研究可重复性产生不利影响。本研究提出了一种可追溯到美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)标准和当前大气校正方法的sUAS温度图像替代校准方法(特定于sUAS、特定于时间、特定于飞行和特定于传感器)。对于这种方法,在加利福尼亚州洛迪附近的葡萄园进行了一项为期三年的数据收集活动,使用犹他州立大学开发的名为“AggieAir”的sUAS,在不同时间(清晨、陆地卫星过境和下午中段)和季节条件下进行飞行。从这项研究的结果发现,尽管微测辐射热计相机的光谱响应为7.0至14.0μm,但无论时间和天气如何,都有可能考虑大气和sUAS运行条件的影响,以获取准确的地表温度数据。此外,还发现主要的大气校正参数(透过率和大气辐射率)在一天中显著变化。这些参数在清晨波动最大,在陆地卫星过境和下午中段部分稳定。在精度方面,估计的大气校正参数对于所有sUAS飞行都呈现出足够的统计数据(透过率的置信区间在±0.1以内,大气辐射率的置信区间在±1.2W/m²/sr/μm以内,均方根误差(RMSE)范围低于1.0W/m²/sr/μm)。此处报告的原始热图像与替代校准程序之间估计温度的差异,清晨为-5°C至10°C,陆地卫星过境和下午中段为0至20°C。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/b25e23879130/sensors-17-01499-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/d404ef7920e9/sensors-17-01499-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/ea94e14dc9f5/sensors-17-01499-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/3e009d02ec9c/sensors-17-01499-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/e2ff1e8b1480/sensors-17-01499-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/28fb0fa1a57b/sensors-17-01499-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/c7e935c64ab1/sensors-17-01499-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/734bd2d90318/sensors-17-01499-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/d57a0248618f/sensors-17-01499-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/d0771449128d/sensors-17-01499-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/b25e23879130/sensors-17-01499-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/d404ef7920e9/sensors-17-01499-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/ea94e14dc9f5/sensors-17-01499-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/3e009d02ec9c/sensors-17-01499-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/e2ff1e8b1480/sensors-17-01499-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/28fb0fa1a57b/sensors-17-01499-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/c7e935c64ab1/sensors-17-01499-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/734bd2d90318/sensors-17-01499-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/d57a0248618f/sensors-17-01499-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/d0771449128d/sensors-17-01499-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ac/5539465/b25e23879130/sensors-17-01499-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Vicarious Calibration of sUAS Microbolometer Temperature Imagery for Estimation of Radiometric Land Surface Temperature.用于估算辐射陆地表面温度的小型无人机(sUAS)微测辐射热计温度图像的替代校准
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jun 26;17(7):1499. doi: 10.3390/s17071499.
2
Influence of Model Grid Size on the Estimation of Surface Fluxes Using the Two Source Energy Balance Model and sUAS Imagery in Vineyards.模型网格大小对葡萄园使用双源能量平衡模型和小型无人机影像估算地表通量的影响
Remote Sens (Basel). 2020;12(3):342. doi: 10.3390/rs12030342.
3
Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Energy Fluxes using a Deep-Learning based High-Resolution Emissivity Model and the Two-Source Energy Balance Model with sUAS information.使用基于深度学习的高分辨率发射率模型和带有小型无人机系统(sUAS)信息的双源能量平衡模型估算蒸散量和能量通量。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Jun 2;11414. doi: 10.1117/12.2558824. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Assessing Daily Evapotranspiration Methodologies from One-Time-of-Day sUAS and EC Information in the Project.在该项目中,根据单日小型无人机系统(sUAS)和涡度相关法(EC)信息评估日蒸散量方法。
Remote Sens (Basel). 2021 Aug 1;13(15):2887. doi: 10.3390/rs13152887. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Estimation of surface thermal emissivity in a vineyard for UAV microbolometer thermal cameras using NASA HyTES hyperspectral thermal, Landsat and AggieAir optical data.利用美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的高光谱热发射光谱仪(HyTES)热数据、陆地卫星数据和阿吉航空(AggieAir)光学数据估算无人机微测辐射热计热成像仪在葡萄园中的表面热发射率。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2019;11008. doi: 10.1117/12.2518958. Epub 2019 May 14.
6
Intercomparison of Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) Measurements for Atmospheric Science during the LAPSE-RATE Campaign.低空探空率(LAPSE-RATE)实验期间小型无人机系统(sUAS)大气科学测量的相互比较
Sensors (Basel). 2019 May 10;19(9):2179. doi: 10.3390/s19092179.
7
Multispectral Sensor Calibration and Characterization for sUAS Remote Sensing.多光谱传感器的校准与特性描述用于小型无人机系统遥感。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Oct 14;19(20):4453. doi: 10.3390/s19204453.
