Spencer Chelsea M, Rivas-Koehl Matthew, Astle Shelby, Toews Michelle L, Anders Kristin M, McAllister Paige
Couple and Family Therapy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Oct;24(4):2486-2497. doi: 10.1177/15248380221097437. Epub 2022 May 12.
Sexual assault (SA) on college campuses remains a prominent public health issue. This meta-analysis focuses on identifying all potential risk markers for college male SA perpetration. Using standard search procedures, a total of 25 studies yielding 89 unique effect sizes were included in the study. Significant risk markers were related to hegemonic masculinity (e.g., peer approval of SA, rape myth acceptance, sexist beliefs, hostility towards women), other forms of dating violence perpetration (e.g., physical and psychological dating violence perpetration), and the college party culture (e.g., binge drinking, alcohol and substance use, frequency of hook-ups). Psychological dating violence victimization, athletic team membership, race/ethnicity, relationship status, and religiosity were not significant risk markers for SA perpetration. Findings support potential benefits of SA prevention efforts prioritizing peer education/student leaders modeling SA disapproval, challenging hegemonic masculinity, healthy relationship and sexual education, as well as alcohol and substance use awareness.
大学校园中的性侵犯仍是一个突出的公共卫生问题。这项荟萃分析专注于识别大学男性实施性侵犯的所有潜在风险指标。通过标准搜索程序，该研究共纳入了25项研究，产生了89个独特的效应量。显著的风险指标与霸权男性气质（例如，对性侵犯的同伴认可、对强奸谬论的接受、性别歧视观念、对女性的敌意）、其他形式的约会暴力行为（例如，身体和心理上的约会暴力行为）以及大学派对文化（例如，狂饮、饮酒和药物使用、随意性行为的频率）有关。心理约会暴力受害经历、运动队成员身份、种族/民族、恋爱状况和宗教信仰并非实施性侵犯的显著风险指标。研究结果支持了性侵犯预防工作的潜在益处，这些工作优先考虑同伴教育/学生领袖树立反对性侵犯的榜样、挑战霸权男性气质、开展健康关系和性教育，以及提高对酒精和药物使用的认识。
