• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

traplining 行为的种间变异性。

Inter-individual variability in the foraging behaviour of traplining bumblebees.

机构信息

Research Center on Animal Cognition, Center for Integrative Biology, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), University of Toulouse (UPS), Toulouse, France.

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 4;7(1):4561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04919-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04919-8
PMID:28676725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5496863/
Abstract

Workers of social insects, such as bees, ants and wasps, show some degree of inter-individual variability in decision-making, learning and memory. Whether these natural cognitive differences translate into distinct adaptive behavioural strategies is virtually unknown. Here we examined variability in the movement patterns of bumblebee foragers establishing routes between artificial flowers. We recorded all flower visitation sequences performed by 29 bees tested for 20 consecutive foraging bouts in three experimental arrays, each characterised by a unique spatial configuration of artificial flowers and three-dimensional landmarks. All bees started to develop efficient routes as they accumulated foraging experience in each array, and showed consistent inter-individual differences in their levels of route fidelity and foraging performance, as measured by travel speed and the frequency of revisits to flowers. While the tendency of bees to repeat the same route was influenced by their colony origin, foraging performance was correlated to body size. The largest foragers travelled faster and made less revisits to empty flowers. We discuss the possible adaptive value of such inter-individual variability within the forager caste for optimisation of colony-level foraging performances in social pollinators.

摘要

社会性昆虫(如蜜蜂、蚂蚁和黄蜂)的工蜂在决策、学习和记忆方面表现出一定程度的个体间可变性。这些自然认知差异是否转化为独特的适应性行为策略还知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了在人工花朵之间建立路线的熊蜂觅食者的运动模式的可变性。我们记录了在三个实验数组中测试的 29 只蜜蜂在 20 次连续觅食回合中执行的所有花朵访问序列,每个数组的人工花朵和三维地标具有独特的空间配置。所有蜜蜂在每个数组中积累觅食经验时,都会开始开发有效的路线,并且在路线保真度和觅食表现方面表现出一致的个体间差异,这些差异通过旅行速度和花朵重复访问的频率来衡量。虽然蜜蜂重复相同路线的趋势受到其群体起源的影响,但觅食表现与体型相关。最大的觅食者旅行速度更快,对空花的访问次数更少。我们讨论了这种觅食者群体内的个体间可变性在优化社会性传粉者的群体水平觅食表现方面的可能适应性价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/5b3cf0af3d96/41598_2017_4919_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/a65a902a35e7/41598_2017_4919_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/4703d7a9c2b0/41598_2017_4919_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/516d25c7e293/41598_2017_4919_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/9f4d888e9c22/41598_2017_4919_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/5b3cf0af3d96/41598_2017_4919_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/a65a902a35e7/41598_2017_4919_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/4703d7a9c2b0/41598_2017_4919_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/516d25c7e293/41598_2017_4919_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/9f4d888e9c22/41598_2017_4919_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46e/5496863/5b3cf0af3d96/41598_2017_4919_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Inter-individual variability in the foraging behaviour of traplining bumblebees.traplining 行为的种间变异性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 4;7(1):4561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04919-8.
2
Traplining in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens): a foraging strategy's ontogeny and the importance of spatial reference memory in short-range foraging.熊蜂(西方蜜蜂)的路线记忆:一种觅食策略的个体发育以及空间参考记忆在短程觅食中的重要性。
Oecologia. 2007 Apr;151(4):719-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0607-9. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
3
Intraspecific variation in body size of bumblebee workers influences anti-predator behaviour.同种蜂群工蜂个体大小的变化会影响其防御行为。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Feb;89(2):658-669. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13135. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
4
Bumblebees learn foraging routes through exploitation-exploration cycles.大黄蜂通过利用-探索循环来学习觅食路线。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Jul 26;16(156):20190103. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0103. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
A model of resource partitioning between foraging bees based on learning.基于学习的觅食蜜蜂之间资源分配模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 28;17(7):e1009260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009260. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Monitoring Flower Visitation Networks and Interactions between Pairs of Bumble Bees in a Large Outdoor Flight Cage.在大型户外飞行笼中监测花朵访花网络及成对熊蜂之间的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 16;11(3):e0150844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150844. eCollection 2016.
7
Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants.传粉者的路线觅食:其个体发育、经济学原理及对植物可能产生的影响
Ann Bot. 2009 Jun;103(9):1365-78. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp088. Epub 2009 Apr 26.
8
Travel optimization by foraging bumblebees through readjustments of traplines after discovery of new feeding locations.通过在发现新的觅食地点后调整陷阱线,让觅食的大黄蜂进行旅行优化。
Am Nat. 2010 Dec;176(6):744-57. doi: 10.1086/657042. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
9
A simple iterative model accurately captures complex trapline formation by bumblebees across spatial scales and flower arrangements.一个简单的迭代模型准确地捕捉了大黄蜂在不同空间尺度和花型排列下形成复杂的巡回路线的行为。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002938. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
10
Evidence of trapline foraging in honeybees.蜜蜂采用路线觅食的证据。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Aug 15;219(Pt 16):2426-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.143214. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Demonstrating the reproductive consequences of cognition: learning from experience.展示认知的生殖后果:从经验中学习。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jun 26;380(1929):20240115. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0115.
2
Ant foraging: optimizing self-organization as a solution to a traveling salesman problem.蚂蚁觅食:优化自组织以解决旅行商问题。
Oecologia. 2025 Apr 30;207(5):73. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05720-5.
3
Trapline foraging by nectar-collecting hornets.采蜜黄蜂的路线觅食行为。

