Guadagno Carmela R, Ewers Brent E, Speckman Heather N, Aston Timothy Llewellyn, Huhn Bridger J, DeVore Stanley B, Ladwig Joshua T, Strawn Rachel N, Weinig Cynthia
Botany Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071
Botany Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071.
Plant Physiol. 2017 Sep;175(1):223-234. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00581. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Climate models predict widespread increases in both drought intensity and duration in the next decades. Although water deficiency is a significant determinant of plant survival, limited understanding of plant responses to extreme drought impedes forecasts of both forest and crop productivity under increasing aridity. Drought induces a suite of physiological responses; however, we lack an accurate mechanistic description of plant response to lethal drought that would improve predictive understanding of mortality under altered climate conditions. Here, proxies for leaf cellular damage, chlorophyll fluorescence, and electrolyte leakage were directly associated with failure to recover from drought upon rewatering in (genotype R500) and thus define the exact timing of drought-induced death. We validated our results using a second genotype (imb211) that differs substantially in life history traits. Our study demonstrates that whereas changes in carbon dynamics and water transport are critical indicators of drought stress, they can be unrelated to visible metrics of mortality, i.e. lack of meristematic activity and regrowth. In contrast, membrane failure at the cellular scale is the most proximate cause of death. This hypothesis was corroborated in two gymnosperms ( and ) that experienced lethal water stress in the field and in laboratory conditions. We suggest that measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence can be used to operationally define plant death arising from drought, and improved plant characterization can enhance surface model predictions of drought mortality and its consequences to ecosystem services at a global scale.
气候模型预测,在未来几十年里,干旱强度和持续时间将普遍增加。尽管水分亏缺是植物生存的一个重要决定因素,但对植物对极端干旱反应的了解有限,这阻碍了对干旱加剧情况下森林和作物生产力的预测。干旱会引发一系列生理反应;然而,我们缺乏对植物对致命干旱反应的准确机制描述,而这将有助于在气候变化条件下更好地预测死亡率。在这里,叶片细胞损伤、叶绿素荧光和电解质渗漏的指标与(基因型R500)复水后无法从干旱中恢复直接相关,从而确定了干旱导致死亡的确切时间。我们使用了第二种在生活史特征上有很大差异的基因型(imb211)验证了我们的结果。我们的研究表明,虽然碳动态和水分运输的变化是干旱胁迫的关键指标,但它们可能与死亡的明显指标无关,即分生组织活动和再生的缺乏。相比之下,细胞水平的膜破坏是最直接的死亡原因。这一假设在两种裸子植物(和)中得到了证实,它们在野外和实验室条件下都经历了致命的水分胁迫。我们建议,叶绿素荧光测量可用于实际定义干旱导致的植物死亡,改进的植物特征描述可以增强地表模型对干旱死亡率及其对全球生态系统服务影响的预测。