Multipurpose Intensive Care Service, Sainte Musse Hospital, Toulon, France -
Department of Research and Development, Hamilton Medical AG, Bonaduz, Switzerland -
Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-67. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11963-2. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
There is an equipoise regarding closed-loop ventilation modes and the ability to reduce workload for providers. On one hand some settings are managed by the ventilator but on another hand the automatic mode introduces new settings for the user.
This randomized controlled trial compared the number of manual ventilator setting changes between a full closed loop ventilation and oxygenation mode (INTELLiVENT-ASV®) and conventional ventilation modes (volume assist control and pressure support) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. The secondary endpoints were to compare the number of arterial blood gas analysis, the sedation dose and the user acceptance. Sixty subjects with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation of at least 48 hours were randomized to be ventilated using INTELLiVENT-ASV® or conventional modes with a protocolized weaning. All manual ventilator setting changes were recorded continuously from inclusion to successful extubation or death. Arterial blood gases were performed upon decision of the clinician in charge. User acceptance score was assessed for nurses and physicians once daily using a Likert Scale.
The number of manual ventilator setting changes per 24 h-period per subject was lower in INTELLiVENT-ASV® as compared to conventional ventilation group (5 [4-7] versus 10 [7-17]) manuals settings per subject per day [P<0.001]). The number of arterial blood gas analysis and the sedation doses were not significantly different between the groups. Nurses and physicians reported that INTELLiVENT-ASV® was significantly easier to use as compared to conventional ventilation (P<0.001 for nurses and P<0.01 for physicians).
For mechanically ventilated ICU patients, INTELLiVENT-ASV® significantly reduces the number of manual ventilator setting changes with the same number of arterial blood gas analysis and sedation dose, and is easier to use for the caregivers as compared to conventional ventilation modes.
关于闭环通气模式和减轻医护人员工作负荷的能力,目前尚无定论。一方面,某些设置由呼吸机管理,但另一方面,自动模式会为用户引入新的设置。
本随机对照试验比较了完全闭环通气和氧合模式(INTELLiVENT-ASV®)与常规通气模式(容量辅助控制和压力支持)在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中,在机械通气时间预计至少 48 小时的患者中,使用 INTELLiVENT-ASV®或常规模式进行通气,并进行协议化撤机。所有手动呼吸机设置更改均从纳入开始至成功拔管或死亡期间连续记录。动脉血气分析根据主管医生的决定进行。使用李克特量表,每天一次对护士和医生进行用户接受度评分。
与常规通气组相比,INTELLiVENT-ASV®组每 24 小时每位患者的手动呼吸机设置更改次数更少(5[4-7]与 10[7-17])[P<0.001])。两组之间动脉血气分析和镇静剂量无显著差异。护士和医生报告说,与常规通气相比,INTELLiVENT-ASV®的使用明显更容易(护士为 P<0.001,医生为 P<0.01)。
对于机械通气的 ICU 患者,与常规通气模式相比,INTELLiVENT-ASV®可显著减少手动呼吸机设置更改的次数,而动脉血气分析和镇静剂量相同,并且更容易为护理人员使用。