Välimäki Maritta, Hu Shuang, Lantta Tella, Hipp Kirsi, Varpula Jaakko, Chen Jiarui, Liu Gaoming, Tang Yao, Chen Wenjun, Li Xianhong
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, FI-20014, Finland.
School of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 3;23(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02096-4.
The central component in impactful healthcare decisions is evidence. Understanding how nurse leaders use evidence in their own managerial decision making is still limited. This mixed methods systematic review aimed to examine how evidence is used to solve leadership problems and to describe the measured and perceived effects of evidence-based leadership on nurse leaders and their performance, organizational, and clinical outcomes.
We included articles using any type of research design. We referred nurses, nurse managers or other nursing staff working in a healthcare context when they attempt to influence the behavior of individuals or a group in an organization using an evidence-based approach. Seven databases were searched until 11 November 2021. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-experimental studies, JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool were used to evaluate the Risk of bias in quasi-experimental studies, case series, mixed methods studies, respectively. The JBI approach to mixed methods systematic reviews was followed, and a parallel-results convergent approach to synthesis and integration was adopted.
Thirty-one publications were eligible for the analysis: case series (n = 27), mixed methods studies (n = 3) and quasi-experimental studies (n = 1). All studies were included regardless of methodological quality. Leadership problems were related to the implementation of knowledge into practice, the quality of nursing care and the resource availability. Organizational data was used in 27 studies to understand leadership problems, scientific evidence from literature was sought in 26 studies, and stakeholders' views were explored in 24 studies. Perceived and measured effects of evidence-based leadership focused on nurses' performance, organizational outcomes, and clinical outcomes. Economic data were not available.
This is the first systematic review to examine how evidence is used to solve leadership problems and to describe its measured and perceived effects from different sites. Although a variety of perceptions and effects were identified on nurses' performance as well as on organizational and clinical outcomes, available knowledge concerning evidence-based leadership is currently insufficient. Therefore, more high-quality research and clinical trial designs are still needed.
The study was registered (PROSPERO CRD42021259624).
有影响力的医疗决策的核心要素是证据。目前对于护士领导者在自身管理决策中如何运用证据的了解仍然有限。这项混合方法系统评价旨在探讨如何运用证据解决领导问题,并描述循证领导力对护士领导者及其绩效、组织和临床结果的实测及感知效果。
我们纳入了采用任何类型研究设计的文章。当护士、护士长或其他医护人员在医疗环境中尝试使用循证方法影响组织中个人或群体的行为时,我们将其纳入研究范围。检索了七个数据库,直至2021年11月11日。分别使用JBI准实验研究批判性评价清单、JBI病例系列批判性评价清单、混合方法评价工具来评估准实验研究、病例系列、混合方法研究中的偏倚风险。遵循JBI混合方法系统评价方法,采用并行结果收敛法进行综合与整合。
31篇出版物符合分析要求:病例系列(n = 27)、混合方法研究(n = 3)和准实验研究(n = 1)。所有研究均被纳入,无论其方法学质量如何。领导问题与知识转化为实践、护理质量和资源可用性有关。27项研究使用组织数据来理解领导问题,26项研究寻求文献中的科学证据,24项研究探索了利益相关者的观点。循证领导力的实测及感知效果集中在护士绩效、组织结果和临床结果上。未获取到经济数据。
这是第一项系统评价,旨在研究如何运用证据解决领导问题,并描述其在不同场所的实测及感知效果。尽管在护士绩效以及组织和临床结果方面发现了各种认知和效果,但目前关于循证领导力的现有知识仍不充分。因此,仍需要更多高质量的研究和临床试验设计。
该研究已注册(PROSPERO CRD42021259624)。