Jackson C, Stagg H R, Doshi A, Pan D, Sinha A, Batra R, Batra S, Abubakar I, Lipman M
Institute for Global Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.
Operation ASHA, New Delhi, India.
Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(2):134-140. doi: 10.5588/pha.16.0107.
Urban slums and poor rural areas in India, 2012-2014. To describe the characteristics of tuberculosis (TB) patients enrolled in treatment through Operation ASHA, a non-governmental organisation serving disadvantaged populations in India, and to identify risk factors for unfavourable treatment outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study. Patient characteristics were assessed for their relationship with treatment outcomes using mixed effects logistic regression, adjusting for clustering by treatment centre and Indian state. Outcomes were considered favourable (cured/treatment completed) or unfavourable (treatment failure, loss to follow-up, death, switch to multidrug-resistant TB treatment, transfer out). Of 8415 patients, 7148 (84.9%) had a favourable outcome. On multivariable analysis, unfavourable outcomes were more common among men (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.15-1.51), older patients (OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.04-1.21) and previously treated patients (OR 2.05, 95%CI 1.79-2.36). Compared to pulmonary smear-negative patients, those with extra-pulmonary disease were less likely to have unfavourable outcomes (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.60-0.87), while smear-positive pulmonary patients were more likely to have unfavourable outcomes (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.15-1.66 for low [scanty/1+] and OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.44-2.04 for high [2+/3+] positive smears). The treatment success rate within Operation ASHA is comparable to that reported nationally for India. Men, older patients, retreatment cases and smear-positive pulmonary TB patients may need additional interventions to ensure a favourable outcome.
2012 - 2014年印度的城市贫民窟和农村贫困地区。为描述通过“阿莎行动”(一个为印度弱势群体服务的非政府组织)登记接受治疗的结核病患者的特征,并确定治疗结果不佳的风险因素。这是一项回顾性队列研究。使用混合效应逻辑回归评估患者特征与治疗结果的关系,并对治疗中心和印度各邦的聚类情况进行调整。治疗结果分为良好(治愈/完成治疗)或不佳(治疗失败、失访、死亡、转为耐多药结核病治疗、转出)。在8415名患者中,7148名(84.9%)治疗结果良好。多变量分析显示,男性(比值比1.31,95%置信区间1.15 - 1.51)、老年患者(比值比1.12,95%置信区间1.04 - 1.21)和既往接受过治疗的患者(比值比2.05,95%置信区间1.79 - 2.36)治疗结果不佳更为常见。与肺部涂片阴性患者相比,肺外疾病患者治疗结果不佳的可能性较小(比值比0.72,95%置信区间0.60 - 0.87),而涂片阳性的肺部患者治疗结果不佳的可能性较大(涂片低阳性[少量/1+]时比值比1.38,95%置信区间1.15 - 1.66;涂片高阳性[2+/3+]时比值比为1.71,95%置信区间1.44 - 2.04)。“阿莎行动”的治疗成功率与印度全国报告的成功率相当。男性、老年患者、复治病例和涂片阳性的肺结核患者可能需要额外的干预措施以确保良好的治疗结果。