Tofflemire K L, Wang C, Jens J K, Ellinwood N M, Whitley R D, Ben-Shlomo G
Iowa State University, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, 1600 South 16th Street, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Iowa State University, Department of Animal Science, 806 Stange Road, Ames IA 50011, USA.
Vet J. 2017 Jun;224:7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 2.
Tonometry, an indirect measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), is important for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma and uveitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three hand-held tonometers in normal canine eyes. Eyes from cadavers of dogs without observable ocular disease were used to compare tonometric measurements with direct manometry over a range of 7.4-65mmHg. In vivo measurements using the three tonometers in both eyes of 12 healthy dogs were compared. All tonometers significantly underestimated manometric values both ex vivo and in vivo. One tonometer showed a small fixed bias over the range of IOP, whilst the other two tonometers had a negative proportional bias. The results of this study show that differences exist between handheld tonometers across the clinically relevant range of IOP, and that all underestimate manometric measurements.
眼压测量法是一种间接测量眼内压(IOP)的方法,对于青光眼和葡萄膜炎的诊断及治疗非常重要。本研究的目的是比较三种手持眼压计在正常犬眼中的性能。使用无明显眼部疾病的犬类尸体的眼睛,在7.4 - 65mmHg的范围内将眼压测量值与直接测压法进行比较。对12只健康犬双眼使用三种眼压计进行体内测量并比较。所有眼压计在体外和体内均显著低估了测压值。一种眼压计在眼压范围内显示出较小的固定偏差,而另外两种眼压计则有负的比例偏差。本研究结果表明,在临床相关的眼压范围内,手持眼压计之间存在差异,并且所有眼压计都低估了测压测量值。