Suppr超能文献

慢性阻塞性肺疾病的维持治疗:是时候逐步淘汰吸入性糖皮质激素并改用新型长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β2受体激动剂吸入器了吗?

Maintenance therapy in COPD: time to phase out ICS and switch to the new LAMA/LABA inhalers?

作者信息

Tariq Syed Mohammad, Thomas Enson C

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton.

Respiratory Unit, Bedford Hospital, Bedford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jun 23;12:1877-1882. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S138006. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Long-term maintenance therapy for COPD is evolving rapidly. Dual bronchodilation with new long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting beta-agonist (LAMA/LABA) fixed dose combination inhalers were introduced over the past 2 years. In clinical trials, these inhalers significantly improved lung function (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second), patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life measures compared with placebo, their respective monocomponents, and tiotropium. The recorded adverse events of these new inhalers were also similar to those of their monocomponents or placebo. There are concerns regarding long-term complications (weight gain, osteoporosis, cataract) and increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia with the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The new LAMA/LABA inhalers could potentially reduce the use of ICS as part and parcel of maintenance therapy in COPD. Recent studies compared these LAMA/LABA inhalers with ICS/LABA combination inhalers in moderate-to-severe COPD. The results are promising and favor the LAMA/LABA inhalers, especially in the longer duration trials. Furthermore, there is a clearer picture emerging as to the subgroup of COPD patients who may be able to successfully switch from their current ICS/LABA therapy to these new LAMA/LABA inhalers.

摘要

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的长期维持治疗正在迅速发展。在过去两年中,新型长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂与长效β受体激动剂(LAMA/LABA)固定剂量联合吸入器的双重支气管扩张疗法被引入。在临床试验中,与安慰剂、各自的单一组分以及噻托溴铵相比,这些吸入器显著改善了肺功能(一秒用力呼气容积谷值)、患者报告的结局以及生活质量指标。这些新型吸入器记录的不良事件也与它们的单一组分或安慰剂相似。使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)存在对长期并发症(体重增加、骨质疏松、白内障)以及社区获得性肺炎风险增加的担忧。新型LAMA/LABA吸入器有可能减少作为COPD维持治疗一部分的ICS的使用。最近的研究在中重度COPD患者中将这些LAMA/LABA吸入器与ICS/LABA联合吸入器进行了比较。结果很有前景,且更有利于LAMA/LABA吸入器,尤其是在更长疗程的试验中。此外,对于哪些COPD患者亚组可能能够成功地从当前ICS/LABA治疗转换为这些新型LAMA/LABA吸入器,情况也越来越清晰。

相似文献

1
Maintenance therapy in COPD: time to phase out ICS and switch to the new LAMA/LABA inhalers?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jun 23;12:1877-1882. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S138006. eCollection 2017.
2
LABA/LAMA combinations versus LAMA monotherapy or LABA/ICS in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 17;12:907-922. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S130482. eCollection 2017.
4
Inhaled treatment of COPD: a Delphi consensus statement.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 6;12:793-801. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S125564. eCollection 2017.
5
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) in COPD: time for a reappraisal.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 12;13:3971-3981. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S185975. eCollection 2018.
6
Role of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist/Long-Acting β-Agonist Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Aug;51(8):696-705. doi: 10.1177/1060028017705149. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
8
COPD treatment pathways in France: a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data from general practitioners.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 18;14:51-63. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S181224. eCollection 2019.
10
Respiratory medication used in COPD patients from seven Latin American countries: the LASSYC study.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 May 11;13:1545-1556. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154097. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Improves Patient Outcomes.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jun 17;20:1965-1972. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S511593. eCollection 2025.
2
Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: Personalising the therapeutic choice.
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 3;24(1). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2018.v24i1.184. eCollection 2018.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of COPD Maintenance Therapy with Tiotropium/Olodaterol versus LABA/ICS in a US Claims Database.
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2249-2270. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01646-5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment and Pharmacist-Led Medication Management.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021 Jan 12;15:111-124. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S286315. eCollection 2021.
5
A Simplified Algorithm for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of COPD in Routine Primary Care Practice.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Dec 16;15:3347-3355. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S281422. eCollection 2020.
6
Temporal Trends Of Pharmacologic Therapies For Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease In Alberta, Canada.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Sep 26;14:2245-2256. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S214191. eCollection 2019.
8
Classical and Emerging Therapies against Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Aug 20;131(16):1894-1897. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.238133.
9
Nrf2 attenuates inflammatory response in COPD/emphysema: Crosstalk with Wnt3a/β-catenin and AMPK pathways.
J Cell Mol Med. 2018 Jul;22(7):3514-3525. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13628. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

3
Efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone: a phase 3 COPD study.
Eur Respir J. 2016 Oct;48(4):1030-1039. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00216-2016. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
5
The Pharmacological Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 May 6;113(18):311-6. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0311.
6
Indacaterol-Glycopyrronium versus Salmeterol-Fluticasone for COPD.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2222-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516385. Epub 2016 May 15.
10
LANTERN: a randomized study of QVA149 versus salmeterol/fluticasone combination in patients with COPD.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Jun 5;10:1015-26. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S84436. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验