Suppr超能文献

肌肉注射阿法沙龙联合布托啡诺用于猫的镇静。

Intramuscular injection of alfaxalone in combination with butorphanol for sedation in cats.

作者信息

Deutsch Julia, Jolliffe Colette, Archer Emma, Leece Elizabeth A

机构信息

Animal Health Trust, Kentford, Newmarket, UK.

Animal Health Trust, Kentford, Newmarket, UK.

出版信息

Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017 Jul;44(4):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.05.014. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess quality of sedation following intramuscular (IM) injection of two doses of alfaxalone in combination with butorphanol in cats.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, 'blinded' clinical study.

ANIMALS

A total of 38 cats undergoing diagnostic imaging or noninvasive procedures.

METHODS

Cats were allocated randomly to be administered butorphanol 0.2 mg kg combined with alfaxalone 2 mg kg (group AB2) or 5 mg kg (group AB5) IM. If sedation was inadequate, alfaxalone 2 mg kg IM was administered and cats were excluded from further analysis. Temperament [1 (friendly) to 5 (aggressive)], response to injection, sedation score at 2, 6, 8, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 minutes, overall sedation quality scored after data collection [1 (excellent) to 4 (inadequate)] and recovery quality were assessed. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f) and arterial haemoglobin saturation (SpO) were recorded every 5 minutes. Groups were compared using t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. Sedation was analysed using two-way anova, and additional alfaxalone using Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Groups were similar for sex, age, body mass and response to injection. Temperament score was lower in group AB2 [2 (1-3)] compared to AB5 [3 (1-5)] (p = 0.006). Group AB5 had better sedation at 6, 8, 20 and 30 minutes and overall sedation quality was better in AB5 [1 (1-3)], compared to AB2 [3 (1-4)] (p = 0.0001). Additional alfaxalone was required for 11 cats in AB2 and two in AB5 (p = 0.005). Recovery quality, HR, f and SpO were similar. Seven cats required oxygen supplementation. Complete recovery times were shorter in AB2 (81.8 ± 24.3 versus 126.6 ± 33.3 minutes; p = 0.009). Twitching was the most common adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In combination with butorphanol, IM alfaxalone at 5 mg kg provided better quality sedation than 2 mg kg. Monitoring of SpO is recommended.

摘要

目的

评估猫肌肉注射两剂阿法沙龙与布托啡诺联合使用后的镇静质量。

研究设计

前瞻性、随机、“盲法”临床研究。

动物

总共38只接受诊断性成像或非侵入性检查的猫。

方法

将猫随机分为两组,分别肌肉注射0.2mg/kg布托啡诺与2mg/kg阿法沙龙(AB2组)或5mg/kg阿法沙龙(AB5组)。如果镇静效果不佳,则肌肉注射2mg/kg阿法沙龙,这些猫被排除在进一步分析之外。评估猫的性情[1(友好)至5(攻击性)]、对注射的反应、在2、6、8、15、20、30、40、50和60分钟时的镇静评分、数据收集后评估的总体镇静质量[1(优秀)至4(不足)]以及恢复质量。每5分钟记录心率(HR)、呼吸频率(f)和动脉血红蛋白饱和度(SpO)。使用t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验对两组进行比较。使用双向方差分析分析镇静情况,使用费舍尔精确检验分析额外使用阿法沙龙的情况(p<0.05)。

结果

两组在性别、年龄、体重和对注射的反应方面相似。AB2组的性情评分[2(1 - 3)]低于AB5组[3(1 - 5)](p = 0.006)。AB5组在6、8、20和30分钟时镇静效果更好,与AB2组[3(1 - 4)]相比,AB5组的总体镇静质量更好[1(1 - 3)](p = 0.0001)。AB2组有11只猫需要额外注射阿法沙龙,AB5组有2只猫需要额外注射(p = 0.005)。恢复质量、HR、f和SpO相似。7只猫需要补充氧气。AB2组的完全恢复时间更短(81.8±24.3分钟对126.6±33.3分钟;p = 0.009)。抽搐是最常见的不良事件。

结论及临床意义

与布托啡诺联合使用时,5mg/kg肌肉注射阿法沙龙比2mg/kg提供更好的镇静质量。建议监测SpO。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验