Peng Kevin A, Kuan Edward C, Hagan Suzannah, Wilkinson Eric P, Miller Mia E
1 House Clinic, Los Angeles, California, USA.
2 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep;157(3):392-400. doi: 10.1177/0194599817718798. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
Objective To identify factors predicting performance outcomes following cochlear implantation in patients with cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia. Data Sources Individual patient data extracted from published case series and reports. Review Methods The MEDLINE database, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were queried for "cochlear implant" in conjunction with "aplasia" or "hypoplasia" between 1985 and 2015. Eighteen studies were included describing 97 subjects with individual postimplant auditory data. Postimplant performance was categorized as follows: level 1, nonstimulation/minimal detection; level 2, improved detection; level 3, closed-set speech perception; or level 4, open-set speech perception. The subjects achieving speech perception (levels 3 and 4) were descriptively compared with those who did not. Results Subjects with a hypoplastic cochlear nerve on magnetic resonance imaging had higher reported rates of achieving speech perception than those with an aplastic nerve. Subjects with syndromic medical comorbidities had higher reported rates of nonstimulation than nonsyndromic subjects. The data showed that some children with an aplastic cochlear nerve or those with partial electrode insertion could obtain levels of speech discrimination. Reporting of patient characteristics and auditory outcomes was extremely variable across studies. Conclusion As previously shown, cochlear implant in patients with cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia can provide meaningful hearing for select patients. The current study suggests that presence of a cochlear nerve on magnetic resonance imaging and lack of comorbid medical syndrome are associated with better auditory outcomes in such patients. Future efforts to report individual data in a consistent manner may allow better determination of predictive factors.
目的 确定预测人工耳蜗植入术在耳蜗神经发育不全或发育不良患者中的性能结果的因素。
数据来源 从已发表的病例系列和报告中提取的个体患者数据。
综述方法 检索MEDLINE数据库、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Web of Science和谷歌学术,查找1985年至2015年间与“人工耳蜗植入”以及“发育不全”或“发育不良”相关的文献。纳入18项研究,描述了97名有植入后听觉数据的受试者。植入后的性能分为以下几类:1级,无刺激/最小检测;2级,检测改善;3级,封闭式言语感知;或4级,开放式言语感知。对实现言语感知(3级和4级)的受试者与未实现言语感知的受试者进行描述性比较。
结果 磁共振成像显示耳蜗神经发育不良的受试者实现言语感知的报告率高于耳蜗神经发育不全的受试者。患有综合征性合并症的受试者无刺激的报告率高于非综合征性受试者。数据显示,一些耳蜗神经发育不全的儿童或部分电极植入的儿童可以获得言语辨别水平。不同研究中患者特征和听觉结果的报告差异极大。
结论 如先前所示,人工耳蜗植入术在耳蜗神经发育不全或发育不良患者中可为部分患者提供有意义的听力。当前研究表明,磁共振成像显示存在耳蜗神经以及缺乏合并症医学综合征与这类患者更好的听觉结果相关。未来以一致方式报告个体数据的努力可能有助于更好地确定预测因素。