• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的视野可靠性评估标准。

Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.

作者信息

Yohannan Jithin, Wang Jiangxia, Brown Jamie, Chauhan Balwantray C, Boland Michael V, Friedman David S, Ramulu Pradeep Y

机构信息

Glaucoma Center of Excellence, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1612-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.035. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.035
PMID:28676280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5675138/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Assess the impact of false-positives (FP), false-negatives (FN), fixation losses (FL), and test duration (TD) on visual field (VF) reliability at different stages of glaucoma severity.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 10 262 VFs from 1538 eyes of 909 subjects with suspect or manifest glaucoma and ≥5 VF examinations.

METHODS

Predicted mean deviation (MD) was calculated with multilevel modeling of longitudinal data. Differences between predicted and observed MD (ΔMD) were calculated as a reliability measure. The impact of FP, FN, FL, and TD on ΔMD was assessed using multilevel modeling.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

ΔMD associated with a 10% increment in FP, FN, and FL, or a 1-minute increase in TD.

RESULTS

FL had little impact on ΔMD (<0.2 decibels [dB] per 10% abnormal catch trials), and no level of FL produced ≥1 dB of ΔMD at any disease stage. FP yielded greater than expected MD, with a 10% increment in abnormal catch trials associated with a ΔMD = 0.42, 0.73, and 0.66 dB in mild (MD >-6 dB), moderate (-6 ≤MD <-12 dB), and severe (-12 ≤MD ≤-20 dB) disease, respectively, up to 20% abnormal catch trials, and a ΔMD = 1.57, 2.06, and 3.53 dB beyond 20% abnormal catch trials. FNs generally produced observed MDs below expected MDs. FN were minimally impactful up to 20% abnormal catch trials (ΔMD per 10% increment >-0.14 dB at all levels of severity). Beyond 20% abnormal catch trials, each 10% increment in abnormal catch trials was associated with a ΔMD = -1.27, -0.53, and -0.51 dB in mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively. |ΔMD| ≥1 dB occurred with 22% FP and 26% FN in early, 14% FP and 34% FN in moderate, and 16% FP and 51% FN in severe disease. A 1-minute increment in TD produced ΔMDs between -0.35 and -0.40 dB.

CONCLUSIONS

FL have little impact on reliability in patients with established glaucoma. FP, and to a lesser extent FNs and TD, significantly affect reliability. The impact of FP and FN varies with disease severity and over the range of abnormal catch trials. On the basis of our findings, we present evidence-based, severity-specific standards for classifying VF reliability for clinical or research applications.

摘要

目的

评估假阳性(FP)、假阴性(FN)、固视丢失(FL)和检查时长(TD)对不同青光眼严重程度阶段视野(VF)可靠性的影响。

设计

回顾性研究。

参与者

来自909例疑似或确诊青光眼患者1538只眼睛的总共10262次视野检查,且视野检查次数≥5次。

方法

通过纵向数据的多水平模型计算预测平均偏差(MD)。计算预测MD与观察到的MD之间的差异(ΔMD)作为可靠性指标。使用多水平模型评估FP、FN、FL和TD对ΔMD的影响。

主要观察指标

与FP、FN和FL增加10%或TD增加1分钟相关的ΔMD。

结果

FL对ΔMD影响较小(每10%异常捕捉试验<0.2分贝[dB]),在任何疾病阶段,FL水平均未产生≥1 dB的ΔMD。FP导致的MD大于预期,轻度(MD > -6 dB)、中度(-6≤MD < -12 dB)和重度(-12≤MD≤ -20 dB)疾病中,异常捕捉试验增加10%分别与ΔMD = 0.42、0.73和0.66 dB相关,直至20%异常捕捉试验,超过20%异常捕捉试验时,ΔMD = 1.57、2.06和3.53 dB。FN通常导致观察到的MD低于预期MD。在高达20%异常捕捉试验时,FN影响最小(所有严重程度水平下,每10%增加的ΔMD > -0.14 dB)。超过20%异常捕捉试验后,轻度、中度和重度疾病中,异常捕捉试验每增加10%分别与ΔMD = -1.27、-0.53和-0.51 dB相关。在早期疾病中,22%的FP和26%的FN出现|ΔMD|≥1 dB,中度疾病中为14%的FP和34%的FN,重度疾病中为16%的FP和51%的FN。TD增加1分钟产生的ΔMD在-0.35至-0.40 dB之间。

