Jünger Elisabeth, Javadi Amir-Homayoun, Wiers Corinde E, Sommer Christian, Garbusow Maria, Bernhardt Nadine, Kuitunen-Paul Sören, Smolka Michael N, Zimmermann Ulrich S
1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
2 School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jul;31(7):893-905. doi: 10.1177/0269881117691454. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
Alcohol-related cues can evoke explicit and implicit motivation to drink alcohol. Concerning the links between explicit and implicit motivation, there are mixed findings. Therefore, we investigated both concepts in 51 healthy 18- to 19-year-old males, who are less affected by neuropsychological deficits in decision-making that are attributed to previous alcohol exposure than older participants. In a randomized crossover design, adolescents were infused with either alcohol or placebo. Self-ratings of alcohol desire, thirst, well-being and alcohol effects comprised our explicit measures of motivation. To measure implicit motivation, we used money and drink stimuli in a Pavlovian conditioning (Pc) task and an Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). Alcohol administration increased explicit motivation to drink alcohol, reduced Pc choices of alcoholic drink-conditioned stimuli, but had no effect on the AAT. This combination of results might be explained by differences between goal-directed and habitual behavior or a temporary reduction in rewarding outcome expectancies. Further, there was no association between our measures of motivation to drink alcohol, indicating that both self-reported motivation to drink and implicit approach tendencies may independently contribute to adolescents' actual alcohol intake. Correlations between Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores and our measures of motivation to drink alcohol suggest that interventions should target high-risk adolescents after alcohol intake. Clinical trials: Project 4: Acute Effects of Alcohol on Learning and Habitization in Healthy Young Adults (LeAD_P4); NCT01858818; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01858818.
与酒精相关的线索能够引发饮酒的显性动机和隐性动机。关于显性动机和隐性动机之间的联系,研究结果不一。因此,我们对51名年龄在18至19岁的健康男性进行了这两种概念的调查,相较于年龄较大的参与者,他们较少受到因先前饮酒而导致的决策方面神经心理缺陷的影响。在随机交叉设计中,青少年被输注酒精或安慰剂。对饮酒欲望、口渴感、幸福感和酒精效应的自我评分构成了我们对动机的显性测量。为了测量隐性动机,我们在经典条件反射(Pc)任务和趋近-回避任务(AAT)中使用了金钱和饮料刺激。给予酒精增加了饮酒的显性动机,减少了对酒精饮料条件刺激的Pc选择,但对AAT没有影响。这种结果组合可能由目标导向行为和习惯性行为之间的差异或奖励结果预期的暂时降低来解释。此外,表示饮酒动机的测量之间没有关联,这表明自我报告的饮酒动机和隐性趋近倾向可能独立地影响青少年的实际酒精摄入量。酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)分数与我们的饮酒动机测量之间的相关性表明,干预措施应在青少年饮酒后针对高风险个体。临床试验:项目4:酒精对健康年轻成年人学习和习惯化的急性影响(LeAD_P4);NCT01858818;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01858818 。