Suppr超能文献

鼻中隔成形术后放置莫匹罗星和夫西地酸鼻填充物对鼻腔细菌谱的影响。

The effect of mupirocin- and fusidic acid-nasal packings, placed after septoplasty, on the nasal bacterial profile.

作者信息

Bilici Suat, Durna Yusuf Muhammed, Yigit Ozgur, Karatas Aysel, Cimen Cansu, Fincancı Muzaffer, Gökduman Ali Rıza

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2016 Jan 1;7(4):207-212. doi: 10.2500/ar.2016.7.0181.

Abstract

AIM

To examine the effects, after septoplasty, of local antibiotic pomades as an alternative to prophylactic antibiotic use, which is a controversial matter among the otolaryngologists, on nasal flora and bacterial growth.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Nasal packings placed after septoplasty surgery to provide septal stabilization and bleeding control pose a risk in terms of infection. In this study, 106 patients, who were examined by comparing mupirocin- and fusidic acid-soaked packings and antibiotic-free packings, were divided into three groups. Nasal cultures were obtained from each patient twice, before the surgery and on the second day immediately after the packings were removed, and the culture results were statistically compared.

RESULTS

In the mupirocin group (group 2), postoperative normal flora growth rate was significantly higher than in the fusidic acid group (group 3) and the antibiotic-free group (group 1) (p < 0.024). In the mupirocin group (group 2), the gram-positive growth rate in the postoperative period showed a significant decrease when compared when the preoperative period (p < 0.05) (5.7%). In the fusidic acid group (group 3), the postoperative gram-positive rate showed a significant decrease compared with the preoperative period (p < 0.05). In group 2, the postoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rate showed a significant decrease than in the preoperative period (2.9%) (p < 0.05). Similarly, in group 3, the postoperative methicillin-resistant S. aureus rate showed a significant decrease compared with that of the preoperative period (11.1%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Use of mupirocin- and fusidic acid-soaked nasal packings after septoplasty significantly decreased, especially, postoperative gram-positive bacterial growth in nasal cultures. Although systemic antibiotherapy was not administered, the lack of local and systemic infection findings was an important result that we obtained in terms of clinical use. Usage advantages of mupirocin and fusidic acid soaked packings are an easily applicable, cost-effective, and safe method.

摘要

目的

在鼻中隔成形术后,研究局部抗生素软膏作为预防性抗生素使用的替代方法(这在耳鼻喉科医生中存在争议)对鼻腔菌群和细菌生长的影响。

材料与方法

鼻中隔成形术后放置鼻腔填塞物以稳定鼻中隔和控制出血,这在感染方面存在风险。在本研究中,106例患者通过比较莫匹罗星和夫西地酸浸泡的填塞物与无抗生素填塞物进行检查,并分为三组。在手术前和取出填塞物后的第二天,从每位患者身上获取两次鼻拭子培养样本,并对培养结果进行统计学比较。

结果

在莫匹罗星组(第2组),术后正常菌群生长率显著高于夫西地酸组(第3组)和无抗生素组(第1组)(p < 0.024)。在莫匹罗星组(第2组),术后革兰氏阳性菌生长率与术前相比显著降低(p < 0.05)(5.7%)。在夫西地酸组(第3组),术后革兰氏阳性菌率与术前相比显著降低(p < 0.05)。在第2组中,术后耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌率与术前相比显著降低(2.9%)(p < 0.05)。同样,在第3组中,术后耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌率与术前相比显著降低(11.1%)(p < 0.05)。

结论

鼻中隔成形术后使用莫匹罗星和夫西地酸浸泡的鼻腔填塞物显著降低了鼻腔培养物中术后革兰氏阳性菌的生长,尤其是。尽管未进行全身抗生素治疗,但缺乏局部和全身感染迹象是我们在临床应用方面获得的重要结果。莫匹罗星和夫西地酸浸泡的填塞物的使用优势是一种易于应用、经济高效且安全的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad2d/5244280/3f1a689d9bb8/arh0031601810001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验