8
Challenges to quantitative applications of Landsat observations for the urban thermal environment.陆地卫星观测在城市热环境定量应用方面面临的挑战。
J Environ Sci (China). 2017 Sep;59:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Implications of Soil and Canopy Temperature Uncertainty in the Estimation of Surface Energy Fluxes Using TSEB2T and High-resolution Imagery in Commercial Vineyards.利用TSEB2T和高分辨率影像估算商业葡萄园地表能量通量时土壤和冠层温度不确定性的影响
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Apr-May;11414. doi: 10.1117/12.2558715. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
Estimation of Land Surface Temperature in an Agricultural Region of Bangladesh from Landsat 8: Intercomparison of Four Algorithms.利用 Landsat 8 估算孟加拉国农业区的地表温度:四种算法的比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 23;20(6):1778. doi: 10.3390/s20061778.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrathin Ge-YF antireflective coating with 0.5 % reflectivity on high-index substrate for long-wavelength infrared cameras.用于长波红外相机的在高折射率衬底上具有0.5%反射率的超薄锗钇抗反射涂层。
Nanophotonics. 2024 Aug 27;13(21):4067-4078. doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0360. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Assessing Daily Evapotranspiration Methodologies from One-Time-of-Day sUAS and EC Information in the Project.在该项目中,根据单日小型无人机系统(sUAS)和涡度相关法(EC)信息评估日蒸散量方法。
Remote Sens (Basel). 2021 Aug 1;13(15):2887. doi: 10.3390/rs13152887. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
3
Detecting Plant Stress Using Thermal and Optical Imagery From an Unoccupied Aerial Vehicle.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiative transfer codes for atmospheric correction and aerosol retrieval: intercomparison study.用于大气校正和气溶胶反演的辐射传输代码:相互比较研究
Appl Opt. 2008 May 1;47(13):2215-26. doi: 10.1364/ao.47.002215.
2
Real-time imaging using a 2.8 THz quantum cascade laser and uncooled infrared microbolometer camera.使用2.8太赫兹量子级联激光器和非制冷红外微测辐射热计相机进行实时成像。
Opt Lett. 2008 Mar 1;33(5):440-2. doi: 10.1364/ol.33.000440.
3
Validation of a vector version of the 6S radiative transfer code for atmospheric correction of satellite data. Part II. Homogeneous Lambertian and anisotropic surfaces.
利用无人机的热成像和光学成像检测植物胁迫
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 27;12:734944. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.734944. eCollection 2021.
4
Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Energy Fluxes using a Deep-Learning based High-Resolution Emissivity Model and the Two-Source Energy Balance Model with sUAS information.使用基于深度学习的高分辨率发射率模型和带有小型无人机系统(sUAS)信息的双源能量平衡模型估算蒸散量和能量通量。
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Jun 2;11414. doi: 10.1117/12.2558824. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
To What Extend Does the Eddy Covariance Footprint Cutoff Influence the Estimation of Surface Energy Fluxes Using Two Source Energy Balance Model and High-Resolution Imagery in Commercial Vineyards?涡度协方差足迹截止对利用双源能量平衡模型和高分辨率影像估算商业葡萄园地表能量通量有何影响?
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Apr-May;11414. doi: 10.1117/12.2558777. Epub 2020 May 26.
6
Implications of Soil and Canopy Temperature Uncertainty in the Estimation of Surface Energy Fluxes Using TSEB2T and High-resolution Imagery in Commercial Vineyards.利用TSEB2T和高分辨率影像估算商业葡萄园地表能量通量时土壤和冠层温度不确定性的影响
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Apr-May;11414. doi: 10.1117/12.2558715. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Field-Based Calibration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Thermal Infrared Imagery with Temperature-Controlled References.基于现场的与控温参考物的无人机热红外图像的校准。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 11;20(24):7098. doi: 10.3390/s20247098.
8
Evapotranspiration Estimation with Small UAVs in Precision Agriculture.精准农业中小型无人机蒸散量估算。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;20(22):6427. doi: 10.3390/s20226427.
9
Intercomparison of In Situ Sensors for Ground-Based Land Surface Temperature Measurements.用于地面陆地表面温度测量的原位传感器的相互比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 15;20(18):5268. doi: 10.3390/s20185268.
10
A Calibration Procedure for Field and UAV-Based Uncooled Thermal Infrared Instruments.一种用于基于地面和无人机的非制冷热红外仪器的校准程序。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 10;20(11):3316. doi: 10.3390/s20113316.
用于卫星数据大气校正的6S辐射传输代码矢量版本的验证。第二部分。均匀朗伯面和各向异性表面。
Appl Opt. 2007 Jul 10;46(20):4455-64. doi: 10.1364/ao.46.004455.
4
Validation of a vector version of the 6S radiative transfer code for atmospheric correction of satellite data. Part I: path radiance.用于卫星数据大气校正的 6S 辐射传输代码矢量版本的验证。第一部分:路径辐射率。
Appl Opt. 2006 Sep 10;45(26):6762-74. doi: 10.1364/ao.45.006762.
5
Hyperspectral integrated computational imaging.高光谱集成计算成像
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005 Jun;382(4):868-72. doi: 10.1007/s00216-004-2979-1.