Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 455, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Community Health. 2018 Feb;43(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0394-8.
Media coverage of tobacco industry corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives represents a competitive field where tobacco control advocates and the tobacco industry vie to shape public and policymaker understandings about tobacco control and the industry. Through a content analysis of 649 US news items, we examined US media coverage of tobacco industry CSR and identified characteristics of media items associated with positive coverage. Most coverage appeared in local newspapers, and CSR initiatives unrelated to tobacco, with non-controversial beneficiaries, were most commonly mentioned. Coverage was largely positive. Tobacco control advocates were infrequently cited as sources and rarely authored opinion pieces; however, when their voices were included, coverage was less likely to have a positive slant. Media items published in the South, home to several tobacco company headquarters, were more likely than those published in the West to have a positive slant. The absence of tobacco control advocates from media coverage represents a missed opportunity to influence opinion regarding the negative public health implications of tobacco industry CSR. Countering the media narrative of virtuous companies doing good deeds could be particularly beneficial in the South, where the burdens of tobacco-caused disease are greatest, and coverage of tobacco companies more positive.
媒体对烟草业企业社会责任(CSR)举措的报道是一个竞争激烈的领域,控烟倡导者和烟草业在这一领域竞相塑造公众和政策制定者对控烟和该行业的理解。通过对 649 篇美国新闻报道的内容分析,我们考察了美国媒体对烟草业 CSR 的报道,并确定了与正面报道相关的媒体报道特征。大多数报道出现在地方报纸上,与烟草无关、受益方无争议的 CSR 举措最常被提及。报道基本上是正面的。控烟倡导者很少被引为消息来源,也很少撰写评论文章;然而,当他们的声音被包括在内时,报道就不太可能有正面倾向。在南方(几个烟草公司总部所在地)出版的媒体报道比在西部出版的更有可能有正面倾向。媒体报道中缺乏控烟倡导者,这是一个错失的机会,无法影响公众对烟草业 CSR 对公共健康的负面影响的看法。在南方,由于烟草导致的疾病负担最大,而且对烟草公司的报道更为正面,因此反驳媒体关于做好事的企业有道德的说法可能特别有益。