Suppr超能文献

Navien导管在神经血管内介入治疗中的应用经验。

Navien catheter experience in neuroendovascular interventions.

作者信息

Jindal Gaurav, Giacon Luciano, Iyoha Moronke, Miller Timothy, Aldrich Francois, Simard Marc, Shivashankar Ravishankar, Gandhi Dheeraj

机构信息

1 Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA.

2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Oct;23(5):551-555. doi: 10.1177/1591019917717575. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

Abstract

Purpose Advancements in catheter technology have allowed for greater flexibility and trackability. We report 265 consecutive, single-center neurointerventional cases using the Navien guide catheter. Materials and methods Retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive intracranial endovascular procedures utilizing the Navien catheter. Data collected included procedure type, catheters, guide catheter position, cervical access artery tortuosity grade and complications. Results The 5 French catheter was used in 130 cases. The 6 French catheter was used in 135 cases. Access was via the internal carotid artery in 204, external carotid artery in 10, and vertebral artery in 51 cases. Catheter tip position was in the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery in 36.6% (97/265), distal cervical internal carotid artery in 13.9% (37/265), cavernous internal carotid artery in 10.2% (27/265), proximal or mid cervical internal carotid artery in 5.6% (15/265), supraclinoid internal carotid artery in 0.8% (2/265), and intradural vertebral artery in 0.8% (2/265) of cases. Catheter position was not determined in 18.9% (50/265) of cases. Proximal vessel tortuosity (grade B or C) was present in 98 cases (37%), and the catheter was tracked distal to the tortuosity in 93% (91/98) of these cases. The overall success rate without catheter complication was 97% (258/265). The Navien was replaced by another catheter in 1.9% (5/265) of cases. There was one cervical artery dissection (0.4%) and one severe vasospasm (0.4%) necessitating Navien removal. Conclusions The Navien guide catheter provided distal access support for neuroendovascular interventions in nearly all cases, including cases with proximal artery tortuosity, with a low rate of catheter-related complications.

摘要

目的 导管技术的进步使得导管具有更大的灵活性和可追踪性。我们报告了连续265例使用Navien引导导管的单中心神经介入病例。材料与方法 对使用Navien导管的连续颅内血管内手术进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括手术类型、导管、引导导管位置、颈部入路动脉迂曲程度和并发症。结果 130例使用5F导管,135例使用6F导管。204例经颈内动脉入路,10例经颈外动脉入路,51例经椎动脉入路。导管尖端位置位于颈内动脉岩段的占36.6%(97/265),颈内动脉远端颈部段的占13.9%(37/265),海绵窦段颈内动脉的占10.2%(27/265),颈内动脉近端或中段颈部段的占5.6%(15/265),颈内动脉床突上段的占0.8%(2/265),硬脊膜内椎动脉的占0.8%(2/265)。18.9%(50/265)的病例未确定导管位置。98例(37%)存在近端血管迂曲(B级或C级),其中93%(91/98)的病例导管追踪至迂曲远端。无导管并发症的总体成功率为97%(258/265)。1.9%(5/265)的病例中Navien被另一根导管替代。有1例颈内动脉夹层(0.4%)和1例严重血管痉挛(0.4%)需要移除Navien。结论 Navien引导导管在几乎所有病例中都为神经血管内介入提供了远端入路支持,包括近端动脉迂曲的病例,且导管相关并发症发生率较低。

相似文献

1
Navien catheter experience in neuroendovascular interventions.Navien导管在神经血管内介入治疗中的应用经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2017 Oct;23(5):551-555. doi: 10.1177/1591019917717575. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
6
The Benefits of Navien™ Intracranial Support Catheter for Endovascular Treatment.Navien™颅内支撑导管用于血管内治疗的益处
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;18(3):234-238. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2016.18.3.234. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Benefits of Navien™ Intracranial Support Catheter for Endovascular Treatment.Navien™颅内支撑导管用于血管内治疗的益处
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;18(3):234-238. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2016.18.3.234. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
10
The versatile distal access catheter: the Cleveland Clinic experience.万能远端入路导管:克利夫兰诊所经验。
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jun;68(6):1677-86; discussion 1686. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820edfd8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验