Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Cologne-Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
Antiinfectives Intelligence GmbH, Rheinbach, Germany.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Feb;51(2):227-234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
To evaluate the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with other broad-spectrum antimicrobials against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae, 497 non-duplicate P. aeruginosa and 802 Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates were consecutively collected during the period from September 2014 to April 2015 from patients in Germany with bloodstream, lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal or urinary tract infections. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution. Results were interpreted according to EUCAST criteria. Ceftolozane/tazobactam showed good activity against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with MIC values of 0.25/0.5 mg/L and 0.25/1 mg/L, respectively. Comparatively, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime and meropenem MIC values were 2/8 mg/L, 0.25/8 mg/L and ≤0.03/ ≤ 0.03 mg/L, respectively, for E. coli, and 2/16 mg/L, 0.12/8 mg/L, and ≤0.03/ ≤ 0.03 mg/L, respectively, for K. pneumoniae isolates. The activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against P. aeruginosa was superior to that of other antipseudomonal antimicrobials. Based on MIC values, ceftolozane/tazobactam (0.5/2 mg/L) was more active than piperacillin/tazobactam (8/64 mg/L), ceftazidime (2/16 mg/L), cefepime (2/16 mg/L) or meropenem (0.5/8 mg/L). In conclusion, ceftolozane/tazobactam exhibited the best in vitro potency of the antibiotics tested against P. aeruginosa, including isolates that were resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, doripenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and tobramycin. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has the potential to become a useful addition to the limited armamentarium of drugs that can be used to treat this problem pathogen.
为了评估头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科的活性与其他广谱抗菌药物相比,从 2014 年 9 月至 2015 年 4 月期间,连续从德国患有血流感染、下呼吸道感染、腹腔内或尿路感染的患者中分离了 497 株非重复铜绿假单胞菌和 802 株肠杆菌科临床分离株。采用肉汤微量稀释法进行抗菌药物敏感性试验。根据 EUCAST 标准解释结果。头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株具有良好的活性,MIC 值分别为 0.25/0.5mg/L 和 0.25/1mg/L。相比之下,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢他啶和美罗培南对大肠埃希菌的 MIC 值分别为 2/8mg/L、0.25/8mg/L 和≤0.03/≤0.03mg/L,对肺炎克雷伯菌的 MIC 值分别为 2/16mg/L、0.12/8mg/L 和≤0.03/≤0.03mg/L。头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对铜绿假单胞菌的活性优于其他抗假单胞菌抗菌药物。根据 MIC 值,头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦(0.5/2mg/L)比哌拉西林/他唑巴坦(8/64mg/L)、头孢他啶(2/16mg/L)、头孢吡肟(2/16mg/L)或美罗培南(0.5/8mg/L)更具活性。总之,头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦对包括对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、头孢吡肟、头孢他啶、多利培南、美罗培南、环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、阿米卡星和妥布霉素耐药的铜绿假单胞菌分离株在内的测试抗菌药物表现出最佳的体外效力。头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦有可能成为治疗这种问题病原体的有限武器库中的一种有用的添加物。