van Hateren J H
Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Biol Theory. 2017;12(2):112-126. doi: 10.1007/s13752-017-0261-y. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
A new theory that naturalizes biological function is explained and compared with earlier etiological and causal role theories. Etiological (or selected effects) theories explain functions from how they are caused over their evolutionary history. Causal role theories analyze how functional mechanisms serve the current capacities of their containing system. The new proposal unifies the key notions of both kinds of theories, but goes beyond them by explaining how functions in an organism can exist as factors with autonomous causal efficacy. The goal-directedness and normativity of functions exist in this strict sense as well. The theory depends on an internal physiological or neural process that mimics an organism's fitness, and modulates the organism's variability accordingly. The structure of the internal process can be subdivided into subprocesses that monitor specific functions in an organism. The theory matches well with each intuition on a previously published list of intuited ideas about biological functions, including intuitions that have posed difficulties for other theories.
一种将生物功能自然化的新理论得到了解释,并与早期的病因学和因果作用理论进行了比较。病因学(或选择效应)理论从功能在其进化历史中的产生方式来解释功能。因果作用理论分析功能机制如何服务于其所在系统的当前能力。新提议统一了这两种理论的关键概念,但通过解释生物体中的功能如何作为具有自主因果效力的因素而存在,超越了它们。功能的目标导向性和规范性在这种严格意义上也存在。该理论依赖于一种模仿生物体适应性的内部生理或神经过程,并相应地调节生物体的变异性。内部过程的结构可以细分为监测生物体特定功能的子过程。该理论与之前发表的一份关于生物功能的直观想法列表中的每一种直觉都非常契合,包括那些给其他理论带来困难的直觉。