• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院心力衰竭患者的住院死亡率风险评分及出院后事件:一项基于社区的研究。

Inpatient Mortality Risk Scores and Postdischarge Events in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients: A Community-Based Study.

作者信息

Win Sithu, Hussain Imad, Hebl Virginia B, Dunlay Shannon M, Redfield Margaret M

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Circulatory Failure, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Current address for Dr Hussain: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX. Current address for Dr Hebl: Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003926.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003926
PMID:28701328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5637410/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) and Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) registries have developed simple heart failure (HF) in-hospital mortality risk scores. We hypothesized that HF scores predictive of in-hospital mortality would perform as well for early postdischarge mortality risk stratification.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this single-center, community-based, retrospective study of all consecutive primary HF hospitalizations (6203 hospitalizations in 3745 patients) from 2000 to 2013, the ADHERE and GWTG risk scores were calculated from admission data. There were 176 (3.0%) and 399 (6.7%), 869 (14.7%), and 1272 (21.5%) deaths in-hospital and at 30, 90, and 180 days postdischarge, respectively. The GWTG but not ADHERE risk score was well calibrated for in-hospital mortality. Both the ADHERE (C statistic 0.66 and 0.67, 0.64, and 0.64) and GWTG (C statistic 0.74 and 0.73, 0.71, and 0.70) HF risk scores were similarly predictive of in-hospital and 30-, 90-, and 180-day postdischarge mortality. The ADHERE risk score identified 10% and the GWTG risk score identified 20% of hospitalizations where 180-day postdischarge mortality was 50%, a prognostic bench mark for hospice referral. In contrast, hospitalizations characterized as lowest risk by the ADHERE (57% of hospitalizations; 180-day mortality 16.2%) or GWTG score (20% of hospitalizations; 180-day mortality 8.0%) had substantially lower mortality (odds ratios high versus low risk of 5-8 [ADHERE] and 11-18 [GWTG] across time points; <0.0001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The simple ADHERE and GWTG scores stratify hospitalized HF patients for both inpatient and early postdischarge mortality risk, allowing comprehensive risk assessment on admission.

摘要

背景

急性失代偿性心力衰竭国家注册登记处(ADHERE)和遵循指南(GWTG)注册登记处已制定了简单的心力衰竭(HF)院内死亡风险评分。我们假设,预测院内死亡的HF评分对于出院后早期死亡风险分层同样有效。

方法与结果

在这项基于社区的单中心回顾性研究中,纳入了2000年至2013年期间所有连续性原发性HF住院患者(3745例患者中的6203次住院),根据入院数据计算ADHERE和GWTG风险评分。分别有176例(3.0%)、399例(6.7%)、869例(14.7%)和1272例(21.5%)患者在住院期间、出院后30天、90天和180天死亡。GWTG风险评分(而非ADHERE风险评分)对于院内死亡具有良好的校准度。ADHERE(C统计量分别为0.66、0.67、0.64和0.64)和GWTG(C统计量分别为0.74、0.73、0.71和0.70)HF风险评分对于院内以及出院后30天、90天和180天死亡同样具有预测性。ADHERE风险评分识别出10%的住院患者,GWTG风险评分识别出20%的住院患者,这些患者出院后180天死亡率为50%,这是临终关怀转诊的一个预后基准。相比之下,ADHERE(占住院患者的57%;180天死亡率16.2%)或GWTG评分(占住院患者的20%;180天死亡率8.0%)所确定的低风险住院患者死亡率显著更低(不同时间点高风险与低风险的比值比,ADHERE为5至8,GWTG为11至18;所有均<0.0001)。

