Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合应用于短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度卒中的已发表随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials of combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in transient ischemic attack or minor stroke.

作者信息

Zhou Xingjian, Tian Jing, Zhu Ming Zhen, He Colin K

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei 441000, P.R. China.

Orient Health Care, StegoTech LLC, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USA.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2017 Jul;14(1):324-332. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4459. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

The use of antiplatelet agents in patients with ischemic stroke is recommended. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of the treatment of clopidogrel plus aspirin (ASA) and that of ASA alone in patients with mild stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies of Clop + ASA vs. ASA therapy in the patients with minor stroke/TIA were identified by electronic bibliographic searches. The primary result was recurrent stroke, while myocardial infarction (MI) as well as vascular mortalities were the secondary result, and major hemorrhagic events were the safety result. A comparative analysis of binary outcomes was performed on the treatment groups, with the employment of fixed effect models and the measurement of risk ratios (95% CI). Five RCT studies involving 9,527 patients were included. Compared with the group with ASA treatment, there was significant reduction in the incidence of recurrent stroke in the group with Clop + ASA (RR=0.76, 95% CI=0.67-0.87, P<0.0001), and there was no significant increase in the incidence of vascular mortalities and MI (RR=1.08, 95% CI=0.83-1.41, P=0.56) and no significant change in major hemorrhagic events (RR=1.55, 95% CI=0.72-3.36, P=0.26). Therefore, the treatment with Clop + ASA seems safe as well as effective for decreasing stroke recurrence. In addition, this is related to a statistically insignificant trend in increasing vascular mortalities, MI, and primary hemorrhagic events. These findings need to be confirmed in prospective studies.

摘要

推荐对缺血性中风患者使用抗血小板药物。在本研究中,我们比较了氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林(ASA)与单用ASA治疗轻度中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者的疗效和安全性。通过电子文献检索确定了关于氯吡格雷联合ASA与ASA治疗轻度中风/TIA患者的随机对照试验(RCT)研究。主要结果是复发性中风,心肌梗死(MI)以及血管性死亡为次要结果,严重出血事件为安全性结果。对各治疗组的二元结局进行比较分析,采用固定效应模型并测量风险比(95%CI)。纳入了5项涉及9527例患者的RCT研究。与ASA治疗组相比,氯吡格雷联合ASA组复发性中风的发生率显著降低(RR=0.76,95%CI=0.67-0.87,P<0.0001),血管性死亡和MI的发生率没有显著增加(RR=1.08,95%CI=0.83-1.41,P=0.56),严重出血事件也没有显著变化(RR=1.55,95%CI=0.72-3.36,P=0.26)。因此,氯吡格雷联合ASA治疗似乎对降低中风复发既安全又有效。此外,这与血管性死亡、MI和原发性出血事件增加的统计学无显著意义趋势有关。这些发现需要在前瞻性研究中得到证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba38/5488532/6ab30083b117/etm-14-01-0324-g00.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验