Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Neurol. 2024 Aug;271(8):4963-4971. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12430-0. Epub 2024 May 17.
Motivational disturbances are pervasive in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and impact negatively on everyday functioning. Despite mounting evidence of anhedonia in FTD, it remains unclear how such changes fit within the broader motivational symptom profile of FTD, or how anhedonia relates to functional outcomes. Here we sought to comprehensively characterize motivational disturbances in FTD and their respective relationships with functional impairment. A cross-sectional study design was used including 211 participants-68 behavioral-variant FTD (bvFTD), 32 semantic dementia (SD), 43 Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 68 healthy older control participants. Anhedonia severity was measured using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale while severity of apathy was assessed across Emotional, Executive, and Initiation dimensions using the Dimensional Apathy Scale. Functional impairment was established using the FTD Functional Rating Scale (FRS). Distinct motivational profiles emerged in each dementia syndrome: a domain-general motivational impairment in bvFTD; a predominantly anhedonic profile in SD; and more pronounced initiation and executive apathy in AD. Correlation analyses revealed differential associations between motivational symptoms and severity of functional impairment in each group. Executive apathy was associated with functional impairment in bvFTD, while anhedonia was strongly correlated with functional decline in SD. Finally, executive and emotional apathy were associated with functional decline in AD. Our study indicates distinct profiles of apathy and anhedonia in FTD syndromes, which in turn are differentially associated with functional decline. This detailed characterization of motivational phenotypes can inform patient stratification for targeted interventions to improve functional outcomes.
动机障碍在额颞叶痴呆(FTD)中普遍存在,并对日常功能产生负面影响。尽管 FTD 中存在快感缺失的证据越来越多,但仍不清楚这些变化如何适应 FTD 更广泛的动机症状谱,或者快感缺失与功能结果的关系如何。在这里,我们试图全面描述 FTD 中的动机障碍及其与功能障碍的各自关系。采用横断面研究设计,包括 211 名参与者-68 名行为变异型 FTD(bvFTD)、32 名语义痴呆(SD)、43 名阿尔茨海默病(AD)和 68 名健康老年对照组参与者。使用 Snaith-Hamilton 快感量表测量快感缺失的严重程度,而使用多维淡漠量表评估情感、执行和启动维度的淡漠严重程度。使用 FTD 功能评定量表(FRS)确定功能障碍的严重程度。在每种痴呆综合征中都出现了不同的动机特征:bvFTD 中的一般性动机障碍;SD 中的主要快感缺失特征;AD 中更明显的启动和执行淡漠。相关性分析显示,在每组中,动机症状与功能障碍严重程度之间存在不同的关联。执行性淡漠与 bvFTD 的功能障碍相关,而快感缺失与 SD 的功能下降密切相关。最后,执行性和情感性淡漠与 AD 的功能下降相关。我们的研究表明,FTD 综合征中存在不同的淡漠和快感缺失特征,这些特征与功能下降的相关性也不同。这种对动机表型的详细描述可以为有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以改善功能结果。