O'Connor Claire M, Landin-Romero Ramon, Clemson Lindy, Kaizik Cassandra, Daveson Naomi, Hodges John R, Hsieh Sharpley, Piguet Olivier, Mioshi Eneida
From the Ageing, Work and Health Research Unit (C.M.O., L.C.), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney; Neuroscience Research Australia and University of New South Wales (R.L.-R., C.K., N.D., J.R.H., S.H., O.P.); Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders (R.L.-R., J.R.H., S.H., O.P.), University of New South Wales; Brain and Mind Centre (R.L.-R., J.R.H., S.H., O.P.), Sydney, Australia; and School of Health Sciences (E.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Neurology. 2017 Aug 8;89(6):570-577. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004215. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
To identify distinct behavioral phenotypes of behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and to elucidate differences in functional, neuroimaging, and progression to residential care placement.
Eighty-eight patients with bvFTD were included in a cluster analysis applying levels of disinhibition and apathy (Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised) to identify phenotypic subgroups. Between-group (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney ) functional differences (Disability Assessment for Dementia) and time to residential care placement (survival analyses) were examined. Cortical thickness differences (whole-brain MRI) were analyzed in patients with bvFTD vs healthy controls (n = 30) and between phenotypic subgroups.
Four phenotypic subgroups were identified: primary severe apathy (n = 26), severe apathy and disinhibition (n = 26), mild apathy and disinhibition (n = 27), and primary severe disinhibition (n = 9). Patients with severely apathetic phenotypes were more functionally impaired and had more extensive brain atrophy than those with mild apathy or severe disinhibition alone. Further imaging analyses indicated that the right middle temporal region is critical for the development of disinhibition, an association that remains with disease progression and in the context of severe apathy. Finally, no difference in time to residential care admission was found between phenotypes.
This study reveals that different clinical behavioral phenotypes of bvFTD have differing profiles of functional decline and distinct patterns of associated cortical changes. These findings emphasize the importance of apathy in functional impairment, highlight the role of the right temporal region in disinhibition, and suggest that disability may be a sensitive outcome measure for treatments targeting reduction of apathy. These phenotypes could also support understanding of prognosis and clinical management.
识别行为变异型额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)的不同行为表型,并阐明其在功能、神经影像学以及进入住院护理机构方面的进展差异。
88例bvFTD患者纳入聚类分析,应用去抑制和淡漠水平(修订版剑桥行为量表)来识别表型亚组。检验组间(Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney检验)功能差异(痴呆残疾评估)以及进入住院护理机构的时间(生存分析)。分析bvFTD患者与健康对照(n = 30)之间以及表型亚组之间的皮质厚度差异(全脑MRI)。
识别出四个表型亚组:原发性重度淡漠(n = 26)、重度淡漠和去抑制(n = 26)、轻度淡漠和去抑制(n = 27)以及原发性重度去抑制(n = 9)。与单独存在轻度淡漠或重度去抑制的患者相比,具有重度淡漠表型的患者功能受损更严重,脑萎缩范围更广。进一步的影像学分析表明,右侧颞中区域对于去抑制的发展至关重要,这种关联在疾病进展过程中以及在重度淡漠的情况下仍然存在。最后,各表型在进入住院护理机构的时间上未发现差异。
本研究表明,bvFTD的不同临床行为表型具有不同的功能衰退特征和相关皮质变化的独特模式。这些发现强调了淡漠在功能损害中的重要性,突出了右侧颞叶区域在去抑制中的作用,并表明残疾可能是针对减少淡漠的治疗的一个敏感结局指标。这些表型也有助于理解预后和临床管理。