Division of Oral Medicine and Pathology, Dental Clinic, Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, ItalybUniversity of Trieste, Department of Surgical, Medical and Health Sciences, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste, Department of Surgical, Medical and Health Sciences, Trieste, ItalycInstitute of Pathologic Anatomy, Ospedale di Cattinara, Trieste, Italy.
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Dec 1;22(12):121602. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.12.121602.
This study aims to compare the use of the innovative blue diode laser (BLUE group) with two traditional surgical techniques: the infrared diode laser (IR group) and the quantic molecular resonance scalpel (QMR group) in the excision of benign oral lesions. Ninety-three patients underwent surgical excision of a benign oral lesion and were followed up for 30 days for pain (0 to 10 visual analogue scale), bleeding, and painkillers’ assumption (yes/no). A blind pathologist evaluated the thermal damage along the cutting margin. Although referred pain was lowest in the BLUE group from day 7 on (p<0.05), all patients referred minimum discomfort after surgery. The BLUE group reported minimum bleeding and necessity of sutures (p<0.000). The QMR group showed the highest bleeding during surgery (p<0.000), while after 14 and 30 days no patient bled. Most of the patients in all groups did not need painkillers. The lowest thermal damage (p<0.000) was found in the BLUE group (71.3±51.8???m), whereas the IR group proved the highest (186.8±82.7???m) compared both with the BLUE and QMR (111.4±55.4???m) groups. All the techniques allowed correct histological sampling. All the experimented techniques offer interesting advantages, although the blue laser minimizes risk of bleeding with limited thermal damage.
本研究旨在比较创新的蓝光二极管激光(BLUE 组)与两种传统手术技术:红外二极管激光(IR 组)和量子分子共振手术刀(QMR 组)在切除良性口腔病变中的应用。93 名患者接受了良性口腔病变的手术切除,并在 30 天内接受疼痛(0 到 10 视觉模拟评分)、出血和止痛药使用(是/否)的随访。一位盲法病理学家评估了沿切割边缘的热损伤。尽管从第 7 天开始,BLUE 组的牵涉痛最低(p<0.05),但所有患者在手术后都报告了最小的不适。BLUE 组报告的出血量最少,且无需缝合(p<0.000)。QMR 组在手术过程中出血最多(p<0.000),而在 14 天和 30 天后,没有患者出血。大多数患者在所有组中均无需使用止痛药。BLUE 组的热损伤最低(p<0.000)(71.3±51.8???m),而 IR 组的热损伤最高(186.8±82.7???m),与 BLUE 组和 QMR 组(111.4±55.4???m)相比均更高。所有组的技术均允许正确的组织学取样。所有实验技术都提供了有趣的优势,尽管蓝光激光最大限度地减少了出血风险,且热损伤有限。