Hicks Daniel J, Stapleford Thomas A
Isis. 2016 Sep;107(3):449-72. doi: 10.1086/688346.
“Practice” has become a ubiquitous term in the history of science, and yet historians have not always reflected on its philosophical import and in particular on its potential connections with ethics. This essay draws on the work of the virtue ethicist Alasdair MacIntyre to develop a theory of “communal practices” and explore how such an approach can inform the history of science, including allegations about the corruption of science by wealth or power, consideration of scientific ethics or “moral economies,” the role of values in science, the ethical distinctiveness (or not) of scientific vocations, and the relationship between history of science and the practice of science itself.
“实践”已成为科学史上一个无处不在的术语,然而历史学家们并非总是思考其哲学意义,尤其是其与伦理的潜在联系。本文借鉴德性伦理学家阿拉斯戴尔·麦金太尔的著作,发展出一种“社群实践”理论,并探讨这种方法如何为科学史提供信息,包括关于科学被财富或权力腐蚀的指控、对科学伦理或“道德经济”的考量、价值观在科学中的作用、科学职业的伦理独特性(或缺乏独特性),以及科学史与科学实践本身之间的关系。