Institute for Mental Health and Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Addiction. 2021 Jul;116(7):1716-1724. doi: 10.1111/add.15368. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
Research shows that sensitivity to certain alcohol responses conveys risk for problem drinking. This study aimed to determine if high-risk adolescent drinkers infuse more alcohol and experience greater alcohol-induced stimulation and wanting and less sedation than low-risk adolescent drinkers.
Ninety-two low- (n = 38) and high-risk (n = 54) adolescent drinkers, as determined by Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores of < 6 or ≥ 6, respectively, participated in the Dresden Longitudinal Study on Alcohol Use in Young Adults in which intravenous alcohol self-administration was examined in a mixed within- and between-subjects design.
Technische Universität Dresden. Dresden, Germany.
Predictors were drinking status (high- versus low-risk), time and their interactions. Outcomes were arterial blood alcohol concentration (aBAC); alcohol-induced stimulation, sedation and wanting assessed at baseline, 10 (alcohol prime), 45, 65, 85, 105, 125 and 145 minutes. Covariates were family history of alcohol use disorder, sex and aBAC.
The alcohol prime dose produced similar sharp increases in stimulation and sedation in high- and low-risk drinkers (time P < 0.001; group × time P > 0.05). During self-administration, high-risk drinkers reached higher aBACs (P = 0.028) at a faster rate (group × time P < 0.001), and experienced further increases in stimulation (group × time P = 0.005) but with similar sedation (group × time P = 0.794) than in low-risk drinkers. High-risk drinkers also exhibited greater tonic alcohol wanting (group P = 0.003) throughout the session.
High-risk adolescent drinkers appear to have heightened sensitivity to alcohol-induced stimulation and tonic high levels of wanting compared with low-risk adolescent drinkers.
研究表明,对某些酒精反应的敏感性与问题饮酒的风险相关。本研究旨在确定高危青少年饮酒者与低危青少年饮酒者相比,是否会摄入更多的酒精,经历更大的酒精诱导刺激、渴望和更少的镇静。
92 名低危(n=38)和高危(n=54)青少年饮酒者,分别根据酒精使用障碍识别测试(Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test)得分<6 或≥6 确定,参加了德累斯顿纵向研究青少年成人饮酒情况,该研究采用混合在组内和组间设计,检查了静脉内酒精自我给药情况。
德国德累斯顿工业大学。
预测因素为饮酒状态(高危与低危)、时间及其交互作用。结果为动脉血酒精浓度(aBAC);基线、10 分钟(酒精激发)、45 分钟、65 分钟、85 分钟、105 分钟、125 分钟和 145 分钟时评估的酒精诱导刺激、镇静和渴望。协变量为酒精使用障碍家族史、性别和 aBAC。
酒精激发剂量在高危和低危饮酒者中产生了相似的刺激和镇静急剧增加(时间 P < 0.001;组×时间 P > 0.05)。在自我给药期间,高危饮酒者达到更高的 aBAC(P=0.028)更快的速度(组×时间 P < 0.001),并经历了进一步的刺激增加(组×时间 P=0.005),但镇静程度相似(组×时间 P=0.794)比低危饮酒者。高危饮酒者在整个实验过程中也表现出更强的酒精渴望(组 P=0.003)。
与低危青少年饮酒者相比,高危青少年饮酒者似乎对酒精诱导的刺激和持续高水平的渴望更为敏感。