结论

简单的ADHERE和GWTG评分可对住院HF患者的住院期间及出院后早期死亡风险进行分层,从而在入院时进行全面的风险评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/eaf5ea2a6549/nihms885969f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/5efd8137456e/nihms885969f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/b4ab5f4dbd86/nihms885969f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/23d842102a8a/nihms885969f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/eaf5ea2a6549/nihms885969f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/5efd8137456e/nihms885969f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/b4ab5f4dbd86/nihms885969f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/23d842102a8a/nihms885969f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f33/5637410/eaf5ea2a6549/nihms885969f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Inpatient Mortality Risk Scores and Postdischarge Events in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients: A Community-Based Study.住院心力衰竭患者的住院死亡率风险评分及出院后事件:一项基于社区的研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;10(7). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003926.
2
Predictive Value of the Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score in Unselected Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.指南指导下心力衰竭风险评分在未选择的心脏重症监护病房患者中的预测价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 4;9(3):e012439. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012439. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
3
Validation of the Intermountain Risk Score and Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Score in predicting mortality.验证 Intermountain 风险评分和 Get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure 评分对死亡率的预测能力。
Open Heart. 2021 Aug;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001722.
4
Sequential organ failure assessment score on admission predicts long-term mortality in acute heart failure patients.入院时的序贯性器官衰竭评估评分可预测急性心力衰竭患者的长期死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;7(1):244-252. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12563. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Trends in Hospice Discharge and Relative Outcomes Among Medicare Patients in the Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.《指南导向下心力衰竭注册研究中 Medicare 患者的临终关怀出院率及相关结局趋势》
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;3(10):917-926. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2678.
6
Characteristics of Acute Heart Failure Hospitalizations Based on Presenting Severity.基于就诊严重程度的急性心力衰竭住院患者的特征。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Jan;12(1):e005171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005171.
7
Validation of the Get With The Guideline-Heart Failure risk score in Japanese patients and the potential improvement of its discrimination ability by the inclusion of B-type natriuretic peptide level.日本患者中“遵循心力衰竭治疗指南风险评分”的验证以及通过纳入B型利钠肽水平对其鉴别能力的潜在改善。
Am Heart J. 2016 Jan;171(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
8
Validation and Comparison of Seven Mortality Prediction Models for Hospitalized Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.七种急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者死亡率预测模型的验证与比较
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002912.
9
A validated risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure from the American Heart Association get with the guidelines program.美国心脏协会“遵循指南”项目中针对心力衰竭患者院内死亡率的经过验证的风险评分。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):25-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.854877. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
10
Predictors of mortality after discharge in patients hospitalized with heart failure: an analysis from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF).心力衰竭住院患者出院后死亡率的预测因素:来自心力衰竭住院患者启动挽救生命治疗组织项目(OPTIMIZE-HF)的分析。
Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):662-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Models in Heart Failure: Hope or Hype?心力衰竭的预后模型:希望还是炒作?
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):345. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080345.
2
Risk classification for long-term mortality among patients with acute heart failure: China PEACE 4YMortality.急性心力衰竭患者长期死亡率的风险分类:中国PEACE 4Y死亡率研究
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun;12(3):1992-2009. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15207. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
The modified Rajan's heart failure risk score predicts all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation and Comparison of Seven Mortality Prediction Models for Hospitalized Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.七种急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者死亡率预测模型的验证与比较
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;9(8). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002912.
2
Predicting mortality in patients with acute heart failure: Role of risk scores.预测急性心力衰竭患者的死亡率:风险评分的作用。
World J Cardiol. 2015 Dec 26;7(12):902-11. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i12.902.
3
Discharge Hospice Referral and Lower 30-Day All-Cause Readmission in Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure.
改良的拉詹心力衰竭风险评分可预测射血分数降低的心力衰竭住院患者的全因死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Feb 28;86(4):1843-1849. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001646. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio: a novel mortality indicator in intensive care unit patients with coronary heart disease.血尿素氮与血清白蛋白比值:冠心病重症监护病房患者的一种新的死亡预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 29;14(1):7466. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58090-y.
5
Development and Validation of R-hf Risk Score in Acute Heart Failure Patients in the Middle East.中东地区急性心力衰竭患者R-hf风险评分的开发与验证
Oman Med J. 2023 Jul 31;38(4):e529. doi: 10.5001/omj.2023.89. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Use of the ADHERE Risk Model as a Predictor of Risk of in-Hospital Worsening Heart Failure in a Cohort.使用 ADHERE 风险模型预测队列中住院心力衰竭恶化的风险。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;120(8):e20220584. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220584. eCollection 2023.
7
Performance of the heart failure risk scores in predicting 1 year mortality and short-term readmission of patients.心力衰竭风险评分在预测患者 1 年死亡率和短期再入院率方面的表现。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):502-517. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14208. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Validation of R-hf risk score for risk stratification in ischemic heart failure patients: A prospective cohort study.R-hf风险评分在缺血性心力衰竭患者风险分层中的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Aug 5;80:104333. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104333. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Implementation of EHMRG Risk Model in an Italian Population of Elderly Patients with Acute Heart Failure.EHMRG风险模型在意大利老年急性心力衰竭患者群体中的应用
J Clin Med. 2022 May 25;11(11):2982. doi: 10.3390/jcm11112982.
10
Do we need a simplified model to predict outcomes in patients hospitalized with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure? Results from The Role of Sodium in Heart Failure Outcomes Prediction ('SHOUT-PREDICTION') study.我们是否需要一个简化的模型来预测因急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院的患者的结局?来自心力衰竭结局中钠作用预测(SHOUT-PREDICTION)研究的结果。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jul-Aug;73(4):458-463. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
医疗保险受益人心力衰竭住院患者的出院临终关怀转诊与降低30天全因再入院率
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;8(4):733-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002153. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Risk prediction in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and analysis.心力衰竭患者的风险预测:系统评价和分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Oct;2(5):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
5
Clinical prediction rules in practice: review of clinical guidelines and survey of GPs.临床实践中的临床预测规则:临床指南综述与全科医生调查
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Apr;64(621):e233-42. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X677860.
6
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组关于心力衰竭管理的指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;62(16):e147-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.019. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
7
Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.预测心力衰竭对美国的影响:美国心脏协会的政策声明。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):606-19. doi: 10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
8
Derivation and validation of automated electronic search strategies to extract Charlson comorbidities from electronic medical records.从电子病历中提取 Charlson 共病的自动化电子检索策略的推导和验证。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Sep;87(9):817-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.04.015.
9
The CHADS₂versus the new CHA2DS2-VASc scoring systems for guiding antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: review of the literature and recommendations for use.CHADS₂ 评分系统与新的 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分系统在指导心房颤动患者抗栓治疗中的应用:文献复习与推荐意见。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Mar;32(3):285-96. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01023.x.
10
Influence of frailty and health status on outcomes in patients with coronary disease undergoing percutaneous revascularization.衰弱和健康状况对接受经皮血管重建术的冠心病患者预后的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011 Sep;4(5):496-502. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.961375. Epub 2011 Aug 30.