Ren Wen, Hasenbieke Nulanbieke, Liu Ying, Qiu Yan, Zhou Zhao-Nong, Mao Xiao-Yan, Ren Jing-Jing
Department of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China.
Training Center of the National Population and Family Planning Commission, Beijing 100024, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 20;130(14):1689-1693. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.209894.
General practitioner (GP) preceptors play an important role in the cultivation of GPs. Many problems exist in the training of GP preceptors. This study aimed to explore the willingness and training needs of GP preceptors and compare the differences between preceptors from general practice and other specialties.
A total of 375 questionnaire forms were sent to 375 GP preceptors from 11 different provinces, and 344 completed forms were returned. The main outcome included general information, teaching motivations, and training needs of GP preceptors.
The study showed that about 89.2% of GP preceptors were willing to be teachers. The majority of respondents strongly agreed that the motivation for becoming a GP supervisor was to learn from teaching. The most important capability they should master was clinical teaching (92.2%), followed by lecture (83.1%) and doctor-patient communication (83.1%). The top three preferred methods of GP preceptors training were case discussion (78.8%), workshop (57.6%), and classroom teaching (56.4%). The domains in which most GP preceptors wanted to acquire knowledge and skill were mental health (59.3%), rehabilitation (47.1%), pediatrics (41.0%), and obstetrics (37.5%). No significant differences were found in the willingness to train GPs (χ2 = 3.34, P > 0.05) and whether they would become or continue to become a GP supervisor after the training (χ2 = 1.106, P > 0.05).
Although most preceptors were under on-the-job training, they were glad to train GPs. To be qualified, preceptors should be trained according to the actual needs of GP preceptors.
全科医生带教老师在全科医生培养中发挥着重要作用。全科医生带教老师培训存在诸多问题。本研究旨在探讨全科医生带教老师的带教意愿及培训需求,并比较全科医疗专业与其他专业带教老师之间的差异。
向来自11个不同省份的375名全科医生带教老师发放375份问卷,回收有效问卷344份。主要研究内容包括全科医生带教老师的一般信息、带教动机及培训需求。
研究表明,约89.2%的全科医生带教老师愿意担任带教工作。大多数受访者强烈认同成为全科医生带教老师的动机是从带教中学习。他们应掌握的最重要能力是临床带教(92.2%),其次是授课(83.1%)和医患沟通(83.1%)。全科医生带教老师培训的前三种首选方式是病例讨论(78.8%)、工作坊(57.6%)和课堂教学(56.4%)。大多数全科医生带教老师希望获取知识和技能的领域是心理健康(59.3%)、康复(47.1%)、儿科(41.0%)和产科(37.5%)。在带教意愿(χ2 = 3.34,P > 0.05)以及培训后是否会成为或继续担任全科医生带教老师(χ2 = 1.106,P > 0.05)方面未发现显著差异。
尽管大多数带教老师接受在职培训,但他们乐意带教全科医生。为使其胜任工作,应根据全科医生带教老师的实际需求进行培训。