Yar Talay, Salem Ayad M, Rafique Nazish, Latif Rabia, Siddiqui Intisar A, Shaikh Mohammad H, Aleid Mohammed A, Almahfoudh Husain H, Alsaffar Mohammed F, Al Ibrahim Abdullah H, Almadan Ali J, Alaidarous Sana M, Almulhim Razan A
Department of Physiology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Dental Education, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
J Family Community Med. 2024 Jul-Sep;31(3):214-221. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_20_24. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
Composite Autonomic Symptom Score-31 (COMPASS-31) is an easy-to-use screening tool for the evaluation of autonomic dysfunction in various diseases affecting neural function but has rarely been used in the assessment of long coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the COMPASS-31 score in detecting dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system in patients 3 months after COVID-19 infection.
Fifty-nine subjects were recruited and grouped into 2: (a) controls ( = 31) who had never had positive polymerase chain reaction results for COVID-19 before and (b) the post-COVID-19 patients ( = 28) who had confirmed COVID-19 infection 3-6 months before recruitment. COMPASS-31 questionnaire was utilized to evaluate subjective symptoms or evidence of autonomic dysfunction. Autonomic dysfunction was assessed objectively by cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs) and heart rate variability (HRV). For comparison of quantitative variables between two groups, t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate, were used. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), negative likelihood ratio (LR), and positive LR were used as measures of diagnostic accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the overall accuracy of COMPASS-31.
The median COMPASS score was found to be significantly higher in post-COVID-19 participants than controls (15.5 vs. 10, = 0.021). The median total CART score was also significantly higher in post-COVID-19 participants (0 vs. 1, < 0.001). Out of 6 domains of the COMPASS score, the median value for orthostatic dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in post-COVID-19 participants than controls (12 vs. 0, = 0.008). There was significantly fair accuracy of the COMPASS score with an area under the receiver operating curve 0.68 (0.54-0.82) following the total CART score ≥2 as the gold standard in the diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction ( = 0.021). The best cutoff point of the total COMPASS score was 12.5, where the optimal values of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were achieved. Nonsignificant and weak correlations between CARTs, HRV parameters, and COMPASS score were found.
COMPASS-31 could be used as a user-friendly screening tool to detect autonomic dysfunction in post-COVID-19 cases with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.
复合自主神经症状评分-31(COMPASS-31)是一种易于使用的筛查工具,用于评估影响神经功能的各种疾病中的自主神经功能障碍,但很少用于评估2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。本研究旨在评估COMPASS-31评分在检测COVID-19感染后3个月患者自主神经系统功能障碍方面的诊断准确性。
招募59名受试者并分为两组:(a)对照组(n = 31),之前COVID-19聚合酶链反应结果从未呈阳性;(b)COVID-19后患者(n = 28),在招募前3-6个月确诊感染COVID-19。使用COMPASS-31问卷评估自主神经功能障碍的主观症状或证据。通过心血管自主反射测试(CARTs)和心率变异性(HRV)客观评估自主神经功能障碍。对于两组之间定量变量的比较,酌情使用t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验。敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性似然比(LR)和阳性LR用作诊断准确性的指标。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定了COMPASS-31的总体准确性。
发现COVID-19后参与者的COMPASS评分中位数显著高于对照组(15.5对10,P = 0.021)。COVID-19后参与者的CART总评分中位数也显著更高(0对1,P < 0.001)。在COMPASS评分的6个领域中,发现COVID-19后参与者的直立性功能障碍中位数显著高于对照组(12对0,P = 0.008)。以总CART评分≥2作为自主神经功能障碍诊断的金标准时,COMPASS评分的准确性中等,受试者工作曲线下面积为0.68(0.54-0.82)(P = 0.021)。COMPASS总评分的最佳截断点为12.5,此时敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值达到最佳值。发现CARTs、HRV参数与COMPASS评分之间存在非显著且微弱的相关性。
COMPASS-31可作为一种用户友好的筛查工具,以可接受的敏感性和特异性检测COVID-19后病例中的自主神经功能障碍。