Kim Younsoo, Seok Jin Myoung, Park Jongkyu, Kim Kun-Hyun, Min Ju-Hong, Cho Jin Whan, Park Suyeon, Kim Hyun-Jin, Kim Byoung Joon, Youn Jinyoung
Department of Neurology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Department of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 6;12(7):e0180744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180744. eCollection 2017.
Differentiation of multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism (MSA-P) and Parkinson's disease (PD) is important, but an effective tool for differentiation has not been identified. We investigated the efficacy of the composite autonomic symptom scale 31 (COMPASS 31) questionnaire as a tool for evaluating autonomic function in parkinsonism patients. In this study, we enrolled drug-naïve patients with MSA-P and PD, and administered the COMPASS-31 and an objective autonomic dysfunction test (AFT). Demographic and clinical data, including parkinsonism and autonomic dysfunction, were compared between the two groups. Additionally, we determined the optimal COMPASS 31 cut-off score to differentiate MSA-P from PD for use as a screening tool. In this study, 27 MSA-P patients and 41 PD patients were recruited. The total COMPASS 31 score was well correlated with the objective AFT results. When we compared the COMPASS 31 score between the two groups, MSA-P patients showed higher total scores and sub-scores in the orthostatic intolerance, gastrointestinal, and bladder domains compared with PD patients. Similarly, MSA-P patients had more abnormalities in expiration to inspiration ratio, Valsalva ratio and pressure recovery time than PD patients in objective AFT. With 13.25 as the cut-off score for diagnosis of MSA-P, the total COMPASS-31 score demonstrated high sensitivity (92.6%) and moderate specificity (51.2%) with an area under the curve of 0.765. Based on our results, the COMPASS 31 is an effective tool for evaluation of autonomic function in patients with parkinsonism. The COMPASS-31 could be used as a sensitive and convenient screening tool, especially for the differentiation between MSA-P and PD.
多系统萎缩帕金森综合征型(MSA-P)与帕金森病(PD)的鉴别诊断很重要,但尚未找到有效的鉴别工具。我们研究了复合自主神经症状量表31(COMPASS 31)问卷作为评估帕金森综合征患者自主神经功能工具的有效性。在本研究中,我们纳入了未服用过药物的MSA-P和PD患者,并对其进行COMPASS-31问卷调查以及客观自主神经功能障碍测试(AFT)。比较了两组患者的人口统计学和临床数据,包括帕金森综合征和自主神经功能障碍情况。此外,我们确定了用于鉴别MSA-P和PD的COMPASS 31最佳临界值,以用作筛查工具。本研究共招募了27例MSA-P患者和41例PD患者。COMPASS 31总分与客观AFT结果高度相关。当比较两组的COMPASS 31评分时,MSA-P患者在体位性不耐受、胃肠道和膀胱领域的总分及分项得分均高于PD患者。同样,在客观AFT中,MSA-P患者在呼气与吸气比值、瓦尔萨尔瓦动作比值和压力恢复时间方面的异常情况比PD患者更多。以13.25作为诊断MSA-P的临界值时,COMPASS-31总分显示出高敏感性(92.6%)和中等特异性(51.2%),曲线下面积为0.765。基于我们的研究结果,COMPASS 31是评估帕金森综合征患者自主神经功能的有效工具。COMPASS-31可作为一种敏感且便捷的筛查工具,尤其用于MSA-P和PD的鉴别诊断。