结论

FL对已确诊青光眼患者的可靠性影响较小。FP以及在较小程度上FN和TD显著影响可靠性。FP和FN的影响随疾病严重程度以及异常捕捉试验范围而变化。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出了基于证据的、针对特定严重程度的标准,用于临床或研究应用中视野可靠性的分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/b1940cae6eac/nihms890035f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/b7e6402d3c00/nihms890035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/a6c1974917e2/nihms890035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/7e3b4d7ca870/nihms890035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/b1940cae6eac/nihms890035f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/b7e6402d3c00/nihms890035f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/a6c1974917e2/nihms890035f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/7e3b4d7ca870/nihms890035f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c89f/5675138/b1940cae6eac/nihms890035f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability.基于证据的视野可靠性评估标准。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1612-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.035. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
2
Factors Predicting a Greater Likelihood of Poor Visual Field Reliability in Glaucoma Patients and Suspects.青光眼患者及疑似患者视野可靠性差可能性更高的预测因素。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 30;9(1):4. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.1.4. eCollection 2020 Jan.
3
The Effect of Transitioning from SITA Standard to SITA Faster on Visual Field Performance.从 SITA 标准到 SITA Fast 转换对视场性能的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Oct;128(10):1417-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.03.032. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
4
The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.正常眼中测试可靠性对视野敏感性的影响:新加坡华人眼研究。
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
5
Performance of the visual field index in glaucoma patients with moderately advanced visual field loss.视野指数在中度进展性视野损失的青光眼患者中的表现。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;157(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
6
Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.视野可靠性指数在青光眼排除中的作用。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;133(1):40-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3609.
7
Predictors of Long-Term Visual Field Fluctuation in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者长期视野波动的预测因素。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Jun;127(6):739-747. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
8
Comparing glaucoma progression on 24-2 and 10-2 visual field examinations.比较24-2和10-2视野检查中的青光眼进展情况。
PLoS One. 2015 May 15;10(5):e0127233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127233. eCollection 2015.
9
Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.视野丧失严重程度与青光眼视野进展速度的关系。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Feb;118(2):249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.05.027. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
10
Estimating the Reliability of Glaucomatous Visual Field for the Accurate Assessment of Progression Using the Gaze-Tracking and Reliability Indices.利用注视跟踪和可靠性指数估计青光眼视野,以准确评估进展的可靠性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Mar-Apr;2(2):111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Steady-State PERG Adaptation Reveals Temporal Abnormalities of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Treated Ocular Hypertension and Glaucoma.稳态图形视网膜电图适应揭示治疗性高眼压症和青光眼患者视网膜神经节细胞的时间异常。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 16;15(14):1797. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141797.
2
Rapidly Progressing Glaucoma: Clinical, Structural, and Socioeconomic Drivers of Treatment Escalation.快速进展性青光眼:治疗升级的临床、结构和社会经济驱动因素
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 20:2025.05.18.25327880. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.18.25327880.
3
Development of a reliability criterion for the binocular Esterman visual field test.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of glaucomatous visual field change in a large clinical population.大临床人群中青光眼视野变化的速率。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jun 10;55(7):4135-43. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14643.
2
Visual field progression in glaucoma: what is the specificity of the Guided Progression Analysis?青光眼视野进展:Guided Progression Analysis 的特异性是什么?
Ophthalmology. 2014 Oct;121(10):2023-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage.
双目Esterman视野测试可靠性标准的制定。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s10384-025-01238-8.
4
The effects of transitioning from SITA-Standard to SITA-Fast or SITA-Faster on sensitivities below the measurement floor.从SITA标准模式转换为SITA快速模式或SITA更快模式对低于测量下限的敏感度的影响。
AJO Int. 2025 Jul 6;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100116. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
Effects and Safety of Press-Needle Therapy for Improving Visual Function and Eye Blood Circulation in Patients With Glaucoma With Controlled Intraocular Pressure: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.眼压控制的青光眼患者中揿针疗法改善视功能和眼部血液循环的效果及安全性:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 1;14:e67737. doi: 10.2196/67737.
6
High-Resolution Microperimetry for Detecting Glaucomatous Damage: A Prospective Evaluation of Performance.用于检测青光眼性损伤的高分辨率微视野检查:性能的前瞻性评估
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug;53(6):602-610. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14528. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
7
Detecting glaucoma worsening using optical coherence tomography derived visual field estimates.使用光学相干断层扫描得出的视野估计来检测青光眼病情恶化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 11;15(1):5013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86217-2.
8
Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and the True Rate of Functional and Structural Progression in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study.英国青光眼治疗研究中眼压与功能和结构进展真实率之间的关系
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Jan 2;66(1):32. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.1.32.
9
MAIA and Humphrey Perimetry Differ in Their Estimation of Homonymous Visual Field Defects.MAIA 和 Humphrey 视野计在估计同形同像视野缺损方面存在差异。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 4;13(11):15. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.11.15.
10
Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma.青光眼视野检测中的大数据
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 13;14(3):289-298. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00059. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
评估标准自动视野计在青光眼损害区域的可靠性。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul;121(7):1359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
4
Glaucomatous visual field loss associated with less travel from home.青光眼性视野缺损与离家出行较少有关。
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Feb;91(2):187-93. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000139.
5
Alteration of travel patterns with vision loss from glaucoma and macular degeneration.青光眼和黄斑变性导致视力丧失后出行模式的改变。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;131(11):1420-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4471.
6
The relationship between better-eye and integrated visual field mean deviation and visual disability.好眼与全视野平均偏差和视力障碍之间的关系。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Dec;120(12):2476-2484. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
7
A comparison of false-negative responses for full threshold and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal observers.青光眼患者和正常观察者中全阈值视野检查与SITA标准视野检查假阴性反应的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2014 Jun-Jul;23(5):288-92. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829463ab.
8
Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season.影响青光眼标准自动视野计检查结果的因素:检查可靠性、技师经验、一天中的时间和季节。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Oct 9;53(11):7010-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10268.
9
Visual field loss and accelerometer-measured physical activity in the United States.美国的视野丧失与加速度计测量的身体活动。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
10
A comparison of catch trial methods used in standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者标准自动视野检查中所用捕捉试验方法的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Dec;17(8):626-30. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318168f03e.