Suppr超能文献

循证管理在医疗管理决策中的应用。

Use of evidence-based management in healthcare administration decision-making.

作者信息

Guo Ruiling, Berkshire Steven D, Fulton Lawrence V, Hermanson Patrick M

机构信息

Health Care Administration, Kasiska School of Health Professions, Idaho State University , Pocatello, Idaho, USA.

Department of Health Administration, College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University , Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2017 Jul 3;30(3):330-342. doi: 10.1108/LHS-07-2016-0033.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine whether healthcare leaders use evidence-based management (EBMgt) when facing major decisions and what types of evidence healthcare administrators consult during their decision-making. This study also intends to identify any relationship that might exist among adoption of EBMgt in healthcare management, attitudes towards EBMgt, demographic characteristics and organizational characteristics. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study was conducted among US healthcare leaders. Spearman's correlation and logistic regression were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 23.0. Findings One hundred and fifty-four healthcare leaders completed the survey. The study results indicated that 90 per cent of the participants self-reported having used an EBMgt approach for decision-making. Professional experiences (87 per cent), organizational data (84 per cent) and stakeholders' values (63 per cent) were the top three types of evidence consulted daily and weekly for decision-making. Case study (75 per cent) and scientific research findings (75 per cent) were the top two types of evidence consulted monthly or less than once a month. An exploratory, stepwise logistic regression model correctly classified 75.3 per cent of all observations for a dichotomous "use of EBMgt" response variable using three independent variables: attitude towards EBMgt, number of employees in the organization and the job position. Spearman's correlation indicated statistically significant relationships between healthcare leaders' use of EBMgt and healthcare organization bed size ( r = 0.217, n = 152, p < 0.01), attitude towards EBMgt ( r = 0.517, n = 152, p < 0.01), and the number of organization employees ( r = 0.195, n = 152, p = 0.016). Originality/value This study generated new research findings on the practice of EBMgt in US healthcare administration decision-making.

摘要

目的 本文旨在研究医疗保健领导者在面临重大决策时是否采用循证管理(EBMgt),以及医疗保健管理人员在决策过程中会参考哪些类型的证据。本研究还旨在确定在医疗保健管理中采用EBMgt、对EBMgt的态度、人口统计学特征和组织特征之间可能存在的任何关系。 设计/方法/途径 对美国医疗保健领导者进行了一项横断面研究。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)23.0进行斯皮尔曼相关性分析和逻辑回归分析。 结果 154名医疗保健领导者完成了调查。研究结果表明,90%的参与者自我报告在决策中使用了EBMgt方法。专业经验(87%)、组织数据(84%)和利益相关者的价值观(63%)是每日和每周决策时参考的前三大证据类型。案例研究(75%)和科研成果(75%)是每月或每月以下参考的前两大证据类型。一个探索性的逐步逻辑回归模型使用三个自变量(对EBMgt的态度、组织中的员工数量和职位)对二分的“使用EBMgt”响应变量的所有观测值进行了75.3%的正确分类。斯皮尔曼相关性分析表明,医疗保健领导者对EBMgt的使用与医疗保健组织床位规模(r = 0.217,n = 152,p < 0.01)、对EBMgt的态度(r = 0.517,n = 152,p < 0.01)以及组织员工数量(r = 0.195,n = 152,p = 0.016)之间存在统计学上的显著关系。 原创性/价值 本研究在美国医疗保健管理决策中EBMgt的实践方面产生了新的研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验