Penz Erika, Watt Kristina N, Hergott Christopher A, Rahman Najib M, Psallidas Ioannis
Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK.
Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Jun 23;9:229-241. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S95663. eCollection 2017.
Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a sign of advanced cancer and is associated with significant symptom burden and mortality. To date, management has been palliative in nature with a focus on draining the pleural space, with therapies aimed at preventing recurrence or providing intermittent drainage through indwelling catheters. Given that patients with MPEs are heterogeneous with respect to their cancer type and response to systemic therapy, functional status, and pleural milieu, response to MPE therapy is also heterogeneous and difficult to predict. Furthermore, the impact of therapies on important patient outcomes has only recently been evaluated consistently in clinical trials and cohort studies. In this review, we examine patient outcomes that have been studied to date, address the question of which are most important for managing patients, and review the literature related to the expected value for money (cost-effectiveness) of indwelling pleural catheters relative to traditionally recommended approaches.
恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是晚期癌症的一个标志,与显著的症状负担和死亡率相关。迄今为止,治疗本质上一直是姑息性的,重点是引流胸腔,治疗方法旨在预防复发或通过留置导管提供间歇性引流。鉴于MPE患者在癌症类型、对全身治疗的反应、功能状态和胸腔环境方面存在异质性,对MPE治疗的反应也存在异质性且难以预测。此外,治疗对重要患者结局的影响直到最近才在临床试验和队列研究中得到一致评估。在本综述中,我们研究了迄今为止所研究的患者结局,探讨对于管理患者而言哪些结局最为重要的问题,并回顾与留置胸腔导管相对于传统推荐方法的性价比(成本效益)相关的文献。