Primost Jezabel E, Marino Damián J G, Aparicio Virginia C, Costa José Luis, Carriquiriborde Pedro
Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente (CIMA - CONICET), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Calle 47 y 115 s/n, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce, Km 73.5, Ruta 226, 7620 Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Environ Pollut. 2017 Oct;229:771-779. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
In the Pampas, public concern has strongly risen because of the intensive use of glyphosate for weed control and fallow associated with biotech crops. The present study was aimed to evaluate the occurrence and concentration of the herbicide and its main metabolite (AMPA) in soil and other environmental compartments of the mentioned agroecosystem, including groundwater, in relation to real-world agricultural management practices in the region. Occurrence was almost ubiquitous in solid matrices (83-100%) with maximum concentrations among the higher reported in the world (soil: 8105 and 38939; sediment: 3294 and 7219; suspended particulate matter (SPM): 584 and 475 μg/kg of glyphosate and AMPA). Lower detection frequency was observed in surface water (27-55%) with maximum concentrations in whole water of 1.80 and 1.90 μg/L of glyphosate and AMPA, indicating that SPM analysis would be more sensitive for detection in the aquatic ecosystem. No detectable concentrations of glyphosate or AMPA were observed in groundwater. Glyphosate soil concentrations were better correlated with the total cumulative dose and total number of applications than the last spraying event dose, and an increment of 1 mg glyphosate/kg soil every 5 spraying events was estimated. Findings allow to infer that, under current practices, application rates are higher than dissipation rates. Hence, glyphosate and AMPA should be considered "pseudo-persistent" pollutants and a revisions of management procedures, monitoring programs, and ecological risk for soil and sediments should be also recommended.
在潘帕斯草原,由于草甘膦被大量用于杂草控制以及与转基因作物相关的休耕,公众关注度大幅上升。本研究旨在评估该农业生态系统的土壤及其他环境介质(包括地下水)中除草剂及其主要代谢物(氨甲基膦酸)的存在情况和浓度,这与该地区实际的农业管理实践相关。在固体介质中,草甘膦几乎无处不在(83%-100%),其最大浓度处于世界报道的较高水平(土壤:8105和38939;沉积物:3294和7219;悬浮颗粒物(SPM):584和475μg/kg草甘膦及氨甲基膦酸)。地表水中的检测频率较低(27%-55%),草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸在整个水体中的最大浓度分别为1.80和1.90μg/L,这表明对水生生态系统中的检测而言,SPM分析更为敏感。地下水中未检测到草甘膦或氨甲基膦酸的可检测浓度。与上次喷洒事件的剂量相比,草甘膦在土壤中的浓度与总累积剂量和总喷洒次数的相关性更好,估计每5次喷洒事件土壤中草甘膦含量会增加1mg/kg。研究结果表明,在当前实践下,施用率高于消散率。因此,草甘膦和氨甲基膦酸应被视为“准持久性”污染物,同时还建议修订管理程序、监测计划以及土壤和沉积物的生态风险评估。