Suppr超能文献

非侵入性产前检测对联合早孕期筛查后高风险或低风险染色体异常孕妇焦虑的影响。

The impact of non-invasive prenatal testing on anxiety in women considered at high or low risk for aneuploidy after combined first trimester screening.

机构信息

Department of Medical Genomics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

School of Genetic Medicine, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2017 Oct;37(10):975-982. doi: 10.1002/pd.5110. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to (1) examine the psychological impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in women with a high-risk (≥1 : 300) and low-risk (≤1 : 301) result on combined first trimester screening (cFTS) and (2) to examine factors influencing anxiety and decision-making in both risk populations.

METHOD

Questionnaires and structured interviews were administered to low (n = 50) and high (n = 63) risk women at the time of NIPT blood draw (point A) and again at least 1 week after receiving their NIPT result (point B). Anxiety levels were measured at these two time points using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

RESULTS

Both high-risk and low-risk cFTS groups demonstrated similar intrinsic (trait) anxiety levels (36 ± 10 vs 35 ± 10; p = 0.70). High-risk women had significantly higher levels of state anxiety at point A than low-risk women (42 ± 11 vs 36 ± 11; p < 0.01). Both groups had a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.01), to similar final levels of state anxiety at point B (30 ± 11 vs 29 ± 8; p = 0.61).

CONCLUSION

Women receiving a high-risk result on cFTS have higher levels of state anxiety than their low-risk counterparts. Following a low-risk NIPT result, the anxiety levels in both populations are reduced to similar levels. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(1)探讨在联合早孕期筛查(cFTS)中,高风险(≥1:300)和低风险(≤1:301)结果的女性接受非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)的心理影响;(2)检验影响这两个风险人群焦虑和决策的因素。

方法

在 NIPT 采血时(A 点),对低风险(n=50)和高风险(n=63)的女性进行问卷调查和结构化访谈,并在至少 1 周后收到 NIPT 结果时(B 点)再次进行问卷调查和结构化访谈。在这两个时间点使用状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)测量焦虑水平。

结果

高危和低危 cFTS 组的内在(特质)焦虑水平相似(36±10 vs 35±10;p=0.70)。高风险女性在 A 点的状态焦虑水平显著高于低风险女性(42±11 vs 36±11;p<0.01)。两组的状态焦虑均显著降低(p<0.01),在 B 点达到相似的最终水平(30±11 vs 29±8;p=0.61)。

结论

在 cFTS 中接受高风险结果的女性比低风险女性的状态焦虑水平更高。在接受低风险 NIPT 结果后,这两个人群的焦虑水平均降低至相似水平。©2017 约翰威立父子公司

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验