Suppr超能文献

基于对侧随意收缩和受刺激收缩的训练方案对肌肉力量和对侧肢体单足姿势控制的影响。

Effects of training programs based on ipsilateral voluntary and stimulated contractions on muscle strength and monopedal postural control of the contralateral limb.

机构信息

Laboratoire Etudes Sociales et Humaines et Analyse des Activités Physiques et Sportives, Département EPS, Université Badji Mokhtar Annaba, BP 12, 23000, Annaba, Algeria.

Laboratoire Mouvement, Equilibre, Performance et Santé (EA 4445), Département STAPS, ZA Bastillac Sud, Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, 11 rue Morane Saulnier, 65000, Tarbes, France.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Sep;117(9):1799-1806. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3676-z. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of unilateral strength training by stimulated and voluntary contractions on muscle strength and monopedal postural control of the contralateral limb.

METHODS

36 non-active healthy male subjects were recruited and split randomly into three groups. Two groups of 12 subjects took part in a strength-training program (3 sessions a week over 8 weeks) comprising 43 contractions of the quadriceps femoris of the ipsilateral limb (at 20% of the MVC). One group carried out voluntary contractions exclusively (VOL group), while the other group benefited exclusively from electro-induced contractions (NMES group). The other 12 subjects formed the control (CON) group. Assessments of MVC and monopedal postural control in static and dynamic postural tasks were performed with the ipsilateral (ISPI) and contralateral (CONTRA) limbs before (PRE) and after (POST) completion of the training program.

RESULTS

After the training program, the MVC of the IPSI and CONTRA limbs increased similarly for both experimental groups (VOL and NMES). There were no significant improvements of monopedal postural control for the IPSI or CONTRA limbs in either the VOL or NMES experimental group. No change was observed for the CON group over the protocol period.

CONCLUSION

The purposed training program with NMES vs VOL contractions induced strength gains but did not permit any improvement of contralateral monopedal postural control in healthy young subjects. This has potential for therapeutic application and allows clinicians to focus their training programs on dynamic and poly-articular exercises to improve the postural control in young subjects.

摘要

目的

比较单侧力量训练通过刺激和自主收缩对肌肉力量和对侧肢体单足姿势控制的影响。

方法

招募了 36 名非活跃的健康男性受试者,并随机分为三组。两组共 12 名受试者参加了一项力量训练计划(每周 3 次,共 8 周),包括 43 次同侧股四头肌收缩(占 MVC 的 20%)。一组仅进行自主收缩(VOL 组),而另一组仅受益于电诱导收缩(NMES 组)。其余 12 名受试者组成对照组(CON 组)。在完成训练计划前后(PRE 和 POST),使用同侧(ISPI)和对侧(CONTRA)肢体评估 MVC 和单足姿势控制在静态和动态姿势任务中的表现。

结果

在训练计划后,两个实验组(VOL 和 NMES)的 ISPI 和 CONTRA 肢体的 MVC 均有相似的增加。在 VOL 或 NMES 实验组中,对侧单足姿势控制均未出现显著改善。CON 组在整个方案期间没有变化。

结论

与 VOL 收缩相比,NMES 引起的训练计划可导致力量增加,但不能改善健康年轻受试者的对侧单足姿势控制。这对于治疗应用具有潜力,并允许临床医生将他们的训练计划集中在动态和多关节练习上,以提高年轻受试者的姿势控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验