本文引用的文献

1
A Lévy-flight diffusion model to predict transgenic pollen dispersal.一种用于预测转基因花粉扩散的 Lévy 飞行扩散模型。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jan;14(126). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0889.
2
Why Bees Are So Vulnerable to Environmental Stressors.为什么蜜蜂如此容易受到环境胁迫的影响。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Apr;32(4):268-278. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
3
BEESCOUT: A model of bee scouting behaviour and a software tool for characterizing nectar/pollen landscapes for BEEHAVE.蜜蜂侦察兵:一种蜜蜂侦察行为模型以及用于为BEEHAVE描绘花蜜/花粉景观的软件工具。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Apr 19;28(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01952-3.
4
Roads are partial barriers to foraging solitary bees in an urban landscape.在城市景观中,道路对独居蜜蜂觅食构成部分障碍。
Oecologia. 2024 Dec 9;207(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s00442-024-05652-6.
5
Age dominates flight distance and duration, while body size shapes flight speed in L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae).在 L.(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)中,年龄主导着飞行距离和时间,而体型则决定着飞行速度。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jul;291(2027):20241001. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1001. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Using motion-detection cameras to monitor foraging behaviour of individual butterflies.使用运动检测摄像头监测个体蝴蝶的觅食行为。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 21;14(7):e70032. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70032. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Bumblebee flower constancy and pollen diversity over time.大黄蜂随时间变化的访花专一性和花粉多样性。
Behav Ecol. 2023 Apr 10;34(4):602-612. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad028. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
8
Modeling bee movement shows how a perceptual masking effect can influence flower discovery.建模蜜蜂的运动展示了感知掩蔽效应如何影响花朵的发现。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Mar 24;19(3):e1010558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010558. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Prior associations affect bumblebees' generalization performance in a tool-selection task.先前的关联会影响大黄蜂在工具选择任务中的泛化表现。
iScience. 2022 Oct 31;25(11):105466. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105466. eCollection 2022 Nov 18.
10
Substantial variability in morphological scaling among bumblebee colonies.大黄蜂群体之间形态缩放存在显著差异。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 12;9(1):211436. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211436. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Ecol Modell. 2016 Nov 24;340:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.013.
4
Life-Long Radar Tracking of Bumblebees.大黄蜂的终身雷达跟踪
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160333. eCollection 2016.
5
Evidence of trapline foraging in honeybees.蜜蜂采用路线觅食的证据。
J Exp Biol. 2016 Aug 15;219(Pt 16):2426-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.143214. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Honey bee workers that are pollen stressed as larvae become poor foragers and waggle dancers as adults.幼虫期承受花粉压力的蜜蜂工蜂成年后会成为差劲的觅食者和摇摆舞舞者。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0121731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121731. eCollection 2015.
7
Parasites and personality in periwinkles (Littorina littorea): Infection status is associated with mean-level boldness but not repeatability.滨螺(Littorina littorea)中的寄生虫与个性:感染状态与平均大胆程度相关,但与重复性无关。
Behav Processes. 2015 Jun;115:132-4. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
8
High interindividual variability in dose-dependent reduction in speed of movement after exposing C. elegans to shock waves.秀丽隐杆线虫暴露于冲击波后,运动速度的剂量依赖性降低存在高度个体间差异。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Feb 6;9:12. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00012. eCollection 2015.
9
Group personality during collective decision-making: a multi-level approach.集体决策过程中的群体人格:一种多层次方法。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Mar 7;282(1802). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2515.
10
Interindividual variability in social insects - proximate causes and ultimate consequences.社会性昆虫的个体间变异性——近因和终级后果。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Aug;89(3):671-87. doi: 10.1111/brv.12074. Epub 2013 Dec 17.