Suppr超能文献

公开披露药企向医师支付款项对患者信任的影响:一项随机实验

The Effects of Public Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians on Patient Trust: A Randomized Experiment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Harvard PhD Program in Health Policy and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1186-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4122-y. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Financial ties between physicians and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry are common, but little is known about how patient trust is affected by these ties.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how viewing online public disclosure of industry payments affects patients' trust ratings for physicians, the medical profession, and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry.

DESIGN

This was a randomized experimental evaluation.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 278 English-speaking participants over age 18 who had seen a healthcare provider in the previous 12 months who took part in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants searched for physicians on an online disclosure database, viewed payments from industry to the physicians, and assigned trust ratings. Participants were randomized to view physicians who received no payment ($0), low payment ($250-300), or high payment (>$13,000) from industry, or to a control arm in which they did not view the disclosure website. They also were asked to search for and then rate trust in their own physician.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcomes were trust in individual physician, medical profession, and industry. These scales measure trust as a composite of honesty, fidelity, competence, and global trust.

KEY RESULTS

Compared to physicians who received no payments, physicians who received payments over $13,000 received lower ratings for honesty [mean (SD): 3.36 (0.86) vs. 2.75 (0.95), p < 0.001] and fidelity [3.19 (0.65) vs. 2.89 (0.68), p = 0.01]. Among the 7.9% of participants who found their own physician on the website, ratings for honesty and fidelity decreased as the industry payment to the physician increased (honesty: Spearman's ρ = -0.52, p = 0.02; fidelity: Spearman's ρ = -0.55, p = 0.01). Viewing the disclosure website did not affect trust ratings for the medical profession or industry.

CONCLUSIONS

Disclosure of industry payments to physicians affected perceptions of individual physician honesty and fidelity, but not perceptions of competence. Disclosure did not affect trust ratings for the medical profession or the pharmaceutical and medical device industry. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02179632 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02179632 ).

摘要

背景

医生与制药和医疗设备行业之间的财务联系很常见,但人们对这些联系如何影响患者的信任知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在评估查看行业支付的在线公开披露如何影响患者对医生、医疗行业和制药及医疗设备行业的信任评级。

设计

这是一项随机实验评估。

参与者

共有 278 名年龄在 18 岁以上、在过去 12 个月内看过医疗保健提供者的讲英语的参与者参加了这项研究。

干预措施

参与者在在线披露数据库中搜索医生,查看行业向医生支付的款项,并给出信任评级。参与者被随机分配查看医生是否收到行业的零支付($0)、低支付($250-300)或高支付(>$13000),或在控制臂中不查看披露网站。他们还被要求搜索并对自己的医生的信任进行评级。

主要测量指标

主要结果是对个别医生、医疗行业和行业的信任。这些量表将信任作为诚实、忠诚、能力和整体信任的综合指标进行衡量。

结果

与未收到付款的医生相比,收到超过$13000 行业付款的医生在诚实方面的评分较低[平均值(标准差):3.36(0.86)比 2.75(0.95),p<0.001]和忠诚度[3.19(0.65)比 2.89(0.68),p=0.01]。在网站上找到自己医生的 7.9%的参与者中,随着医生从行业获得的报酬增加,对诚实和忠诚的评级下降(诚实:Spearman 的 ρ=-0.52,p=0.02;忠诚:Spearman 的 ρ=-0.55,p=0.01)。查看披露网站并未影响对医疗行业或行业的信任评级。

结论

向医生披露行业支付款项会影响患者对医生个人诚实和忠诚的看法,但不会影响对医生能力的看法。披露对医疗行业或制药和医疗设备行业的信任评级没有影响。临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT02179632(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02179632)。

相似文献

1
The Effects of Public Disclosure of Industry Payments to Physicians on Patient Trust: A Randomized Experiment.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Nov;32(11):1186-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4122-y. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
2
US Nationwide Disclosure of Industry Payments and Public Trust in Physicians.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191947. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1947.
4
Public Disclosure of Payments to Physicians From Industry.
JAMA. 2017 May 2;317(17):1749-1750. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2613.
5
Public Awareness of and Contact With Physicians Who Receive Industry Payments: A National Survey.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):767-774. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4012-3. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Letting the sunshine in: shining a new light on physician-industry relationships.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2010 Mar;2(1):80-2. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2010.002196.

引用本文的文献

2
Healthcare consumers' perceptions of incentive-linked prescribing: A scoping review.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Jun 27;4(6):e0003026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003026. eCollection 2024.
3
Incentivisation practices and their influence on physicians' prescriptions: A qualitative analysis of practice and policy in Pakistan.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 29;3(6):e0001890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001890. eCollection 2023.
4
Measuring Trust in Primary Care.
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):841-880. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12654. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Disclosing Conflicts of Interest to Potential Research Participants: Good for Nothing?
Ethics Hum Res. 2023 Mar;45(2):2-13. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500157.
6
Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives in the United States and China: The Need for Professional Public Space.
Health Care Anal. 2022 Mar;30(1):35-56. doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00438-w. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
7
Review of Industry Payments to General Orthopaedic Surgeons Reported by the Open Payments Database: 2014 to 2019.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 May 7;5(5):e21.00060. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00060.
8
French Public Familiarity and Attitudes toward Clinical Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;18(5):2611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052611.
9
A Ray of Sunshine: Transparency in Physician-Industry Relationships Is Not Enough.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3194-3198. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06657-0. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Pitfalls and Safeguards in Industry-Funded Research.
Ochsner J. 2020 Spring;20(1):104-110. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0093.

本文引用的文献

1
Insinuation Anxiety: Concern That Advice Rejection Will Signal Distrust After Conflict of Interest Disclosures.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Jul;45(7):1099-1112. doi: 10.1177/0146167218805991. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
2
Effect of physician disclosure of specialty bias on patient trust and treatment choice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7465-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604908113. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
The Physician Payment Sunshine Act: testing the value of transparency.
JAMA. 2015 Jan 6;313(1):23-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15472.
5
Nothing to declare: mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):575-84. doi: 10.1177/0956797613511824. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
Physicians under the influence: social psychology and industry marketing strategies.
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Fall;41(3):665-72. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12076.
7
What is the enemy in CME, conflicts of interest or bias?
JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1019-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.221227.
8
Sunlight as disinfectant--new rules on disclosure of industry payments to physicians.
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):2052-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1305090.
9
Distributions of industry payments to Massachusetts physicians.
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):2049-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302723. Epub 2013 May 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验